No difference in clinical outcome, pain, and range of motion between fixed and mobile bearing Attune total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-center trial.
Fixed bearing
Mobile bearing
Total knee arthroplasty
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 May 2022
02 May 2022
Historique:
received:
02
11
2021
accepted:
25
04
2022
entrez:
3
5
2022
pubmed:
4
5
2022
medline:
6
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite numerous scientific investigations, the tribological advantages of mobile bearing inserts have not been sustainably confirmed or refuted for modern knee prostheses in clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to compare fixed and mobile bearing inserts in order to draw conclusions regarding clinical benefits. The present prospective single center cohort study of 2 non-randomized stratified groups consisted of 67 patients. All included patients received cemented total knee arthroplasty (Attune®) due to osteoarthritis. 34 patients were treated with a mobile and 33 patients with a fixed insert. The WOMAC score and the Visual Analogue Scale was used for the subjective assessment of success, while the Knee-Society-Score was used considering the Range of Motion for the objective assessment. The subjective and the clinical scores showed improvements for both compared groups postoperatively at 2 years of minimum follow-up. The overall postoperative results of the WOMAC score, the Knee-Society-Score and the Visual Analogue Scale presented no statistically difference between the compared groups (p > 0,05). The postoperative ROM showed a superior improvement of 13.2° ± 18.4° in the mobile-bearing group versus 4.9° ± 18.4° (p = 0.017) in the fixed-bearing group. The flexion of the knee joint was 114° ± 10.1° for the mobile-bearings and 109.2° ± 7.2° for fixed bearings (p = 0.012). According to the findings, both inserts showed overall promising postoperative results, in terms of objective as well as subjective parameters, without clinically relevant significant differences, except for ROM, which was superior in the mobile bearing group. The present clinical trial has been registered at the ISRCTN registry with the reverence number ISRCTN15117998 on 04/04/2022.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite numerous scientific investigations, the tribological advantages of mobile bearing inserts have not been sustainably confirmed or refuted for modern knee prostheses in clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to compare fixed and mobile bearing inserts in order to draw conclusions regarding clinical benefits.
METHODS
METHODS
The present prospective single center cohort study of 2 non-randomized stratified groups consisted of 67 patients. All included patients received cemented total knee arthroplasty (Attune®) due to osteoarthritis. 34 patients were treated with a mobile and 33 patients with a fixed insert. The WOMAC score and the Visual Analogue Scale was used for the subjective assessment of success, while the Knee-Society-Score was used considering the Range of Motion for the objective assessment. The subjective and the clinical scores showed improvements for both compared groups postoperatively at 2 years of minimum follow-up.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The overall postoperative results of the WOMAC score, the Knee-Society-Score and the Visual Analogue Scale presented no statistically difference between the compared groups (p > 0,05). The postoperative ROM showed a superior improvement of 13.2° ± 18.4° in the mobile-bearing group versus 4.9° ± 18.4° (p = 0.017) in the fixed-bearing group. The flexion of the knee joint was 114° ± 10.1° for the mobile-bearings and 109.2° ± 7.2° for fixed bearings (p = 0.012).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
According to the findings, both inserts showed overall promising postoperative results, in terms of objective as well as subjective parameters, without clinically relevant significant differences, except for ROM, which was superior in the mobile bearing group. The present clinical trial has been registered at the ISRCTN registry with the reverence number ISRCTN15117998 on 04/04/2022.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35501786
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05382-x
pii: 10.1186/s12891-022-05382-x
pmc: PMC9063062
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
413Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Acta Biomed. 2019 Oct 29;90(12-S):98-103
pubmed: 31821292
Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):614-24
pubmed: 23140091
J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Mar;26(3):127-8
pubmed: 22330974
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Jul;22(7):1626-31
pubmed: 23269476
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):20-32
pubmed: 22065240
Knee. 2014 Jan;21(1):151-5
pubmed: 24145068
J Arthroplasty. 2005 Feb;20(2):145-53
pubmed: 15902852
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Sep;26(6):877-82
pubmed: 21530149
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov;(428):221-7
pubmed: 15534546
World J Surg. 2008 Jun;32(6):952
pubmed: 18401640
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jun;25(6):1757-1777
pubmed: 27324479
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 May-Aug;26(3):2309499018808356
pubmed: 30369289
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Mar 21;94(6):481-9
pubmed: 22437996
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Nov;(404):40-50
pubmed: 12439236
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jul;448:114-21
pubmed: 16826105
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):33-44
pubmed: 22006197
J Biomech. 2007;40 Suppl 1:S25-30
pubmed: 17433337
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Oct;18(10):1345-51
pubmed: 20556357
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Dec;29(12):2393-6
pubmed: 24698817
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jun 19;95(12):e83
pubmed: 23783214
J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40
pubmed: 3068365
Bone Joint J. 2013 Sep;95-B(9):1209-16
pubmed: 23997134
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Sep;91(9):2104-12
pubmed: 19723986
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015 Apr;10(4):487-95
pubmed: 24965187
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Nov;(392):101-15
pubmed: 11716371
Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:431-49
pubmed: 11372345
Acta Orthop. 2018 Apr;89(2):190-196
pubmed: 29448880
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Nov 7;94(21):1929-35
pubmed: 23138235
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8):1329-32
pubmed: 23602418
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jul;100-B(7):925-929
pubmed: 29954199
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Oct 2;95(19):e1411-11
pubmed: 24088976
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jun;25(6):1749-1756
pubmed: 28332044
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Jul;14(7):605-11
pubmed: 16362360
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Jul;22(7):1612-8
pubmed: 23232786