Risk Management Plans: reassessment of safety concerns based on Good Pharmacovigilance Practices Module V (Revision 2)-a company experience.

Algorithm Good Pharmacovigilance Practice Module V Risk Management Plan Safety concerns

Journal

Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences
ISSN: 2055-0294
Titre abrégé: J Pharm Health Care Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672177

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 May 2022
Historique:
received: 16 11 2021
accepted: 06 04 2022
entrez: 5 5 2022
pubmed: 6 5 2022
medline: 6 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In the European Union (EU), a Risk Management Plan (RMP) is submitted as part of the dossier for initial marketing authorization of a medicinal product or with an application involving a significant change to an existing marketing authorization. A comprehensive revision of the EU Guideline on Good Pharmacovigilance Practices (GVP) Module V-Risk Management Systems (Revision [Rev] 2), adopted in March 2017, provides a framework for developing more focused, actionable, and risk-proportionate RMPs. This paper describes the Janssen experience with the interpretation and application of GVP Module V (Rev 2) regarding the evaluation of safety concerns in an RMP. Janssen convened a cross-functional working group to promote consistent interpretation of the GVP Module V (Rev 2) guidance across therapeutic areas. The group created 3 algorithms to support implementation of the guidance related to removal or reclassification of safety concerns by product-specific RMP teams. Following implementation of the GVP Module V (Rev 2) guidance, the algorithm-driven process led to a substantial decrease in the number of safety concerns for most products. With few exceptions, EU health authorities agreed with the proposed safety concern removals or reclassifications, resulting in RMPs that were focused on only those safety concerns that required further characterization or specific risk minimization. The algorithm-driven process allows for consistent interpretation and application of the GVP Module V (Rev 2) guidance, which enables product teams to develop an actionable RMP using a thoughtful, evaluative, science-based approach that considers all available evidence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35509028
doi: 10.1186/s40780-022-00244-z
pii: 10.1186/s40780-022-00244-z
pmc: PMC9069847
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

14

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Drug Saf. 2017 Oct;40(10):855-869
pubmed: 28735357

Auteurs

Suzan Esslinger (S)

Medical Affairs, Cilag GmbH International, Gubelstrasse 34, 6300, Zug, Switzerland. sesslin1@its.jnj.com.

Linda Quinn (L)

Global Medical Safety, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 850 Ridgeview Drive, Horsham, PA, 19044, USA.

Sami Sampat (S)

Global Medical Safety, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 850 Ridgeview Drive, Horsham, PA, 19044, USA.

Marijo Otero-Lobato (M)

Medical Affairs, Janssen Biologics BV, Einsteinweg 101, 2333 CB, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Wim Noël (W)

EMEA Medical Affairs, Janssen Cilag NV, Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340, Beerse, Belgium.

Anja Geldhof (A)

Medical Affairs, Janssen Biologics BV, Einsteinweg 101, 2333 CB, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Nicole Herijgers (N)

EMEA Regulatory Affairs, Janssen Biologics BV, Archimedesweg 29, 2333 CM, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Sarah-Jane Reeder (SJ)

Global Medical Safety, Janssen-Cilag Ltd., 50-100 Holmers Farm Way, High Wycombe, HP12 4DP, Buckinghamshire, UK.

Classifications MeSH