Budget Impact Analysis of Mepolizumab for Eligible Patients in the Setting of a Severe Asthma Clinic Within Dubai Health Authority (DHA).
anti-IL5
asthma phenotypes
eosinophil count
exacerbations
treatment cost
Journal
ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR
ISSN: 1178-6981
Titre abrégé: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101560564
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
21
12
2021
accepted:
05
04
2022
entrez:
3
5
2022
pubmed:
4
5
2022
medline:
4
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To estimate 5-years budgetary impact of introducing mepolizumab to eligible patients with uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma treated at a tertiary care hospital within Dubai Health Authority (DHA). A budget impact analysis (BIA) model was adapted to the setting of Rashid Hospital, DHA to estimate the budgetary implications of introducing first-in-class anti-IL5 (mepolizumab) as add-on therapy for eligible patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. The eligible patient population (n=60) was estimated from aggregate data provided by the clinic. Patients were eligible to treatment with mepolizumab if they had ≥2 exacerbation in the previous year and eosinophil count ≥150 cell/µL. The analysis compared the cost of treating patients in two alternative scenarios; a scenario where patients are treated with optimized usual care or with available biologic as add-on therapy, and a second scenario where mepolizumab is fully accessible to eligible patients. Administration of mepolizumab to eligible patients at Rashid Hospital is predicted to result in overall savings estimated at £270,545 over a 5-year time horizon. Exacerbation rates could not be indirectly compared for mepolizumab and omalizumab, since treatment continuation rules were defined differently. Therefore, these parameters were directly taken from the clinical trials for mepolizumab and omalizumab. The savings were estimated due to drug acquisition costs (£269,900) and estimated reduction in exacerbation (n=15). One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the model results was most sensitive to changing the method of calculating omalizumab dose and varying the drug acquisition cost of omalizumab by ±20%. The BIA showed that full accessibility of mepolizumab to eligible severe asthma patients is predicted to be budget saving in the Dubai Health Authority. This evaluation is relevant to healthcare decision making as it demonstrates that mepolizumab is budget saving for eligible patients, while reducing burden by improving their control and symptoms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35502155
doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S343249
pii: 343249
pmc: PMC9056102
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
265-279Informations de copyright
© 2022 The GSK group of companies.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
BM has no potential or competing conflicts of interest, AM, IEA, TL, RG & SN are full-time employees of GSK, SN is also shareholder in GSK. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Front Physiol. 2019 Dec 17;10:1514
pubmed: 31920718
Eur Respir J. 2019 Jan 3;53(1):
pubmed: 30578390
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 9;11(1):5453
pubmed: 33750842
Swiss Med Wkly. 2009 May 16;139(19-20):274-7
pubmed: 19452289
Nat Med. 2012 May 04;18(5):716-25
pubmed: 22561835
Allergy. 2005 Mar;60(3):309-16
pubmed: 15679715
Eur Respir J. 2014 Feb;43(2):343-73
pubmed: 24337046
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009 Aug;13(8):1015-22
pubmed: 19723383
Value Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):5-14
pubmed: 24438712
Allergy. 2011 May;66(5):671-8
pubmed: 21255035
BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Aug 25;16(1):128
pubmed: 27562427
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Dec;136(6):1488-1495
pubmed: 26414880
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Jan;143(1):190-200.e20
pubmed: 30205189
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 25;371(13):1198-207
pubmed: 25199059
J Asthma. 2018 Feb;55(2):152-160
pubmed: 28622052
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Feb;71(1):68-77
pubmed: 25497995
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 25;371(13):1189-97
pubmed: 25199060
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020 Jan-Dec;14:1753466620929231
pubmed: 32482128
J Clin Med. 2019 Sep 02;8(9):
pubmed: 31480806
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019 Apr;56(2):219-233
pubmed: 30206782