Qualitative study to characterize patient experience and relevance of patient-reported outcome measures for patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma.

Content validity HRQoL Impact Metastatic PRO Qualitative interviews Symptoms Synovial sarcoma

Journal

Journal of patient-reported outcomes
ISSN: 2509-8020
Titre abrégé: J Patient Rep Outcomes
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101722688

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 May 2022
Historique:
received: 10 08 2021
accepted: 20 04 2022
entrez: 4 5 2022
pubmed: 5 5 2022
medline: 5 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The outlook for patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma (mSS) is poor. Better understanding of patient experience in this setting, beyond clinical measures, may guide improvements in management. Validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments specific to many types of cancer exist, but for rare cancers this is often not the case. This study aimed to characterize patient experiences of symptoms and impacts of mSS and evaluate the content validity and relevance of the novel European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Item Library 31 (EORTC IL31) Disease Symptoms PRO tool assessing synovial sarcoma symptoms. This tool comprises items from preexisting, validated cancer-specific PRO instruments from the EORTC Item Library. It was developed as an mSS-specific add-on to the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30), which evaluates general cancer and treatment-related symptoms and functioning. This was a non-interventional, qualitative interview study involving semi-structured, concept elicitation (CE) and cognitive debriefing (CD) telephone interviews in adults with mSS. CE explored symptoms and their impact on functioning and quality of life; CD assessed participant understanding and relevance of the PRO tools. Among the 8 participants, the most common disease-related symptoms reported during CE were fatigue and pain, while shortness of breath was one of the most bothersome. The greatest negative impacts of mSS occurred in domains of physical functioning and sleep. Key treatment priorities for patients were to improve disrupted sleep and ability to undertake strenuous activities. The interviews showed that, when used together, the EORTC IL31 and EORTC QLQ-C30 covered symptoms and impacts of most relevance and importance to patients with mSS, with no notable gaps and good conceptual coverage. This study therefore supports the content validity of 2 tools in mSS, advocating their use in clinical trials to assess treatment impact on PRO measures of importance to these patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The outlook for patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma (mSS) is poor. Better understanding of patient experience in this setting, beyond clinical measures, may guide improvements in management. Validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments specific to many types of cancer exist, but for rare cancers this is often not the case.
METHODS METHODS
This study aimed to characterize patient experiences of symptoms and impacts of mSS and evaluate the content validity and relevance of the novel European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Item Library 31 (EORTC IL31) Disease Symptoms PRO tool assessing synovial sarcoma symptoms. This tool comprises items from preexisting, validated cancer-specific PRO instruments from the EORTC Item Library. It was developed as an mSS-specific add-on to the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30), which evaluates general cancer and treatment-related symptoms and functioning. This was a non-interventional, qualitative interview study involving semi-structured, concept elicitation (CE) and cognitive debriefing (CD) telephone interviews in adults with mSS. CE explored symptoms and their impact on functioning and quality of life; CD assessed participant understanding and relevance of the PRO tools.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among the 8 participants, the most common disease-related symptoms reported during CE were fatigue and pain, while shortness of breath was one of the most bothersome. The greatest negative impacts of mSS occurred in domains of physical functioning and sleep. Key treatment priorities for patients were to improve disrupted sleep and ability to undertake strenuous activities.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The interviews showed that, when used together, the EORTC IL31 and EORTC QLQ-C30 covered symptoms and impacts of most relevance and importance to patients with mSS, with no notable gaps and good conceptual coverage. This study therefore supports the content validity of 2 tools in mSS, advocating their use in clinical trials to assess treatment impact on PRO measures of importance to these patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35507231
doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00450-1
pii: 10.1186/s41687-022-00450-1
pmc: PMC9068846
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

43

Subventions

Organisme : GSK
ID : 209386

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Aytekin MN, Ozturk R, Amer K, Yapar A (2020) Epidemiology, incidence, and survival of synovial sarcoma subtypes: SEER database analysis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 28(2):2309499020936009. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499020936009
doi: 10.1177/2309499020936009
National Cancer Institute (2020) Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/soft.html . Accessed November 2020
Stacchiotti S, Van Tine BA (2018) synovial sarcoma: current concepts and future perspectives. J Clin Oncol 36(2):180–187. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.1941
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.1941 pubmed: 29220290
National Cancer Institute (2019) Synovial sarcoma. https://www.cancer.gov/pediatric-adult-rare-tumor/rare-tumors/rare-soft-tissue-tumors/synovial-sarcoma . Accessed October 2020
Krieg AH, Hefti F, Speth BM, Jundt G, Guillou L, Exner UG et al (2011) Synovial sarcomas usually metastasize after >5 years: a multicenter retrospective analysis with minimum follow-up of 10 years for survivors. Ann Oncol 22(2):458–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq394
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq394 pubmed: 20716627
Kogushi K, LoPresti M, Ikeda S (2020) Systematic literature review of clinical outcomes in adults with metastatic or advanced synovial sarcoma. Future Oncol. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2020-0575
doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-0575 pubmed: 32851862
Pender A, Davis EJ, Chauhan D, Messiou C, Al-Muderis O, Thway K et al (2018) Poor treatment outcomes with palliative gemcitabine and docetaxel chemotherapy in advanced and metastatic synovial sarcoma. Med Oncol 35(10):131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-018-1193-5
doi: 10.1007/s12032-018-1193-5 pubmed: 30128716 pmcid: 6105245
Reichardt P, Leahy M, Garcia Del Muro X, Ferrari S, Martin J, Gelderblom H et al (2012) Quality of life and utility in patients with metastatic soft tissue and bone sarcoma: the sarcoma treatment and burden of illness in North America and Europe (SABINE) study. Sarcoma. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/740279
doi: 10.1155/2012/740279 pubmed: 22550425 pmcid: 3329673
Poveda A, Lopez-Pousa A, Martin J, Del Muro JG, Bernabe R, Casado A et al (2005) Phase II clinical trial with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (CAELYX(R)/Doxil(R)) and QUALITY OF LIFE EVALUATION (EORTC QLQ-C30) in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a study of the Spanish group for research in sarcomas (GEIS). Sarcoma 9(3–4):127–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13577140500287024
doi: 10.1080/13577140500287024 pubmed: 18521419 pmcid: 2395634
Winnette R, Hess LM, Nicol SJ, Tai DF, Copley-Merriman C (2017) The patient experience with soft tissue sarcoma: a systematic review of the literature. Patient 10(2):153–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-016-0200-1
doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0200-1 pubmed: 27744499
Gough N, Koffman J, Ross JR, Riley J, Judson I (2017) Symptom burden in advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. J Pain Symptom Manage 53(3):588–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.10.357
doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.10.357 pubmed: 28042077
van der Graaf WT, Blay JY, Chawla SP, Kim DW, Bui-Nguyen B, Casali PG et al (2012) Pazopanib for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (PALETTE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 379(9829):1879–1886. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60651-5
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60651-5 pubmed: 22595799
Skalicky AM, Ghate SR, Perez JR, Rentz AM (2017) Results of a qualitative study to develop a patient reported outcome measure for patients with 4 subtypes of soft tissue sarcoma. Sarcoma. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6868030
doi: 10.1155/2017/6868030 pubmed: 28588396 pmcid: 5446879
Gundle KR, Cizik AM, Jones RL, Davidson DJ (2015) Quality of life measures in soft tissue sarcoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 15(1):95–100. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737140.2015.972947
doi: 10.1586/14737140.2015.972947 pubmed: 25377073
Kulis D, Bottomley A, Whittaker C, van de Poll-Franse L, Darlington A, Holzner B et al (2017) The use of the EORTC item library to supplement EORTC quality of life instruments. Value Health 20(9):A775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.2236
doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.2236
Food and Drug Administration (2019) Public Workshop on Patient-Focused Drug Development: Guidance 4 – Incorporating Clinical Outcome Assessments into Endpoints for Regulatory Decision Making. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-approval-process-drugs/public-workshop-patient-focused-drug-development-guidance-4-incorporating-clinical-outcome
Park JH, Rivière I, Gonen M, Wang X, Sénéchal B, Curran KJ et al (2018) Long-term follow-up of CD19 CAR therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 378(5):449–459. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1709919
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709919 pubmed: 29385376 pmcid: 6637939
Younger E, Jones RL, Desar IME, Peckitt C, van der Graaf WTA, Husson O (2020) Health-related quality Of Life In patients with advanced Soft TIssue sarcomas treated with Chemotherapy (The HOLISTIC study): protocol for an international observational cohort study. BMJ Open 10(6):e035171. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035171
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035171 pubmed: 32487574 pmcid: 7265010
Coens C, van der Graaf WT, Blay JY, Chawla SP, Judson I, Sanfilippo R et al (2015) Health-related quality-of-life results from PALETTE: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial of pazopanib versus placebo in patients with soft tissue sarcoma whose disease has progressed during or after prior chemotherapy—a European Organization for research and treatment of cancer soft tissue and bone sarcoma group global network study (EORTC 62072). Cancer 121(17):2933–2941. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29426
doi: 10.1002/cncr.29426 pubmed: 26033286

Auteurs

Laurie Eliason (L)

Value Evidence & Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA.

Laura Grant (L)

Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, SK10 5JB, UK.

Anya Francis (A)

Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, SK10 5JB, UK.

Anna Cardellino (A)

Value Evidence & Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA.

Ken Culver (K)

Value Evidence & Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA.

Sant P Chawla (SP)

Sarcoma Oncology Center, Santa Monica, CA, 90403, USA.

Rob Arbuckle (R)

Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, SK10 5JB, UK.

Shibani Pokras (S)

Value Evidence & Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA. shibani.x.pokras@gsk.com.

Classifications MeSH