Social alignment matters: Following pandemic guidelines is associated with better wellbeing.
Covid-19 lockdown
Mental health
Pandemic adherence
Social alignment
Social distancing
Wellbeing
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 05 2022
03 05 2022
Historique:
received:
21
09
2021
accepted:
30
03
2022
entrez:
3
5
2022
pubmed:
4
5
2022
medline:
6
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, most countries implemented physical distancing measures. Many mental health experts warned that through increasing social isolation and anxiety, these measures could negatively affect psychosocial wellbeing. However, socially aligning with others by adhering to these measures may also be beneficial for wellbeing. We examined these two contrasting hypotheses using cross-national survey data (N = 6675) collected fortnightly from participants in 115 countries over 3 months at the beginning of the pandemic. Participants reported their wellbeing, perceptions of how vulnerable they were to Covid-19 (i.e., high risk of infection) and how much they, and others in their social circle and country, were adhering to the distancing measures. Linear mixed-effects models showed that being a woman, having lower educational attainment, living alone and perceived high vulnerability to Covid-19 were risk factors for poorer wellbeing. Being young (18-25) was associated with lower wellbeing, but longitudinal analyses showed that young people's wellbeing improved over 3 months. In contrast to widespread views that physical distancing measures negatively affect wellbeing, results showed that following the guidelines was positively associated with wellbeing even for people in high-risk groups. These findings provide an important counterpart to the idea that pandemic containment measures such as physical distancing negatively impacted wellbeing unequivocally. Despite the overall burden of the pandemic on psychosocial wellbeing, social alignment with others can still contribute to positive wellbeing. The pandemic has manifested our propensity to adapt to challenges, particularly highlighting how social alignment can forge resilience.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, most countries implemented physical distancing measures. Many mental health experts warned that through increasing social isolation and anxiety, these measures could negatively affect psychosocial wellbeing. However, socially aligning with others by adhering to these measures may also be beneficial for wellbeing.
METHODS
We examined these two contrasting hypotheses using cross-national survey data (N = 6675) collected fortnightly from participants in 115 countries over 3 months at the beginning of the pandemic. Participants reported their wellbeing, perceptions of how vulnerable they were to Covid-19 (i.e., high risk of infection) and how much they, and others in their social circle and country, were adhering to the distancing measures.
RESULTS
Linear mixed-effects models showed that being a woman, having lower educational attainment, living alone and perceived high vulnerability to Covid-19 were risk factors for poorer wellbeing. Being young (18-25) was associated with lower wellbeing, but longitudinal analyses showed that young people's wellbeing improved over 3 months. In contrast to widespread views that physical distancing measures negatively affect wellbeing, results showed that following the guidelines was positively associated with wellbeing even for people in high-risk groups.
CONCLUSIONS
These findings provide an important counterpart to the idea that pandemic containment measures such as physical distancing negatively impacted wellbeing unequivocally. Despite the overall burden of the pandemic on psychosocial wellbeing, social alignment with others can still contribute to positive wellbeing. The pandemic has manifested our propensity to adapt to challenges, particularly highlighting how social alignment can forge resilience.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35501759
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13130-y
pii: 10.1186/s12889-022-13130-y
pmc: PMC9060841
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
821Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 25;10:1453
pubmed: 31293486
BJU Int. 2015 Jan;115(1):143-52
pubmed: 24958472
J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 May-Jun;32(3):521-535
pubmed: 34230792
J Adult Dev. 2010 Jun;17(2):110-119
pubmed: 20502508
Psychol Med. 2021 Apr;51(6):881-893
pubmed: 33648613
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 24;15(9):e0239698
pubmed: 32970764
Psychol Med. 2021 Jan 13;:1-10
pubmed: 33436126
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 11;11:594115
pubmed: 33262714
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015 May-Jun;6(3):209-19
pubmed: 26263225
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Oct;94:26-33
pubmed: 23931942
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Mar;23(3):174-186
pubmed: 30679099
J Affect Disord. 2021 Aug 1;291:331-337
pubmed: 34087628
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Oct;89:531-542
pubmed: 32485289
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Nov 30;245:282-290
pubmed: 27565700
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 02;11:568907
pubmed: 33132977
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 05;16:15
pubmed: 26733272
Hum Nat. 2003 Mar;14(1):53-72
pubmed: 26189988
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Mar 16;55(2):93-102
pubmed: 33555336
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):547-560
pubmed: 32304649
Qual Life Res. 2014 Apr;23(3):857-68
pubmed: 24005886
Hum Nat. 1995 Sep;6(3):273-90
pubmed: 24203093
BMJ. 1997 Apr 5;314(7086):1037-40
pubmed: 9112854
Gerontologist. 2021 Jan 21;61(1):103-113
pubmed: 33125065
Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Oct;60(4):1403-1418
pubmed: 33969899
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Jan;271:502-509
pubmed: 30551082
J Affect Disord. 2020 Nov 1;276:446-452
pubmed: 32871676
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Jun;3(6):554-559
pubmed: 31011162
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Sep;291:113138
pubmed: 32562931
Curr Biol. 2020 May 18;30(10):R417-R419
pubmed: 32428465
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Nov 27;5:63
pubmed: 18042300
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Aug;74:102258
pubmed: 32569905
Psychol Med. 2021 Jan;51(2):201-211
pubmed: 33436130
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):883-892
pubmed: 32707037