Front-line staff perspectives on a caring culture in Chinese hospitals: Validation of a Chinese version of the Culture of Care Barometer.
China
Culture of Care Barometer
caring culture
measurement
validation
Journal
Journal of nursing management
ISSN: 1365-2834
Titre abrégé: J Nurs Manag
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9306050
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
revised:
25
04
2022
received:
14
03
2022
accepted:
03
05
2022
pubmed:
5
5
2022
medline:
4
10
2022
entrez:
4
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study is to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Culture of Care Barometer in health care organizations. There is a lack of tools to gauge the caring culture in Chinese hospitals. The Culture of Care Barometer is a psychometrically sound measure for caring culture developed in Western settings. This study was guided by Sousa and Rojjanasrira's methodological approach. A total of 2365 staff were recruited from two tertiary hospitals. The Barometer was administered with the Hospital Culture Evaluation Index and Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. The content validity index was calculated as 0.99. The goodness-of-fit indices, apart from the model chi-square, which was statistically significant, all exceeded established thresholds for adequate fit. The internal consistency was very satisfactory. Pearson's correlation indicated that the tool has good concurrent and convergent validity. The Barometer is a reliable and valid instrument to assess front-line staff perspectives on a caring culture in Chinese hospitals. Nursing managers can use the Barometer to gauge the caring culture in China. Tailored interventions can be designed to address specific domains, and additional support can be provided to more vulnerable departments or staff groups.
Sections du résumé
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Culture of Care Barometer in health care organizations.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is a lack of tools to gauge the caring culture in Chinese hospitals. The Culture of Care Barometer is a psychometrically sound measure for caring culture developed in Western settings.
METHODS
METHODS
This study was guided by Sousa and Rojjanasrira's methodological approach. A total of 2365 staff were recruited from two tertiary hospitals. The Barometer was administered with the Hospital Culture Evaluation Index and Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The content validity index was calculated as 0.99. The goodness-of-fit indices, apart from the model chi-square, which was statistically significant, all exceeded established thresholds for adequate fit. The internal consistency was very satisfactory. Pearson's correlation indicated that the tool has good concurrent and convergent validity.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The Barometer is a reliable and valid instrument to assess front-line staff perspectives on a caring culture in Chinese hospitals.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT
CONCLUSIONS
Nursing managers can use the Barometer to gauge the caring culture in China. Tailored interventions can be designed to address specific domains, and additional support can be provided to more vulnerable departments or staff groups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35506434
doi: 10.1111/jonm.13657
pmc: PMC9796908
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2093-2102Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Nursing Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;17(2):268-74
pubmed: 20874835
Nurs Outlook. 2019 Sep - Oct;67(5):558-566
pubmed: 31202444
J Soc Psychol. 2002 Aug;142(4):461-80
pubmed: 12153123
BMJ Open. 2013 Sep 23;3(9):e003416
pubmed: 24065697
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459-67
pubmed: 17654487
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
J Interprof Care. 2020 May-Jun;34(3):324-331
pubmed: 31390903
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 18;7(8):e016677
pubmed: 28821526
J Pak Med Assoc. 2012 Feb;62(2):142-7
pubmed: 22755376
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Dec 1;69(12):1245-1251
pubmed: 30301449
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e203976
pubmed: 32202646
Front Public Health. 2020 Oct 22;8:579866
pubmed: 33194981
Qual Health Res. 2013 Sep;23(9):1179-87
pubmed: 23264536
World J Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 19;11(7):337-346
pubmed: 34327126
Psychol Methods. 2001 Sep;6(3):258-69
pubmed: 11570231
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Jun;74(6):1332-1341
pubmed: 29350781
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 1;9(3):e023823
pubmed: 30826758
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Sep;30(6):2093-2102
pubmed: 35506434
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0207394
pubmed: 30540768
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Apr;73(4):871-882
pubmed: 27732746
Nurs Inq. 2021 Jan;28(1):e12380
pubmed: 32955787
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Aug;34(2):148-59
pubmed: 17509816
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019 Feb 08;15:259-267
pubmed: 30799925