Evaluation of a transcriptomic signature of tuberculosis risk in combination with an interferon gamma release assay: A diagnostic test accuracy study.
Combination
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Performance
QuantiFERON
Signature
Transcriptomic
Journal
EClinicalMedicine
ISSN: 2589-5370
Titre abrégé: EClinicalMedicine
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101733727
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
received:
24
01
2022
revised:
25
03
2022
accepted:
29
03
2022
entrez:
2
5
2022
pubmed:
3
5
2022
medline:
3
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic performance of a transcriptomic signature of tuberculosis (TB) risk (RISK11) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold-plus (QFTPlus) as combination biomarkers of TB risk. Healthy South Africans who were HIV-negative aged 18-60 years with baseline RISK11 and QFTPlus results were evaluated in a prospective cohort study conducted between Sept 20, 2016 and Dec 20, 2019. Prevalence and incidence-rate ratios were used to evaluate risk of TB. Positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios were used to compare individual tests versus Both-Positive (RISK11+/QFTPlus+) and Either-Positive (RISK11+ or QFTPlus+) combinations. Among 2912 participants, prevalent TB in RISK11+/QFTPlus+ participants was 13·3-fold (95% CI 4·2-42·7) higher than RISK11-/QFTPlus-; 2·4-fold (95% CI 1·2-4·8) higher than RISK11+/QFTPlus-; and 4·5-fold (95% CI 2·5-8·0) higher than RISK11-/QFTPlus+ participants. Risk of incident TB in RISK11+/QFTPlus+ participants was 8·3-fold (95% CI 2·5-27·0) higher than RISK11-/QFTPlus-; 2·5-fold (95% CI 1·0-6·6) higher than RISK11+/QFTPlus-; and 2·1-fold (95% CI 1·2-3·4) higher than RISK11-/QFTPlus+ participants, respectively. Compared to QFTPlus, the Both-Positive test combination increased diagnostic LR+ from 1·3 (95% CI 1·2-1·5) to 4·7 (95% CI 3·2-7·0), and prognostic LR+ from 1·4 (95% CI 1·2-1·5) to 2·8 (95% CI 1·5-5·1), but did not improve upon RISK11 alone. Compared with RISK11, the Either-Positive test combination decreased diagnostic LR- from 0·7 (95% CI 0·6-0·9) to 0·3 (95% CI 0·2-0·6), and prognostic LR- from 0·9 (95% CI 0·8-1·0) to 0·3 (0·1-0·7), but did not improve upon QFTPlus alone. Combining two tests such as RISK11 and QFTPlus, with discordant individual performance characteristics does not improve overall discriminatory performance, relative to the individual tests. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, South African Medical Research Council.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
We evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic performance of a transcriptomic signature of tuberculosis (TB) risk (RISK11) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold-plus (QFTPlus) as combination biomarkers of TB risk.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Healthy South Africans who were HIV-negative aged 18-60 years with baseline RISK11 and QFTPlus results were evaluated in a prospective cohort study conducted between Sept 20, 2016 and Dec 20, 2019. Prevalence and incidence-rate ratios were used to evaluate risk of TB. Positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios were used to compare individual tests versus Both-Positive (RISK11+/QFTPlus+) and Either-Positive (RISK11+ or QFTPlus+) combinations.
Findings
UNASSIGNED
Among 2912 participants, prevalent TB in RISK11+/QFTPlus+ participants was 13·3-fold (95% CI 4·2-42·7) higher than RISK11-/QFTPlus-; 2·4-fold (95% CI 1·2-4·8) higher than RISK11+/QFTPlus-; and 4·5-fold (95% CI 2·5-8·0) higher than RISK11-/QFTPlus+ participants. Risk of incident TB in RISK11+/QFTPlus+ participants was 8·3-fold (95% CI 2·5-27·0) higher than RISK11-/QFTPlus-; 2·5-fold (95% CI 1·0-6·6) higher than RISK11+/QFTPlus-; and 2·1-fold (95% CI 1·2-3·4) higher than RISK11-/QFTPlus+ participants, respectively. Compared to QFTPlus, the Both-Positive test combination increased diagnostic LR+ from 1·3 (95% CI 1·2-1·5) to 4·7 (95% CI 3·2-7·0), and prognostic LR+ from 1·4 (95% CI 1·2-1·5) to 2·8 (95% CI 1·5-5·1), but did not improve upon RISK11 alone. Compared with RISK11, the Either-Positive test combination decreased diagnostic LR- from 0·7 (95% CI 0·6-0·9) to 0·3 (95% CI 0·2-0·6), and prognostic LR- from 0·9 (95% CI 0·8-1·0) to 0·3 (0·1-0·7), but did not improve upon QFTPlus alone.
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
Combining two tests such as RISK11 and QFTPlus, with discordant individual performance characteristics does not improve overall discriminatory performance, relative to the individual tests.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, South African Medical Research Council.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35497063
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101396
pii: S2589-5370(22)00126-2
pmc: PMC9046130
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101396Subventions
Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : D43 TW010559
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI154463
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
AP-N, GW, GC, TJS, and MH report grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, during the conduct of the study; AP-N and GW report grants from the South African Medical Research Council, during the conduct of the study; GW and TJS report grants from the South African National Research Foundation, during the conduct of the study. In addition, AP-N and TJS have a patent of the RISK11 and RISK6 signatures issued; GW has a patent “TB diagnostic markers” (PCT/IB2013/054377) issued and a patent “Method for diagnosing TB” (PCT/IB2017/052142) pending. All other authors had nothing to disclose.
Références
Biostatistics. 2000 Jun;1(2):123-40
pubmed: 12933515
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;21(3):354-365
pubmed: 33508224
Eur Respir J. 2012 Jul;40(1):161-8
pubmed: 22075479
J Infect. 2019 Nov;79(5):444-453
pubmed: 31473271
Stat Med. 2002 Sep 15;21(17):2527-46
pubmed: 12205697
Front Microbiol. 2018 Jun 15;9:1107
pubmed: 29973917
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Oct 31;15:94
pubmed: 26521228
PLoS Med. 2016 Oct 25;13(10):e1002152
pubmed: 27780211
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Apr;20(3):413-420
pubmed: 31220593
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;20(12):1457-1469
pubmed: 32673595
Nat Microbiol. 2019 May;4(5):748-758
pubmed: 30804546
Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2018 Jan;108:124-126
pubmed: 29523312
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 May;12(5):680-8
pubmed: 25699406
Med Phys. 2010 Nov;37(11):5821-30
pubmed: 21158294
Stat Med. 2000 Mar 15;19(5):649-63
pubmed: 10700737
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Aug;181(2):382-6
pubmed: 10454687
J Infect Chemother. 2018 Mar;24(3):188-192
pubmed: 29108749
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 15;201(8):984-991
pubmed: 31825645
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 21;15(8):e0237574
pubmed: 32822359
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014 Jan;27(1):3-20
pubmed: 24396134
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Jun;9(6):e841-e853
pubmed: 33862012
Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Apr;5(4):282-290
pubmed: 28215501
Lancet. 2016 Jun 4;387(10035):2312-2322
pubmed: 27017310
Thorax. 2018 Apr 5;:
pubmed: 29622693
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 29;6(3):e17984
pubmed: 21479236
Biostatistics. 2003 Jul;4(3):341-51
pubmed: 12925502