Cancer patients' needs assessment in primary care: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT), economic evaluation and normalisation process theory evaluation of the needs assessment tool cancer (CANAssess).


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 05 2022
Historique:
entrez: 4 5 2022
pubmed: 5 5 2022
medline: 7 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Unmet needs in patients with cancer and their carers are common but poorly identified and addressed. The Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer (NAT-C) is a structured consultation guide to identify and triage patient and carer unmet needs. The NAT-C is validated, but its effectiveness in reducing unmet patient and carer needs in primary care is unknown. Cluster randomised controlled trial with internal pilot and embedded process evaluation to test the clinical and cost effectiveness of the NAT-C in primary care for people with active cancer in reducing unmet patient and carer need, compared with usual care. We will recruit 1080 patients with active cancer (and carers if relevant) from 54 general practices in England.Participating practices will be randomised 1:1 to either deliver an NAT-guided clinical consultation plus usual care or to usual care alone. Consenting participants with active cancer and their carers (if nominated) will be asked to complete study questionnaires at baseline, 1 and 3 months for all, 6 months except for those recruited outside of the last 3 months of recruitment, and attend an NAT-C appointment if allocated to an intervention practice. An internal pilot will assess: site and participant recruitment, intervention uptake and follow-up rates. The primary outcome, the proportion of patients with an unmet need on the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form 34 at 3 months postregistration, will be analysed using a multilevel logistic regression. Mixed-methods process evaluation informed by Normalisation Process Theory will use quantitative survey and interview data from clinicians and key stakeholders in cancer care to develop an implementation strategy for nationwide rollout of the NAT-C if the intervention is cost-effective. Ethical approval from London-Surrey REC (20/LO/0312). Results will be peer-reviewed, published and made available to research participants. ISRCTN15497400.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35508352
pii: bmjopen-2021-051394
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051394
pmc: PMC9073401
doi:

Banques de données

ISRCTN
['ISRCTN15497400']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Protocol Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e051394

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):535-42
pubmed: 19836205
Support Care Cancer. 2006 May;14(5):444-53
pubmed: 16402231
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jul 26;6:35
pubmed: 16872487
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Sep;189:114-128
pubmed: 28797940
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Oct;56(4):602-612
pubmed: 30009964
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Apr;61(585):173-82
pubmed: 21439175
Qual Life Res. 2014 Aug;23(6):1743-52
pubmed: 24381112
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 May 17;19(1):106
pubmed: 31101078
Ann Oncol. 2000 Jan;11(1):31-7
pubmed: 10690384
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr 10;30(11):1160-77
pubmed: 22412146
BMC Med. 2013 Apr 24;11:111
pubmed: 23618406
Clin Trials. 2005;2(2):99-107
pubmed: 16279131
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Mar;43(3):569-81
pubmed: 22209224
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Oct;26(4):922-53
pubmed: 14527761
Palliat Med. 2006 Mar;20(2):59-61
pubmed: 16613400
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 28;16(1):e0245647
pubmed: 33507949
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Feb 26;2:11
pubmed: 14987334
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Aug;15(4):602-6
pubmed: 19522727
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
BMJ Open. 2016 May 13;6(5):e010276
pubmed: 27178970
Eur J Cancer. 2006 Jan;42(1):55-64
pubmed: 16162404
Value Health. 2008 Sep-Oct;11(5):886-97
pubmed: 18489513
BMC Palliat Care. 2005 Nov 12;4:7
pubmed: 16283937
Health Econ. 2004 May;13(5):461-75
pubmed: 15127426
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004 Jan-Feb;19(1):68-75
pubmed: 14994784
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Dec 28;14:201
pubmed: 24373224
Cancer. 2000 Feb 15;88(4):900-11
pubmed: 10679661

Auteurs

Joseph Clark (J)

Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, University of Hull, Hull, UK joseph.clark@hyms.ac.uk.

Bethan Copsey (B)

Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds, UK.

Alexandra Wright-Hughes (A)

Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Emma McNaught (E)

Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Petra Bijsterveld (P)

Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Terry McCormack (T)

Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.

Robbie Foy (R)

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Scott Wilkes (S)

School of Pharmacy, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.

Jon Mark Dickson (JM)

Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

David Meads (D)

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Amanda Farrin (A)

Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Miriam Johnson (M)

Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, University of Hull, Hull, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH