Unconditional cash transfers and maternal substance use: findings from a randomized control trial of low-income mothers with infants in the U.S.


Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 05 2022
Historique:
received: 30 09 2021
accepted: 09 03 2022
entrez: 5 5 2022
pubmed: 6 5 2022
medline: 10 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Policy debates over anti-poverty programs are often marked by pernicious stereotypes suggesting that direct cash transfers to people residing in poverty encourage health-risking behaviors such as smoking, drinking, and other substance use. Causal evidence on this issue is limited in the U.S. Given the prominent role of child allowances and other forms of cash assistance in the 2021 American Rescue Plan and proposed Build Back Better legislation, evidence on the extent to which a monthly unconditional cash gift changes substance use patterns among low-income mothers with infants warrants attention, particularly in the context of economic supports that can help improve early environments of children. We employ a multi-site, parallel-group, randomized control trial in which 1,000 low-income mothers in the U.S. with newborns were recruited from hospitals shortly after the infant's birth and randomly assigned to receive either a substantial ($333) or a nominal ($20) monthly cash gift during the early years of the infant's life. We estimate the effect of the unconditional cash transfer on self-report measures of maternal substance use (i.e., alcohol, cigarette, or opioid use) and household expenditures on alcohol and cigarettes after one year of cash gifts. The cash gift difference of $313 per month had small and statistically nonsignificant impacts on group differences in maternal reports of substance use and household expenditures on alcohol or cigarettes. Effect sizes ranged between - 0.067 standard deviations and + 0.072 standard deviations. The estimated share of the $313 group difference spent on alcohol and tobacco was less than 1%. Our randomized control trial of monthly cash gifts to mothers with newborn infants finds that a cash gift difference of $313 per month did not significantly change maternal use of alcohol, cigarettes, or opioids or household expenditures on alcohol or cigarettes. Although the structure of our cash gifts differs somewhat from that of a government-provided child allowance, our null effect findings suggest that unconditional cash transfers aimed at families living in poverty are unlikely to induce large changes in substance use and expenditures by recipients. Registered on Clinical Trials.gov NCT03593356 in July of 2018.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Policy debates over anti-poverty programs are often marked by pernicious stereotypes suggesting that direct cash transfers to people residing in poverty encourage health-risking behaviors such as smoking, drinking, and other substance use. Causal evidence on this issue is limited in the U.S. Given the prominent role of child allowances and other forms of cash assistance in the 2021 American Rescue Plan and proposed Build Back Better legislation, evidence on the extent to which a monthly unconditional cash gift changes substance use patterns among low-income mothers with infants warrants attention, particularly in the context of economic supports that can help improve early environments of children.
METHOD
We employ a multi-site, parallel-group, randomized control trial in which 1,000 low-income mothers in the U.S. with newborns were recruited from hospitals shortly after the infant's birth and randomly assigned to receive either a substantial ($333) or a nominal ($20) monthly cash gift during the early years of the infant's life. We estimate the effect of the unconditional cash transfer on self-report measures of maternal substance use (i.e., alcohol, cigarette, or opioid use) and household expenditures on alcohol and cigarettes after one year of cash gifts.
RESULTS
The cash gift difference of $313 per month had small and statistically nonsignificant impacts on group differences in maternal reports of substance use and household expenditures on alcohol or cigarettes. Effect sizes ranged between - 0.067 standard deviations and + 0.072 standard deviations. The estimated share of the $313 group difference spent on alcohol and tobacco was less than 1%.
CONCLUSIONS
Our randomized control trial of monthly cash gifts to mothers with newborn infants finds that a cash gift difference of $313 per month did not significantly change maternal use of alcohol, cigarettes, or opioids or household expenditures on alcohol or cigarettes. Although the structure of our cash gifts differs somewhat from that of a government-provided child allowance, our null effect findings suggest that unconditional cash transfers aimed at families living in poverty are unlikely to induce large changes in substance use and expenditures by recipients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Registered on Clinical Trials.gov NCT03593356 in July of 2018.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35513842
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12989-1
pii: 10.1186/s12889-022-12989-1
pmc: PMC9070980
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03593356']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

897

Subventions

Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD087384
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R25 MH067127
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

World Bank Res Obs. 2018 Aug;33(2):259-298
pubmed: 31693721
Econ Inq. 2012;50(1):153-70
pubmed: 22329051
Milbank Q. 2005;83(1):65-99
pubmed: 15787954
Health Econ Rev. 2013 Jul 24;3(1):17
pubmed: 23883547
Health Econ. 2013 Nov;22(11):1344-59
pubmed: 23239400
Subst Abuse. 2017 Mar 14;11:1178221817694038
pubmed: 28469425
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Dec;194:67-75
pubmed: 29073507
Pediatrics. 2016 Aug;138(2):
pubmed: 27432847
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Jan;20(1):41-47
pubmed: 26175273
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;43(6):1884-94
pubmed: 25172139
Womens Health Issues. 2002 Jan-Feb;12(1):23-31
pubmed: 11786289
Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Jan;11(1):12-24
pubmed: 19246437
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;276:113274
pubmed: 33740636
Pediatrics. 2021 Oct;148(4):
pubmed: 34475270
Dev Psychopathol. 2020 May;32(2):765-778
pubmed: 31274064
Addiction. 2003 Dec;98 Suppl 2:1-12
pubmed: 14984237
Prev Med. 2020 Oct;139:106223
pubmed: 32735990

Auteurs

Paul Y Yoo (PY)

School of Education, University of California, Irvine, 401 E. Peltason Drive, Suite 3200, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.

Greg J Duncan (GJ)

School of Education, University of California, Irvine, 401 E. Peltason Drive, Suite 3200, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. gduncan@uci.edu.

Katherine Magnuson (K)

Sandra Rosenbaum School of Social Work, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1350 University Ave, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.

Nathan A Fox (NA)

College of Education, University of Maryland, College Park, 3119 Benjamin Building, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.

Hirokazu Yoshikawa (H)

Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York University, 82 Washington Square E, New York, NY, 10003, USA.

Sarah Halpern-Meekin (S)

School of Human Ecology & La Follette School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1300 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706, USA.

Kimberly G Noble (KG)

Teachers College, Columbia University, 525 West 120th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH