The diagnostic utility of endocytoscopy for the detection of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.


Journal

Minerva gastroenterology
ISSN: 2724-5365
Titre abrégé: Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino)
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101777280

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 05 2022
Historique:
entrez: 5 5 2022
pubmed: 6 5 2022
medline: 6 5 2022
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Endocytoscopy (ECS) is an evolving technology that utilizes ultra-high power magnification for real time cellular imaging without the need for physical biopsy. Its application for gastric cancer (GC) detection is not well evaluated at the current time, but there is potential that ECS can make a real time histopathological diagnosis to differentiate neoplastic from benign lesions. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic utility of ECS for GC detection. Literature searches through multiple databases were performed for studies using ECS for GC detection until November 2021. Measured outcomes included the pooled sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Quality assessment of diagnostic studies tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Four studies (n=245) were included. The pooled sensitivity was 83.5% (95% CI: 75% - 89%, I2: 0) and specificity was 91.7% (95% CI: 79% - 97%, I2: 58%). The pooled accuracy was 89.2% (95% CI: 83% - 94%, I2: 38%). There was a low risk of bias. ECS is an accurate diagnostic modality and has the potential to serve as a complimentary tool in screening for GC. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings before its further widespread use.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND/AIMS
Endocytoscopy (ECS) is an evolving technology that utilizes ultra-high power magnification for real time cellular imaging without the need for physical biopsy. Its application for gastric cancer (GC) detection is not well evaluated at the current time, but there is potential that ECS can make a real time histopathological diagnosis to differentiate neoplastic from benign lesions. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic utility of ECS for GC detection.
METHODS
Literature searches through multiple databases were performed for studies using ECS for GC detection until November 2021. Measured outcomes included the pooled sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Quality assessment of diagnostic studies tool was used to assess the risk of bias.
RESULTS
Four studies (n=245) were included. The pooled sensitivity was 83.5% (95% CI: 75% - 89%, I2: 0) and specificity was 91.7% (95% CI: 79% - 97%, I2: 58%). The pooled accuracy was 89.2% (95% CI: 83% - 94%, I2: 38%). There was a low risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS
ECS is an accurate diagnostic modality and has the potential to serve as a complimentary tool in screening for GC. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings before its further widespread use.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35511654
pii: S2724-5985.22.03172-2
doi: 10.23736/S2724-5985.22.03172-2
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Andrew Canakis (A)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA - acanakis@som.umaryland.edu.

Shivanand Bomman (S)

Center for Digestive Health, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA, USA.

Benjamin Twery (B)

University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Nevin Varghese (N)

University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Byung Ji (B)

Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Justin Canakis (J)

Department of Medicine, George Washington University, Washington DC, WA, USA.

Eric M Goldberg (EM)

Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Classifications MeSH