Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells prevent type 1 diabetes induced by immune checkpoint blockade.
Immune checkpoint inhibitor
Mesenchymal stem cells
NOD mouse
Journal
Diabetologia
ISSN: 1432-0428
Titre abrégé: Diabetologia
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0006777
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
received:
24
09
2021
accepted:
08
02
2022
pubmed:
6
5
2022
medline:
10
6
2022
entrez:
5
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Immunomodulators blocking cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have improved the treatment of a broad spectrum of cancers. These immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) reactivate the immune system against tumour cells but can also trigger autoimmune side effects, including type 1 diabetes. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy is the most prevalent cell therapy, with tissue-regenerating, anti-fibrosis and immunomodulatory functions provided by the secretome of the cells. Here, we examined whether systemic MSC treatment could prevent the development of type 1 diabetes in a NOD mouse model. The purified PD-L1 monoclonal antibody was administered to induce diabetes in male NOD mice which normally do not develop diabetes. Human adipose-derived MSCs were administered by tail vein injections. T cells, macrophages and monocyte-derived macrophages expressing C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9 (CXCL9) in pancreatic sections of NOD mice and a cancer patient who developed diabetes following the ICI treatments were analysed by immunofluorescence. Tissue localisation of the injected MSCs, plasma exosome levels and plasma cytokine profiles were also investigated. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade induced diabetes in 16 of 25 (64%) NOD mice which received anti-PD-L1 mAb without hMSCs [MSC(-)], whereas MSC administration decreased the incidence to four of 21 (19%) NOD mice which received anti-PD-L1 mAb and hMSCs [MSC(+)]. The PD-1/PD-L1 blockade significantly increased the area of CD3-positive T cells (6.2-fold) and macrophage-2 (Mac-2) antigen (2.5-fold)- and CXCL9 (40.3-fold)-positive macrophages in the islets. MSCs significantly reduced T cell (45%) and CXCL9-positive macrophage (67%) accumulation in the islets and the occurrence of diabetes. The insulin content (1.9-fold) and islet beta cell area (2.7-fold) were also improved by MSCs. T cells and CXCL9-positive macrophages infiltrated into the intricate gaps between the beta cells in the islets by PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Such immune cell infiltration was largely prevented by MSCs. The most striking difference was observed in the CXCL9-positive macrophages, which normally did not reside in the beta cell region in the islets but abundantly accumulated in this area after PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and were prevented by MSCs. The CXCL9-positive macrophages were also observed in the islets of a cancer patient who developed diabetes following the administration of ICIs but few CXCL9-positive macrophages were observed in a control patient. Mechanistically, the injected MSCs accumulated in the lung but not in the pancreas and strongly increased plasma exosome levels and changed plasma cytokine profiles. Our results suggest that MSCs can prevent the incidence of diabetes associated with immune checkpoint cancer therapy and may be worth further consideration for new adjuvant cell therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35511238
doi: 10.1007/s00125-022-05708-3
pii: 10.1007/s00125-022-05708-3
pmc: PMC9174328
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
B7-H1 Antigen
0
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
0
Banques de données
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.xwdbrv1fh']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1185-1197Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 16;102(33):11823-8
pubmed: 16087865
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Feb 05;8:43
pubmed: 32117924
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jan;142:18-28
pubmed: 33212418
Cell Transplant. 2014;23(9):1075-85
pubmed: 23561959
Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):832-6
pubmed: 12610045
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2017 Dec;24(12):T331-T347
pubmed: 29025857
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018 Aug;14(8):493-507
pubmed: 29895977
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jul;42(7):e116-e118
pubmed: 31076419
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jan 15;26(2):487-504
pubmed: 31636098
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 8;117(49):31319-31330
pubmed: 33229539
J Immunol. 2008 Oct 1;181(7):4832-9
pubmed: 18802087
Sci Rep. 2018 May 16;8(1):7716
pubmed: 29769543
Diabetes. 2015 Feb;64(2):587-92
pubmed: 25204974
Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Jan;3(1):36-45; quiz 2p following 69
pubmed: 17179928
J Extracell Vesicles. 2015 Feb 09;4:26238
pubmed: 25669322
J Biochem. 2021 Mar 5;169(2):173-179
pubmed: 32979268
Int Immunol. 1996 May;8(5):765-72
pubmed: 8671665
Eur J Immunol. 2003 Oct;33(10):2773-82
pubmed: 14515261
Circ Res. 2010 Mar 19;106(5):971-80
pubmed: 20110532
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Feb 13;7(1):e000591
pubmed: 30899528
J Exp Med. 2006 Apr 17;203(4):883-95
pubmed: 16606670
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 30;11(1):3801
pubmed: 32732879
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 1;115(18):4749-4754
pubmed: 29654146
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200423
pubmed: 32150268
Diabetol Int. 2018 Jul 03;10(1):58-66
pubmed: 30800564
J Exp Med. 2003 Jul 7;198(1):63-9
pubmed: 12847137
J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Feb;9(2):
pubmed: 33637602
Diabetologia. 2009 Jul;52(7):1391-9
pubmed: 19421731
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Nov;8(2):
pubmed: 33154150
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Nov 1;104(11):5499-5506
pubmed: 31265074
Sci Rep. 2018 May 29;8(1):8295
pubmed: 29844327
Diabetes. 2018 Aug;67(8):1471-1480
pubmed: 29937434
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018 Nov 14;9(1):312
pubmed: 30428931
Mol Ther. 2020 Oct 7;28(10):2203-2219
pubmed: 32652045
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Jun;7(6):421-423
pubmed: 30885563
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Nov;101(11):4431-4439
pubmed: 27571185
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Feb 01;4(2):173-182
pubmed: 28973656
Front Immunol. 2019 Jun 04;10:1191
pubmed: 31214172