Pitfalls of Echocardiographic Image Perception: How to Overcome Them?
compression
digital echocardiography
echocardiography monitors
echocardiography workstations
frame rate
Journal
Frontiers in medicine
ISSN: 2296-858X
Titre abrégé: Front Med (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648047
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
19
01
2022
accepted:
23
03
2022
entrez:
2
5
2022
pubmed:
3
5
2022
medline:
3
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In recent years, the significant development of echocardiography systems has led to a sharp improvement in echocardiographic images' quality. In parallel with this, computerized technologies are also going far forward, which today make it possible to ensure a high level of transmission, storage, and display of echocardiography studies. Despite this, many cardiologists are not familiar with modern computerized technologies' new possibilities and continue to use the old standards. That is why many echocardiography laboratories with the best echocardiography systems work following the old minimalist approach. In this paper, we will look at some of the most common mistakes that result from the improper transmission, storage, and demonstration of echocardiography studies, and describe possible ways to overcome these problems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35492368
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.850555
pmc: PMC9051239
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
850555Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Leitman, Tyomkin and Beeri.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018 May;31(5):634-636
pubmed: 29573930
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Mar;18(3):287-97
pubmed: 15746725
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018 May;31(5):636-638
pubmed: 29606332
Sci Rep. 2015 Feb 03;5:7861
pubmed: 25644611
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jul;72(5):1205-17
pubmed: 20601701
Insights Imaging. 2011 Feb;2(1):47-55
pubmed: 22347933