Regional haemodynamic variables and perfusion index in the evaluation of sciatic nerve block: a prospective observational trial.
adult anaesthesia
anaesthesia in orthopaedics
pain management
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 05 2022
02 05 2022
Historique:
entrez:
2
5
2022
pubmed:
3
5
2022
medline:
6
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We determined whether regional haemodynamics and perfusion index (PI) could be reliable indicators of a successful sciatic nerve block (SNB). Prospective observational trial. A tertiary teaching hospital in China from April 2020 to August 2020. We assessed 79 patients for eligibility to participate in this study. Nine patients were excluded for not meeting our inclusion criteria, and three patients were excluded due to missing measurements at all time points. The patients underwent SNB. Pulsed-wave Doppler and PI measurements were performed. The primary outcome measure was the diagnostic power of regional haemodynamic change and PI to predict successful SNB. The secondary outcome measure was the effect of SNB on the regional haemodynamics and PI in the lower extremity. We assessed 79 patients in this study and 67 patients available for the final analysis. The SNB was successful in 59 patients and failed in eight patients. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the patients with successful and failed SNB. Starting from 10 min after SNB, the peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity, time-averaged maximum velocity and time-averaged mean velocity of the anterior tibial artery and posterior tibial artery of patients in the successful SNB group were significantly higher than those in the failed SNB group (p<0.05). The PSV percentage increase at 10 min after SNB has great potential to predict the block success. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values were 0.893 (95% CI 0.7809 to 1.000) and 0.880 (95% CI 0.7901 to 0.9699). The corresponding cut-off values were 19.22 and 35.88, respectively. The PI increased during 5-45 min intervals in patients with successful SNB. The AUC for the PI percentage increases at 10 min after SNB was 0.853 (95% CI 0.7035 to 1.000), with a cut-off value of 93.09. The regional haemodynamic variables, PSV and PI in particular, can be used as alternative indicators for clinicians to evaluate the success of SNB objectively and early. ChiCTR2000030772.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35501099
pii: bmjopen-2021-057283
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057283
pmc: PMC9062819
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dihydrotachysterol
R5LM3H112R
Banques de données
ChiCTR
['ChiCTR2000030772']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e057283Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Saudi J Anaesth. 2020 Oct-Dec;14(4):442-445
pubmed: 33447184
Anesth Analg. 2005 Jul;101(1):279-81, table of contents
pubmed: 15976245
Br J Anaesth. 2005 Jan;94(1):7-17
pubmed: 15277302
Anesthesiology. 2018 Aug;129(2):241-248
pubmed: 29762181
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;37(1):111-8
pubmed: 22030722
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Jun;106(6):887-95
pubmed: 21474476
Anesth Analg. 2012 May;114(5):1121-7
pubmed: 22366843
J Clin Monit Comput. 2013 Jun;27(3):325-8
pubmed: 23397432
Anaesthesia. 2016 Feb;71(2):213-27
pubmed: 26670119
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Oct;62(9):1280-1289
pubmed: 29938773
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Aug 01;119(2):276-280
pubmed: 28854539
Reg Anesth. 1997 May-Jun;22(3):223-8
pubmed: 9168212
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;41(4):430-7
pubmed: 27281720
Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):239-43, table of contents
pubmed: 16790660
Radiographics. 2008 May-Jun;28(3):691-706
pubmed: 18480479
J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Dec;34(6):1185-1191
pubmed: 31820214
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Aug;50(2):330-4
pubmed: 19446989
BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Dec 02;17(1):161
pubmed: 29197338
Anesth Analg. 2010 Mar 1;110(3):951-7
pubmed: 20007732
Minerva Anestesiol. 2019 Jul;85(7):746-755
pubmed: 30621372
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;36(6):548-52
pubmed: 22005661
Br J Anaesth. 2002 Aug;89(2):254-9
pubmed: 12378663
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;121(4):859-866
pubmed: 30236247
Can J Anaesth. 2012 Dec;59(12):1095-101
pubmed: 23055034
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Jan-Feb;32(1):73-8
pubmed: 17196496
Med Ultrason. 2016 Mar;18(1):64-9
pubmed: 26962556