Impact of Right Ventricular Trabeculation on Right Ventricular Function in Patients With Left Ventricular Non-compaction Phenotype.

cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) left ventricular non-compaction non-comaption right ventricle (RV) right ventricular function trabecula trabeculation

Journal

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
ISSN: 2297-055X
Titre abrégé: Front Cardiovasc Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101653388

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 27 12 2021
accepted: 22 02 2022
entrez: 2 5 2022
pubmed: 3 5 2022
medline: 3 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Right ventricular (RV) involvement in left ventricular (LV) non-compaction (LVNC) remains unknown. We aimed to describe the RV volumetric, functional, and strain characteristics and clinical features of patients with LVNC phenotype and good LV ejection fraction (EF) using cardiac magnetic resonance to characterize RV trabeculation in LVNC and to study the relationships of RV and LV trabeculation with RV volume and function. This retrospective study included 100 Caucasian patients with LVNC phenotype and good LV-EF and 100 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Patients were further divided into two subgroups according to RV indexed trabecular mass [RV-TMi; patients with RV hypertrabeculation (RV-HT) vs. patients with normal RV trabeculation (RV-NT)]. We measured the LV and RV volumetric, functional, and TMi values using threshold-based postprocessing software and the RV and LV strain values using feature tracking and collected the patients' LVNC-related clinical features. Patients had higher RV volumes, lower RV-EF, and worse RV strain values than controls. A total of 22% of patients had RV-TMi values above the reference range; furthermore, RV-HT patients had higher RV and LV volumes, lower RV- and LV-EF, and worse RV strain values than RV-NT patients. We identified a strong positive correlation between RV- and LV-TMi and between RV-TMi and RV volumes and a significant inverse relationship of both RV- and LV-TMi with RV function. The prevalence of LVNC-related clinical features was similar in the RV-HT and RV-NT groups. These results suggest that some patients with LVNC phenotype might have RV non-compaction with subclinical RV dysfunction and without more severe clinical features.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35498016
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.843952
pmc: PMC9041027
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

843952

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Kiss, Gregor, Popovics, Grebur, Szabó, Dohy, Kovács, Lakatos, Merkely, Vágó and Szũcs.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Int J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 15;185:240-7
pubmed: 25804350
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 07;8:781393
pubmed: 34950717
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Oct;25(10):1050-7
pubmed: 22883316
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jul 5;46(1):101-5
pubmed: 15992642
J Card Fail. 2006 Dec;12(9):726-33
pubmed: 17174235
J Cardiol. 2020 Jan;75(1):20-26
pubmed: 31587941
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Sep;35(9):1683-1689
pubmed: 31037474
Heart. 2020 Dec;106(23):1798-1804
pubmed: 32895314
Circulation. 2008 Apr 1;117(13):1717-31
pubmed: 18378625
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2021 Feb 1;320(2):H912-H922
pubmed: 33337965
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jun;28(5):1123-31
pubmed: 21792620
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Mar;29(3):617-23
pubmed: 23053857
Pediatr Cardiol. 2010 May;31(4):576-8
pubmed: 20155258
Eur Heart J. 2010 May;31(9):1098-104
pubmed: 20089517
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 May 1;5(3):357-66
pubmed: 22499849
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020 Aug;33(8):995-1005.e1
pubmed: 32620323
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2018 Jul;23(4):e12487
pubmed: 28901675
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 May 21;18(1):30
pubmed: 27209219
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2018 Mar;34(3):
pubmed: 29124903
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jun 1;20(6):605-619
pubmed: 30903139
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 May;20(5):949-958
pubmed: 29741807
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2020 Mar;21(3):192-199
pubmed: 31895132
Circulation. 2013 Jun 4;127(22):2202-8
pubmed: 23633270
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Aug;36(2):493-500
pubmed: 10933363
Heart Fail Rev. 2019 May;24(3):315-323
pubmed: 30612215
Cardiol J. 2020 Jul 10;:
pubmed: 32648250
Eur Heart J. 2021 Jan 1;42(1):17-96
pubmed: 32860412
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Apr;29 Suppl 1:S126-38
pubmed: 16564701
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Apr;7(2):523-532
pubmed: 31800152
Lancet. 2015 Aug 22;386(9995):813-25
pubmed: 25865865
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 1;113(1):142-6
pubmed: 24176065
Heart Fail Clin. 2019 Apr;15(2):205-217
pubmed: 30832812
Heart Views. 2016 Jan-Mar;17(1):30-4
pubmed: 27293528

Auteurs

Anna Réka Kiss (AR)

Heart and Vascular Center of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Zsófia Gregor (Z)

Heart and Vascular Center of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Adrián Popovics (A)

Heart and Vascular Center of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Kinga Grebur (K)

Heart and Vascular Center of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Liliána Erzsébet Szabó (LE)

Heart and Vascular Center of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Zsófia Dohy (Z)

Heart and Vascular Center of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Attila Kovács (A)

Heart and Vascular Center of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Bálint Károly Lakatos (BK)

Heart and Vascular Center of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Béla Merkely (B)

Heart and Vascular Center of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Hajnalka Vágó (H)

Heart and Vascular Center of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Andrea Szũcs (A)

Heart and Vascular Center of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Classifications MeSH