Judgments of mathematical beauty are resistant to revision through external opinion.

aesthetic judgments biological beauty mathematical beauty neuroaesthetics

Journal

PsyCh journal
ISSN: 2046-0260
Titre abrégé: Psych J
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101598595

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Historique:
revised: 20 03 2022
received: 08 11 2021
accepted: 24 03 2022
pubmed: 2 5 2022
medline: 12 10 2022
entrez: 1 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We here address the question of the extent to which judgments of mathematical beauty (which we categorize as biological beauty) are resistant to revision through external opinion. A total of 100 mathematicians of different national and ethnic origins were asked to rate 60 mathematical equations for their beauty; after being presented a fictitious "expert rating," they were asked to re-rate the same equations. Results showed that the judgments of mathematical beauty had a high level of resistance to external opinion. This is in line with the resistance to revision of a judgments for other categories of biological beauty.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35491015
doi: 10.1002/pchj.556
pmc: PMC9790661
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

741-747

Subventions

Organisme : Leverhulme Trust
ID : RPG-2017-341

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Références

Perception. 2007;36(11):1674-81
pubmed: 18265847
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Nov 30;12:467
pubmed: 30555311
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001 Oct;23(5):695-700
pubmed: 11778646
Psych J. 2022 Oct;11(5):741-747
pubmed: 35491015
Psych J. 2021 Apr;10(2):190-199
pubmed: 33295099
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 12;117(19):10218-10224
pubmed: 32341163
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Feb 13;8:68
pubmed: 24592230
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203
pubmed: 30734206
Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Mar;51(6):1441-1462
pubmed: 31397945
Psych J. 2022 Oct;11(5):707-714
pubmed: 34614548
Cognition. 2018 Oct;179:121-131
pubmed: 29936343
Curr Biol. 2015 Oct 19;25(20):2684-9
pubmed: 26441352
Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Jan;51(2):670-680
pubmed: 31437870
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jul;22(7):894-900
pubmed: 21653908

Auteurs

Haoxuan Zhang (H)

Laboratory of Neurobiology, Division of Cell & Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.

Semir Zeki (S)

Laboratory of Neurobiology, Division of Cell & Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH