Circadian Type Determines Working Ability: Poorer Working Ability in Evening-Types is Mediated by Insufficient Sleep in a Large Population-Based Sample of Working-Age Adults.
burnout
chronotype
circadian rhythms
epidemiology
sleep
work wellbeing
Journal
Nature and science of sleep
ISSN: 1179-1608
Titre abrégé: Nat Sci Sleep
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101537767
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
08
01
2022
accepted:
23
03
2022
entrez:
3
5
2022
pubmed:
4
5
2022
medline:
4
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Circadian phenotype has a crucial role in determining wellbeing and health prospective. Evening-types have higher risk for sleep and mental health problems, which is also reflected in work wellbeing. However, there are no population-based studies examining the association of working ability and circadian typology at different working-age-groups. Also, the role of predisposing factors, ie, sleep-related differences between circadian types, has not been studied in relation to working ability among circadian types in a population-based sample. In this population-based sample of 13,114 working-age Finnish adults from 18 to 64 years of age, we examined the associations between circadian type, exhaustion and working ability and the roles of sleep-wake rhythm misalignment and insufficient sleep on these associations in 10-years-wide age-groups. Circadian type was assessed with the widely-used single item for self-assessed morningness/eveningness from the Horne-Östberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ). Evening-types, especially definite evening-types, were more exhausted and had poorer working ability than morning-types. Higher exhaustion among evening-types was apparent in all working ages with a peak at ages 45 to 54 years. Poorer working ability in definite evening-types as compared to definite morning-types was found only at ages 35 to 54 years. Evening-types, especially definite-evening-types, had also more social jet lag and they reported more insufficient sleep than definite morning-types. More frequent insufficient sleep associated with poorer working ability and partly mediated the association between circadian type and working ability. Circadian phenotypes were found to differ in risk for exhaustion and in working ability, and this association was partly mediated by insufficient sleep. Our findings emphasize the importance to improve sleep especially among evening-types to ensure better work wellbeing.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Circadian phenotype has a crucial role in determining wellbeing and health prospective. Evening-types have higher risk for sleep and mental health problems, which is also reflected in work wellbeing. However, there are no population-based studies examining the association of working ability and circadian typology at different working-age-groups. Also, the role of predisposing factors, ie, sleep-related differences between circadian types, has not been studied in relation to working ability among circadian types in a population-based sample.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
In this population-based sample of 13,114 working-age Finnish adults from 18 to 64 years of age, we examined the associations between circadian type, exhaustion and working ability and the roles of sleep-wake rhythm misalignment and insufficient sleep on these associations in 10-years-wide age-groups. Circadian type was assessed with the widely-used single item for self-assessed morningness/eveningness from the Horne-Östberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ).
Results
UNASSIGNED
Evening-types, especially definite evening-types, were more exhausted and had poorer working ability than morning-types. Higher exhaustion among evening-types was apparent in all working ages with a peak at ages 45 to 54 years. Poorer working ability in definite evening-types as compared to definite morning-types was found only at ages 35 to 54 years. Evening-types, especially definite-evening-types, had also more social jet lag and they reported more insufficient sleep than definite morning-types. More frequent insufficient sleep associated with poorer working ability and partly mediated the association between circadian type and working ability.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Circadian phenotypes were found to differ in risk for exhaustion and in working ability, and this association was partly mediated by insufficient sleep. Our findings emphasize the importance to improve sleep especially among evening-types to ensure better work wellbeing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35502230
doi: 10.2147/NSS.S356060
pii: 356060
pmc: PMC9056046
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
829-841Informations de copyright
© 2022 Merikanto et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Timo Partonen reports personal fees from Speakersforum Finland outside the submitted work; in addition, Timo Partonen has a patent, EPO Patent No. EP 3503794 pending to proprietor: Night Train Oy, Oulu, Finland. There are no competing financial interests. The authors report no conflicts of interest related to this work.
Références
J Sleep Res. 1999 Dec;8(4):291-5
pubmed: 10646169
Chronobiol Int. 2012 Apr;29(3):311-7
pubmed: 22390244
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Nov 23;2020:5764017
pubmed: 33381558
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2007;72:579-97
pubmed: 18419318
J Biol Rhythms. 2020 Feb;35(1):98-110
pubmed: 31791166
Sleep. 2013 Jul 01;36(7):1059-1068
pubmed: 23814343
Scand J Public Health. 2008 Sep;36(7):737-43
pubmed: 18684778
Sleep Med Rev. 2007 Dec;11(6):429-38
pubmed: 17936039
Occup Environ Med. 2014 Apr;71(4):295-301
pubmed: 24169931
Sleep Med. 2018 Oct;50:36-41
pubmed: 29982088
J Affect Disord. 2011 Dec;135(1-3):10-9
pubmed: 21300408
J Investig Med. 1999 Mar;47(3):141-50
pubmed: 10198570
J Affect Disord. 2015 Dec 1;188:143-8
pubmed: 26363264
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;26(2):139-54
pubmed: 24892891
Sleep Med. 2020 Nov;75:368-379
pubmed: 32950882
Sleep Med. 2021 Apr;80:322-332
pubmed: 33631501
Chronobiol Int. 2006;23(1-2):497-509
pubmed: 16687322
Chronobiol Int. 2014 Mar;31(2):182-8
pubmed: 24131152
J Occup Health Psychol. 1998 Oct;3(4):322-55
pubmed: 9805280
Nat Sci Sleep. 2021 Feb 16;13:219-228
pubmed: 33623463
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Apr;18(4):508-21
pubmed: 16768357
Behav Neurosci. 2001 Aug;115(4):895-9
pubmed: 11508728
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1545-1602
pubmed: 27733282
Behav Sleep Med. 2017 Sep-Oct;15(5):394-409
pubmed: 27158937
Occup Environ Med. 2021 Feb 23;:
pubmed: 33622783
Depress Anxiety. 2021 Oct;38(10):1066-1077
pubmed: 34170060
Nature. 2002 Aug 29;418(6901):935-41
pubmed: 12198538
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;66(10):1254-69
pubmed: 16259539
Nord J Psychiatry. 2016;70(1):72-80
pubmed: 26118822
Biology (Basel). 2019 Jul 12;8(3):
pubmed: 31336976
J Sleep Res. 2017 Apr;26(2):210-218
pubmed: 27758010
J Biol Rhythms. 2003 Feb;18(1):80-90
pubmed: 12568247
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 29;10(1):343
pubmed: 30696823
Chronobiol Int. 2016;33(6):721-9
pubmed: 27092579
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2013;(444):2-15
pubmed: 23909692
Int J Chronobiol. 1976;4(2):97-110
pubmed: 1027738