Ambulatory Healthcare Use Profiles of Patients With Diabetes and Their Association With Quality of Care: A Cross-Sectional Study.


Journal

Frontiers in endocrinology
ISSN: 1664-2392
Titre abrégé: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555782

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 22 12 2021
accepted: 18 03 2022
entrez: 2 5 2022
pubmed: 3 5 2022
medline: 4 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Despite the growing burden of diabetes worldwide, evidence regarding the optimal models of care to improve the quality of diabetes care remains equivocal. This study aimed to identify profiles of patients with distinct ambulatory care use patterns and to examine the association of these profiles with the quality of diabetes care. We performed a cross-sectional study of the baseline data of 550 non-institutionalized adults included in a prospective, community-based, cohort study on diabetes care conducted in Switzerland. Clusters of participants with distinct patterns of ambulatory healthcare use were identified using discrete mixture models. To measure the quality of diabetes care, we used both processes of care indicators (eye and foot examination, microalbuminuria screening, blood cholesterol and glycated hemoglobin measurement [HbA1c], influenza immunization, blood pressure measurement, physical activity and diet advice) and outcome indicators (12-Item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-12], Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life [ADDQoL], Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care [PACIC], Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale, HbA1c value, and blood pressure <140/90 mmHg). For each profile of ambulatory healthcare use, we calculated adjusted probabilities of receiving processes of care and estimated adjusted outcomes of care using logistic and linear regression models, respectively. Four profiles of ambulatory healthcare use were identified: participants with more visits to the general practitioner [GP] than to the diabetologist and receiving concomitant podiatry care ("GP & podiatrist", n=86); participants visiting almost exclusively their GP ("GP only", n=195); participants with a substantially higher use of all ambulatory services ("High users", n=96); and participants reporting more visits to the diabetologist and less visits to the GP than other profiles ("Diabetologist first", n=173). Whereas participants belonging to the "GP only" profile were less likely to report most processes related to the quality of diabetes care, outcomes of care were relatively comparable across all ambulatory healthcare use profiles. Slight differences in quality of diabetes care appear across the four ambulatory healthcare use profiles identified in this study. Overall, however, results suggest that room for improvement exists in all profiles, and further investigation is necessary to determine whether individual characteristics (like diabetes-related factors) and/or healthcare factors contribute to the differences observed between profiles.

Sections du résumé

Background
Despite the growing burden of diabetes worldwide, evidence regarding the optimal models of care to improve the quality of diabetes care remains equivocal. This study aimed to identify profiles of patients with distinct ambulatory care use patterns and to examine the association of these profiles with the quality of diabetes care.
Methods
We performed a cross-sectional study of the baseline data of 550 non-institutionalized adults included in a prospective, community-based, cohort study on diabetes care conducted in Switzerland. Clusters of participants with distinct patterns of ambulatory healthcare use were identified using discrete mixture models. To measure the quality of diabetes care, we used both processes of care indicators (eye and foot examination, microalbuminuria screening, blood cholesterol and glycated hemoglobin measurement [HbA1c], influenza immunization, blood pressure measurement, physical activity and diet advice) and outcome indicators (12-Item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-12], Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life [ADDQoL], Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care [PACIC], Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale, HbA1c value, and blood pressure <140/90 mmHg). For each profile of ambulatory healthcare use, we calculated adjusted probabilities of receiving processes of care and estimated adjusted outcomes of care using logistic and linear regression models, respectively.
Results
Four profiles of ambulatory healthcare use were identified: participants with more visits to the general practitioner [GP] than to the diabetologist and receiving concomitant podiatry care ("GP & podiatrist", n=86); participants visiting almost exclusively their GP ("GP only", n=195); participants with a substantially higher use of all ambulatory services ("High users", n=96); and participants reporting more visits to the diabetologist and less visits to the GP than other profiles ("Diabetologist first", n=173). Whereas participants belonging to the "GP only" profile were less likely to report most processes related to the quality of diabetes care, outcomes of care were relatively comparable across all ambulatory healthcare use profiles.
Conclusions
Slight differences in quality of diabetes care appear across the four ambulatory healthcare use profiles identified in this study. Overall, however, results suggest that room for improvement exists in all profiles, and further investigation is necessary to determine whether individual characteristics (like diabetes-related factors) and/or healthcare factors contribute to the differences observed between profiles.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35498410
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.841774
pmc: PMC9043606
doi:

Substances chimiques

Glycated Hemoglobin A 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

841774

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Dupraz, Zuercher, Taffé and Peytremann-Bridevaux.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Jun;26(3):250-60
pubmed: 24737833
Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Dec;21(6):387-96
pubmed: 19734175
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 09;10(2):
pubmed: 35206948
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 3;18(1):121
pubmed: 30390641
Diabetes Care. 2005 Nov;28(11):2655-61
pubmed: 16249535
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jan 04;13:7
pubmed: 23289605
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Dec;25(6):704-9
pubmed: 24150483
PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232686
pubmed: 32369830
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Feb;8(1):
pubmed: 32094222
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jul 26;9:127
pubmed: 19630997
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Feb;175(2):257-65
pubmed: 25545780
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Oct 30;30(11):1945-1953
pubmed: 32998821
Syst Rev. 2013 May 07;2:26
pubmed: 23647654
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;138:201-210
pubmed: 29432773
Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33
pubmed: 8628042
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(57):1-210
pubmed: 26211920
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 7;17(1):533
pubmed: 28784176
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Mar 11;21(1):49
pubmed: 33706717
PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296
pubmed: 17941714
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2015 Jan 10;3(1):e000042
pubmed: 25621176
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 31;22(1):131
pubmed: 35101054
Public Health. 2021 Apr;193:10-16
pubmed: 33677392
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Mar 01;10:223-31
pubmed: 27042016
Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep;36(9):2628-38
pubmed: 23628621
Can J Diabetes. 2016 Feb;40(1):35-42
pubmed: 26778680
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 23;10(4):e032700
pubmed: 32332005
Diabetes Care. 2004 Feb;27(2):398-406
pubmed: 14747220
Med Care. 2001 May;39(5):491-9
pubmed: 11317097
Stat Methods Med Res. 1996 Jun;5(2):107-27
pubmed: 8817794
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020;16(1):95-99
pubmed: 31339794
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 14;15:329
pubmed: 26272346
Diabet Med. 2016 Jan;33(1):111-8
pubmed: 25981183
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 May;58(550):339-45
pubmed: 18482488
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Feb;16(1):6-11
pubmed: 17301194
Vaccine. 2020 Sep 29;38(42):6545-6552
pubmed: 32819730
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195243
pubmed: 29621280
Qual Life Res. 1999;8(1-2):79-91
pubmed: 10457741
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Jul;12(7):439-45
pubmed: 9229283
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 24;21(1):1734
pubmed: 34560879
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Dec 01;30(10):743-750
pubmed: 29733366
Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 13;8(1):202
pubmed: 31409423
Diabetes Care. 1997 Apr;20(4):472-5
pubmed: 9096962
Int J Clin Pract. 2014 Jan;68(1):40-8
pubmed: 24112108

Auteurs

Julien Dupraz (J)

Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Emilie Zuercher (E)

Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Patrick Taffé (P)

Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux (I)

Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH