Identification and verification of key taste components in wampee using widely targeted metabolomics.
Cultivar
Metabolomics
Sweet taste
Sweet–sour taste
Wampee
Journal
Food chemistry: X
ISSN: 2590-1575
Titre abrégé: Food Chem X
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101751436
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Mar 2022
30 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
23
11
2021
revised:
16
02
2022
accepted:
17
02
2022
entrez:
2
5
2022
pubmed:
3
5
2022
medline:
3
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Due to the lack of comprehensive evaluation of all metabolites in wampee, the metabolic reasons for taste differences are unclear. Here, two local varieties YF1 (sweet taste) and YF2 (sweet-sour taste), were selected for quality analysis, followed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) based widely targeted metabolomic analysis. YF1 and YF2 were clearly separated by principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis, and 449 metabolites were different between the cultivars, including 29 carbohydrates and 29 organic acids. Among them, d-galactose, d-mannose, and d-fructose 6-phosphate contributed mainly to the sweet taste of the YF1 wampee. l-citramalic acid, 2-hydroxyglutaric acid, and 3-methylmalic acid were the dominant organic acids in YF2 wampee, and therefore, contributed primarily to the sweet-sour taste. The differential metabolites were significantly enriched in the "ascorbate and aldarate metabolism" and "C5-branched dibasic acid metabolism" pathways. Ascorbate played a crucial role in the regulation of sugars and organic acids through those pathways. In addition, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) based quantitative verification exhibited the same specific cultivar variations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35499032
doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100261
pii: S2590-1575(22)00059-1
pmc: PMC9040002
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100261Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Plants (Basel). 2019 Nov 11;8(11):
pubmed: 31717908
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Oct 7;2020:3958098
pubmed: 33082823
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 28;12(2):e0172818
pubmed: 28245268
Food Chem. 2013 May 1;138(1):396-405
pubmed: 23265504
Food Chem. 2015 Apr 15;173:718-24
pubmed: 25466081
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D109-14
pubmed: 22080510
Food Chem (Oxf). 2021 Aug 05;3:100036
pubmed: 35415667
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 13;10(7):e0131408
pubmed: 26168247
Food Chem. 2015 Apr 1;172:86-91
pubmed: 25442527
Ann Bot. 2007 Jan;99(1):3-8
pubmed: 17098753
Food Chem. 2018 Sep 1;259:278-285
pubmed: 29680055
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2009;2009:612805
pubmed: 19657451
Food Res Int. 2020 Nov;137:109531
pubmed: 33233161
Fitoterapia. 2018 Jul;128:20-25
pubmed: 29723562
Food Chem. 2016 May 15;199:8-17
pubmed: 26775938
Molecules. 2019 Apr 09;24(7):
pubmed: 30970599
Food Chem. 2015 Jan 15;167:468-74
pubmed: 25149013
Mol Plant. 2013 Nov;6(6):1769-80
pubmed: 23702596
Food Chem. 2020 Apr 18;323:126822
pubmed: 32334307
Plant Physiol. 2021 Apr 23;185(4):1574-1594
pubmed: 33793952