Perception thresholds and qualitative perceptions for electrocutaneous stimulation.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 05 2022
05 05 2022
Historique:
received:
18
06
2021
accepted:
08
04
2022
entrez:
5
5
2022
pubmed:
6
5
2022
medline:
10
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Our long-term goal is the development of a wearable warning system that uses electrocutaneous stimulation. To find appropriate stimulation parameters and electrode configurations, we investigate perception amplitude thresholds and qualitative perceptions of electrocutaneous stimulation for varying pulse widths, electrode sizes, and electrode positions. The upper right arm was stimulated in 81 healthy volunteers with biphasic rectangular current pulses varying between 20 and [Formula: see text]. We determined perception, attention, and intolerance thresholds and the corresponding qualitative perceptions for 8 electrode pairs distributed around the upper arm. For a pulse width of [Formula: see text], we find median values of 3.5, 6.9, and 13.8 mA for perception, attention, and intolerance thresholds, respectively. All thresholds decrease with increasing pulse width. Lateral electrode positions have higher intolerance thresholds than medial electrode positions, but perception and attention threshold are not significantly different across electrode positions. Electrode size between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] has no significant influence on the thresholds. Knocking is the prevailing perception for perception and attention thresholds while mostly muscle twitching, pinching, and stinging are reported at the intolerance threshold. Biphasic stimulation pulse widths between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are suitable for electric warning wearables. Within the given practical limits at the upper arm, electrode size, inter-electrode distance, and electrode position are flexible parameters of electric warning wearables. Our investigations provide the basis for electric warning wearables.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35513410
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10708-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-10708-9
pmc: PMC9072403
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7335Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Ann Neurol. 2008 Apr;63(4):507-12
pubmed: 18300313
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jul;232(7):2179-85
pubmed: 24668131
Artif Organs. 2015 Oct;39(10):868-75
pubmed: 26471138
J Neural Eng. 2011 Aug;8(4):046032
pubmed: 21753229
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017 Mar;25(3):183-195
pubmed: 27071179
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Mar;79(3):273-8
pubmed: 9523778
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1992 Jul;39(7):701-15
pubmed: 1516937
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Feb;232(2):597-607
pubmed: 24337229
J Spinal Cord Med. 2010;33(3):249-55
pubmed: 20737798
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(2):297-308
pubmed: 22773530
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018 Mar;24(1):149-159
pubmed: 28869404
Muscle Nerve. 2003 Aug;28(2):239-41
pubmed: 12872331
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011 Feb 09;8:9
pubmed: 21306616
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Jan;25(1):64-73
pubmed: 12565190
Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):148-54
pubmed: 15621375
Percept Psychophys. 1978 Mar;23(3):251-7
pubmed: 662576
Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Mar;125(3):602-7
pubmed: 24070673
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2013 Sep;51(9):999-1009
pubmed: 23625183
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1982 Apr;29(4):300-8
pubmed: 7068167
Phys Ther. 1994 Oct;74(10):951-62
pubmed: 8090846
Percept Psychophys. 1981 Dec;30(6):579-86
pubmed: 7335455
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1985 Jul;32(7):461-9
pubmed: 4018827