Order Substitutions and Education for Balanced Crystalloid Solution Use in an Integrated Health Care System and Association With Major Adverse Kidney Events.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 05 2022
02 05 2022
Historique:
entrez:
3
5
2022
pubmed:
4
5
2022
medline:
6
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Trials comparing balanced crystalloids with normal saline have yielded mixed results regarding reductions in kidney complications and mortality for hospitalized patients receiving intravenous fluids. To evaluate the association of a multifaceted implementation program encouraging the preferential use of lactated Ringer solution with patient outcomes and intravenous fluid-prescribing practices in a large, multilevel health care system. This type 2 hybrid implementation and comparative effectiveness study enrolled all patients 18 years or older who received 1 L or more of intravenous fluids while admitted to an emergency department and/or inpatient unit at 1 of 22 hospitals in Idaho and Utah between November 1, 2018, and February 29, 2020. An interrupted time series analysis was used to assess study outcomes before and after interventions to encourage use of lactated Ringer solution. Implementation program combining order set modification, electronic order entry alerts, and sequential clinician-targeted education to encourage prescribing of lactated Ringer solution instead of normal saline. The primary implementation outcome was the patient-level proportion of intravenous fluids that was balanced crystalloids. The primary effectiveness outcome was the incidence of major adverse kidney events (MAKE30)-a composite of new persistent kidney dysfunction, new initiation of dialysis, and death-at 30 days. Among 148 423 patients (median [IQR] age, 47 [30-67] years; 91 302 women [61%]), the proportion of total fluids received that was lactated Ringer solution increased from 28% to 75% in the first week vs the last week of the study (immediate implementation effect odds ratio [OR], 3.44; 95% CI, 2.79-4.24). The estimated MAKE30 absolute risk reduction was 2.2% (95% CI, 1.3%-3.3%) based on interrupted time series analysis showing a decrease in the week-on-week trend for MAKE30 (OR difference, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.03-0.03, P < .001). The immediate postimplementation OR for MAKE30 was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.76-1.01), with a decrease in persistent kidney dysfunction (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.93) and mortality (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93) but not dialysis (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.76-1.32). In this comparative effectiveness study, an implementation program was associated with an increase in the proportion of fluids administered as lactated Ringer solution compared with normal saline and was associated with a reduction in MAKE30 events among patients treated in a large integrated health care system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35503217
pii: 2791804
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10046
pmc: PMC9066288
doi:
Substances chimiques
Crystalloid Solutions
0
Isotonic Solutions
0
Ringer's Lactate
0
Saline Solution
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2210046Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : K23 GM129661
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 1;378(9):819-828
pubmed: 29485926
Anesthesiology. 1999 May;90(5):1265-70
pubmed: 10319771
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
JAMA. 2021 Aug 10;:
pubmed: 34375396
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S38-44
pubmed: 24268083
Shock. 1998 May;9(5):364-8
pubmed: 9617887
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Oct 9;160(18):2741-7
pubmed: 11025783
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Dec;40(12):1897-905
pubmed: 25293535
JAMA. 2015 Oct 27;314(16):1701-10
pubmed: 26444692
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 1;378(9):829-839
pubmed: 29485925
JAMA. 1993 Dec 22-29;270(24):2957-63
pubmed: 8254858
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 Dec;25(12):3911-8
pubmed: 20100732
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec 15;200(12):1487-1495
pubmed: 31454263
J Crit Care. 2021 Jun;63:250-253
pubmed: 33500146
BMJ. 2015 Jun 09;350:h2750
pubmed: 26058820
Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):18-24
pubmed: 22580944
JAMA. 2021 Aug 10;:
pubmed: 34375394
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 26;369(13):1243-51
pubmed: 24066745
Anesthesiology. 1999 May;90(5):1247-9
pubmed: 10319767
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Feb;19(2):155-160
pubmed: 29394222
Anesthesiology. 2020 Apr;132(4):614-624
pubmed: 31977517
PLoS Med. 2005 Sep;2(9):e255
pubmed: 16128621
Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):e146-e153
pubmed: 27635770
Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1938-44
pubmed: 26154934
Crit Care. 2004 Aug;8(4):R204-12
pubmed: 15312219
Clin Nutr. 2008 Apr;27(2):179-88
pubmed: 18313809
Chest. 2021 Feb;159(2):585-595
pubmed: 32882244
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 19;7:CD012247
pubmed: 31334842
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Feb;29(2):249-56
pubmed: 12536271
J Intensive Care. 2018 Aug 17;6:51
pubmed: 30140441