Efficacy of the eHealth application Oncokompas, facilitating incurably ill cancer patients to self-manage their palliative care needs: A randomized controlled trial.
Incurable cancer
Palliative care
Psychosocial oncology
Supportive care
eHealth
Journal
The Lancet regional health. Europe
ISSN: 2666-7762
Titre abrégé: Lancet Reg Health Eur
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101777707
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Jul 2022
Historique:
entrez:
2
5
2022
pubmed:
3
5
2022
medline:
3
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Many patients with incurable cancer have symptoms affecting their health-related quality of life. The eHealth application 'Oncokompas' supports patients to take an active role in managing their palliative care needs, to reduce symptoms and improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine the efficacy of Oncokompas compared to care as usual among incurably ill cancer patients with a life expectancy of more than three months. Patients were recruited in six hospitals in the Netherlands. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to the intervention (direct access to Oncokompas) or the control group (access to Oncokompas after three months). The primary outcome measure was patient activation (i.e., patients' knowledge, skills and confidence for self-management). Secondary outcomes were general self-efficacy and HRQOL. Measures were assessed at baseline, two weeks after randomization, and three months after the baseline measurement. Linear mixed models were used to compare longitudinal changes between both groups from baseline to the three-month follow-up. In total, 219 patients were eligible of which 138 patients completed the baseline questionnaire (response rate 63%), and were randomized to the intervention (69) or control group (69). There were no significant differences between the intervention and control group over time in patient activation (estimated difference in change T0-T2; 1·8 (90% CI: -1·0 to 4·7)), neither in general self-efficacy and HRQOL. Of the patients in the intervention group who activated their account, 74% used Oncokompas as intended. The course of patient activation, general self-efficacy, and HRQOL was not significantly different between patients who used Oncokompas as intended versus those who did not. Among incurably ill cancer patients with a life expectancy of more than three months and recruited in the hospital setting, Oncokompas did not significantly improve patient activation, self-efficacy, or HRQOL. ZonMw, Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (844001105).
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Many patients with incurable cancer have symptoms affecting their health-related quality of life. The eHealth application 'Oncokompas' supports patients to take an active role in managing their palliative care needs, to reduce symptoms and improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine the efficacy of Oncokompas compared to care as usual among incurably ill cancer patients with a life expectancy of more than three months.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Patients were recruited in six hospitals in the Netherlands. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to the intervention (direct access to Oncokompas) or the control group (access to Oncokompas after three months). The primary outcome measure was patient activation (i.e., patients' knowledge, skills and confidence for self-management). Secondary outcomes were general self-efficacy and HRQOL. Measures were assessed at baseline, two weeks after randomization, and three months after the baseline measurement. Linear mixed models were used to compare longitudinal changes between both groups from baseline to the three-month follow-up.
Findings
UNASSIGNED
In total, 219 patients were eligible of which 138 patients completed the baseline questionnaire (response rate 63%), and were randomized to the intervention (69) or control group (69). There were no significant differences between the intervention and control group over time in patient activation (estimated difference in change T0-T2; 1·8 (90% CI: -1·0 to 4·7)), neither in general self-efficacy and HRQOL. Of the patients in the intervention group who activated their account, 74% used Oncokompas as intended. The course of patient activation, general self-efficacy, and HRQOL was not significantly different between patients who used Oncokompas as intended versus those who did not.
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
Among incurably ill cancer patients with a life expectancy of more than three months and recruited in the hospital setting, Oncokompas did not significantly improve patient activation, self-efficacy, or HRQOL.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
ZonMw, Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (844001105).
Identifiants
pubmed: 35496496
doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100390
pii: S2666-7762(22)00083-7
pmc: PMC9046636
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100390Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
IVdL reports grants from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF Kankerbestrijding), Bristol Myers Squibb, Danone Ecofund/Nutricia. ABC reports grants from Roche. FdV reports grants from Foundation STOPbraintumors.org and AbbVIe, BMS, Novartis, EORTC, Vaximm and BioClin Therapeutics. FdV reports participation on a DSMB during the conduct of this study, and leaderships or fiduciary roles in other boards and commissions. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Nov;30(6):e13497
pubmed: 34339081
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Apr 6;4(1):64
pubmed: 33824407
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 May 12;18(1):136
pubmed: 32398083
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Jul;34(1):94-104
pubmed: 17509812
Internet Interv. 2021 Jul 15;25:100429
pubmed: 34401388
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869
pubmed: 20332511
Palliat Med. 2020 Feb;34(2):160-178
pubmed: 32009565
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jan;100(1):5-7
pubmed: 27432014
Trials. 2020 Jan 31;21(1):124
pubmed: 32005280
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 1):1918-30
pubmed: 16336556
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Jun;15(6):353-60
pubmed: 19514801
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Apr;25(4):1323-1355
pubmed: 28058570
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 May 4;113(5):523-531
pubmed: 32525530
Support Care Cancer. 2016 May;24(5):2163-2171
pubmed: 26563178
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):80-94
pubmed: 31838009
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 1):1005-26
pubmed: 15230939
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013 Jul-Aug;35(4):332-8
pubmed: 23664503
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Oct 23;18(1):85
pubmed: 31647011
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 05;20(2):e41
pubmed: 29402759
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Apr 01;3(4):524-548
pubmed: 27918777
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Oct 1;6(10):1527-1528
pubmed: 32379855
Eur J Cancer. 2006 Jan;42(1):55-64
pubmed: 16162404
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Feb;15(1):77-86
pubmed: 32656739
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2020 May 1;47(3):305-317
pubmed: 32301927
Oncologist. 2021 Jun;26(6):e1058-e1065
pubmed: 33687742
Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1443-63
pubmed: 17610432
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 05;13(4):e111
pubmed: 22155738
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Aug;22(8):1175-1187
pubmed: 34224671
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Jan-Feb;61(1):50-62
pubmed: 21205833
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Oct 14;19(1):158
pubmed: 33054746
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Jan 21;4(1):e1
pubmed: 26795082
Psychooncology. 2018 Dec;27(12):2677-2686
pubmed: 30152074
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Oct;77(1):116-22
pubmed: 19356881