Effects of a Novel Blood Glucose Forecasting Feature on Glycemic Management and Logging in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Using One Drop: Retrospective Cohort Study.
blood glucose
blood glucose forecast
blood glucose logging
cohort
diabetes
digital health
forecast
health forecasting
mHealth
machine learning
model
monitoring
precision
precision health
retrospective
smartphone
type 2 diabetes
Journal
JMIR diabetes
ISSN: 2371-4379
Titre abrégé: JMIR Diabetes
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101719410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 May 2022
03 May 2022
Historique:
received:
01
11
2021
accepted:
16
04
2022
revised:
01
12
2021
entrez:
3
5
2022
pubmed:
4
5
2022
medline:
4
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Personalized feedback is an effective behavior change technique frequently incorporated into mobile health (mHealth) apps. Innovations in data science create opportunities for leveraging the wealth of user data accumulated by mHealth apps to generate personalized health forecasts. One Drop's digital program is one of the first to implement blood glucose forecasts for people with type 2 diabetes. The impact of these forecasts on behavior and glycemic management has not been evaluated to date. This study sought to evaluate the impact of exposure to blood glucose forecasts on blood glucose logging behavior, average blood glucose, and percentage of glucose points in range. This retrospective cohort study examined people with type 2 diabetes who first began using One Drop to record their blood glucose between 2019 and 2021. Cohorts included those who received blood glucose forecasts and those who did not receive forecasts. The cohorts were compared to evaluate the effect of exposure to blood glucose forecasts on logging activity, average glucose, and percentage of glucose readings in range, after controlling for potential confounding factors. Data were analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and regression analyses. Data from a total of 1411 One Drop users with type 2 diabetes and elevated baseline glucose were analyzed. Participants (60.6% male, 795/1311; mean age 50.2 years, SD 11.8) had diabetes for 7.1 years on average (SD 7.9). After controlling for potential confounding factors, blood glucose forecasts were associated with more frequent blood glucose logging (P=.004), lower average blood glucose (P<.001), and a higher percentage of readings in range (P=.03) after 12 weeks. Blood glucose logging partially mediated the relationship between exposure to forecasts and average glucose. Individuals who received blood glucose forecasts had significantly lower average glucose, with a greater amount of glucose measurements in a healthy range after 12 weeks compared to those who did not receive forecasts. Glucose logging was identified as a partial mediator of the relationship between forecast exposure and week-12 average glucose, highlighting a potential mechanism through which glucose forecasts exert their effect. When administered as a part of a comprehensive mHealth program, blood glucose forecasts may significantly improve glycemic management among people living with type 2 diabetes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Personalized feedback is an effective behavior change technique frequently incorporated into mobile health (mHealth) apps. Innovations in data science create opportunities for leveraging the wealth of user data accumulated by mHealth apps to generate personalized health forecasts. One Drop's digital program is one of the first to implement blood glucose forecasts for people with type 2 diabetes. The impact of these forecasts on behavior and glycemic management has not been evaluated to date.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study sought to evaluate the impact of exposure to blood glucose forecasts on blood glucose logging behavior, average blood glucose, and percentage of glucose points in range.
METHODS
METHODS
This retrospective cohort study examined people with type 2 diabetes who first began using One Drop to record their blood glucose between 2019 and 2021. Cohorts included those who received blood glucose forecasts and those who did not receive forecasts. The cohorts were compared to evaluate the effect of exposure to blood glucose forecasts on logging activity, average glucose, and percentage of glucose readings in range, after controlling for potential confounding factors. Data were analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and regression analyses.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Data from a total of 1411 One Drop users with type 2 diabetes and elevated baseline glucose were analyzed. Participants (60.6% male, 795/1311; mean age 50.2 years, SD 11.8) had diabetes for 7.1 years on average (SD 7.9). After controlling for potential confounding factors, blood glucose forecasts were associated with more frequent blood glucose logging (P=.004), lower average blood glucose (P<.001), and a higher percentage of readings in range (P=.03) after 12 weeks. Blood glucose logging partially mediated the relationship between exposure to forecasts and average glucose.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Individuals who received blood glucose forecasts had significantly lower average glucose, with a greater amount of glucose measurements in a healthy range after 12 weeks compared to those who did not receive forecasts. Glucose logging was identified as a partial mediator of the relationship between forecast exposure and week-12 average glucose, highlighting a potential mechanism through which glucose forecasts exert their effect. When administered as a part of a comprehensive mHealth program, blood glucose forecasts may significantly improve glycemic management among people living with type 2 diabetes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35503521
pii: v7i2e34624
doi: 10.2196/34624
pmc: PMC9115662
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e34624Informations de copyright
©Steven D Imrisek, Matthew Lee, Dan Goldner, Harpreet Nagra, Lindsey M Lavaysse, Jamillah Hoy-Rosas, Jeff Dachis, Lindsay E Sears. Originally published in JMIR Diabetes (https://diabetes.jmir.org), 03.05.2022.
Références
Mhealth. 2020 Oct 05;6:40
pubmed: 33437836
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Mar 30;67(12):359-361
pubmed: 29596402
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):139
pubmed: 30594159
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 11;19(7):e234
pubmed: 28698167
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 21;76(3):306-320
pubmed: 32674794
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 16;7(1):e11848
pubmed: 30303485
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 15;23(7):e23227
pubmed: 34264192
Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):917-928
pubmed: 29567642
JMIR Diabetes. 2021 Jun 2;6(2):e28033
pubmed: 34075880
Diabetes Care. 2008 Aug;31(8):1473-8
pubmed: 18540046
Diabetes Educ. 2018 Jun;44(3):226-236
pubmed: 29575982
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91
pubmed: 18697684
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 18;11(11):e0166718
pubmed: 27861583
Diabetes Care. 2019 Mar;42(3):400-405
pubmed: 30352896
Comput Inform Nurs. 2016 Feb;34(2):71-6; quiz 99
pubmed: 26657619
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 10;7(1):e10321
pubmed: 30632972
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jun 16;5(6):e25151
pubmed: 34132640
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 May 01;7(3):689-98
pubmed: 23759402
Milbank Q. 2010 Jun;88(2):256-76
pubmed: 20579285
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Apr 29;13(2):e35
pubmed: 21531690
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 10;23(3):e21435
pubmed: 33688832
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020 Mar;10(1):107-111
pubmed: 32175717
Diabetes Care. 2016 Nov;39(11):2089-2095
pubmed: 27926892
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015 Dec;62(12):2735-49
pubmed: 26292334
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S53-S72
pubmed: 33298416
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013 Nov;102(2):86-95
pubmed: 24128999
JMIR Diabetes. 2017 Aug 24;2(2):e21
pubmed: 30291059
Comput Inform Nurs. 2019 Jul;37(7):340-348
pubmed: 31136332
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Sep 24;30(10):1800-1805
pubmed: 32669240
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 12;22(8):e18911
pubmed: 32784178
Adv Ther. 2018 Nov;35(11):1763-1774
pubmed: 30357570
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Mar 01;10:135
pubmed: 30881349
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 25;14:646
pubmed: 24965805
Cell. 2015 Nov 19;163(5):1079-1094
pubmed: 26590418
Diabetes Metab J. 2015 Aug;39(4):273-82
pubmed: 26301188
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Nov 29;5(11):e179
pubmed: 29187344
Methods. 2018 Dec 1;151:34-40
pubmed: 29890285
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Mar;11(3):607-619
pubmed: 31983028
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2017 Jan 08;15:104-116
pubmed: 28138367
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 30;20(5):e10775
pubmed: 29848472
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S111-S124
pubmed: 33298420
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 15;9(2):e23477
pubmed: 33587045
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;162:108084
pubmed: 32061819
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Jul 25;11:97
pubmed: 25059981
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;160:108009
pubmed: 31926844