Nursing students' perception of gender-defined roles in nursing: a qualitative descriptive study.
Drawing method
Education
Equality
Male nurses
Sexism
Stereotypes
Journal
BMC nursing
ISSN: 1472-6955
Titre abrégé: BMC Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088683
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 May 2022
04 May 2022
Historique:
received:
23
11
2021
accepted:
18
04
2022
entrez:
5
5
2022
pubmed:
6
5
2022
medline:
6
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Gender stereotypes influence both women and men who work as nurses as well as individuals considering nursing as a profession. The aim of this study was to explore male and female nursing students' experiences and perspectives regarding gender-defined roles as well as how they view their future professional roles. The study used a descriptive qualitative design. A convenience sample included 72 full-time second- and third-year undergraduate nursing students. Data were collected in 2017 using a self-administered qualitative questionnaire consisting of 11 essay-type questions. As an additional data collection method, a drawing method was applied. The data were analysed by content analysis separately for the male and female perspectives. Altogether, eight themes emerged, with half explaining the male and the other half the female students' perspectives. Students choose nursing for altruistic, opportunistic and organisational reasons. Among the female students, another reason "family and social incentives" was also identified. Female students' vision of their future professional role included altruism and positive representations of 'being a nurse', whereas the male students' vision included management and leadership, and technical aspects of nursing. Both male and female nursing students face the limits of their own gender roles, yet they are prepared to challenge these gender-based perceptions. Tackling stereotypes and raising public awareness, using gender-inclusive language and strategies for recruitment, ensuring gender diversity in nursing teams and revising the nursing curriculum where appropriate, are just some of the implications that arise to help overcome gender differences.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Gender stereotypes influence both women and men who work as nurses as well as individuals considering nursing as a profession. The aim of this study was to explore male and female nursing students' experiences and perspectives regarding gender-defined roles as well as how they view their future professional roles.
METHODS
METHODS
The study used a descriptive qualitative design. A convenience sample included 72 full-time second- and third-year undergraduate nursing students. Data were collected in 2017 using a self-administered qualitative questionnaire consisting of 11 essay-type questions. As an additional data collection method, a drawing method was applied. The data were analysed by content analysis separately for the male and female perspectives.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Altogether, eight themes emerged, with half explaining the male and the other half the female students' perspectives. Students choose nursing for altruistic, opportunistic and organisational reasons. Among the female students, another reason "family and social incentives" was also identified. Female students' vision of their future professional role included altruism and positive representations of 'being a nurse', whereas the male students' vision included management and leadership, and technical aspects of nursing.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Both male and female nursing students face the limits of their own gender roles, yet they are prepared to challenge these gender-based perceptions. Tackling stereotypes and raising public awareness, using gender-inclusive language and strategies for recruitment, ensuring gender diversity in nursing teams and revising the nursing curriculum where appropriate, are just some of the implications that arise to help overcome gender differences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35509039
doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00876-4
pii: 10.1186/s12912-022-00876-4
pmc: PMC9069743
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
104Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 05;18(5):
pubmed: 33807772
Nurs Forum. 2019 Oct;54(4):593-600
pubmed: 31463944
Int Nurs Rev. 2019 Dec;66(4):563-570
pubmed: 31373386
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Nov;58:72-77
pubmed: 28917155
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Aug;29(15-16):3097-3107
pubmed: 32129522
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Jan;89:18-23
pubmed: 30316956
Nurs Outlook. 2018 Jan - Feb;66(1):84-93.e3
pubmed: 28888672
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Nov;99:103388
pubmed: 31493758
J Transcult Nurs. 2018 May;29(3):285-291
pubmed: 28826326
Res Nurs Health. 2017 Feb;40(1):23-42
pubmed: 27686751
Contemp Nurse. 2015;51(1):5-15
pubmed: 26073696