'It's the ultimate observer role…you're feeling and seeing what's happening to you': students' experiences of peer simulation.

Health professions education Simulation-based education Standardised patients (Actors)

Journal

BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning
ISSN: 2056-6697
Titre abrégé: BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101684779

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 05 04 2020
revised: 08 09 2020
accepted: 15 10 2020
entrez: 6 5 2022
pubmed: 29 10 2020
medline: 29 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Simulation-based education (SBE) benefits learners, but multiple barriers limit curriculum integration. Peer simulation, where students are formally educated to portray patient roles in simulated interactions with their peers, might maintain the educational benefits of SBE, be cost-effective, and enable additional learning. Our research question was: 'What are the perspectives and experiences of physiotherapy students who participated in peer simulation?'. Second-year physiotherapy students (n=16) participated in a blended peer simulation programme that included preparation for patient role portrayal and simulated clinical interactions with peers. Using an interpretivist approach, students' experiences and perspectives were explored in two focus groups. Inductive thematic analysis was completed by two researchers. Three primary themes were identified that characterised the experiences and perspectives of physiotherapy students: peer simulation is a valuable learning experience, specific design features enable effective peer simulation, and portraying a patient provides unique insight. Peer simulation was unexpectedly realistic, revealed knowledge and skill deficits, and improved their clinical skills. Specific design features included consistent engagement, repetitive, individualised practice, multiple forms of feedback, and detailed role preparation. Being the patient in peer simulation gave students unique and valuable insight into patients' experiences of and feelings about health issues and healthcare interactions. Physiotherapy students acquire new insights during peer simulation that may enrich their capabilities for practice through understanding healthcare interactions from patients' perspectives. Physiotherapy students' learning in peer simulation appears to align with the powerful learning experiences of health professional students in other immersive simulation modalities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35515749
doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000633
pii: bmjstel-2020-000633
pmc: PMC8936562
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

329-337

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Adv Simul (Lond). 2017 Jun 27;2:10
pubmed: 29450011
Acad Med. 1999 Aug;74(8):932-7
pubmed: 10495736
JAMA. 2011 Sep 7;306(9):978-88
pubmed: 21900138
Ann Surg. 2013 Dec;258(6):958-63
pubmed: 23478533
Simul Healthc. 2014 Dec;9(6):339-49
pubmed: 25188485
Med Educ. 2019 Apr;53(4):369-379
pubmed: 30334299
Simul Healthc. 2015 Oct;10(5):308-19
pubmed: 26426561
Med Teach. 2006 May;28(3):225-9
pubmed: 16753719
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Acad Med. 2018 Aug;93(8):1257
pubmed: 29697429
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2010 Oct;19(4):481-7
pubmed: 20719026
Simul Healthc. 2012 Oct;7(5):308-20
pubmed: 23032751
Med Teach. 2013 Oct;35(10):e1511-30
pubmed: 23941678
BMC Med Educ. 2014 May 23;14:105
pubmed: 24885224
Patient. 2016 Feb;9(1):15-25
pubmed: 26002043
Med Teach. 2017 Nov;39(11):1159-1167
pubmed: 28845722
Med Educ. 2006 Aug;40(8):781-6
pubmed: 16869924
Med Teach. 2020 Mar;42(3):362
pubmed: 31230480
Simul Healthc. 2020 Feb;15(1):21-29
pubmed: 31743313
Simul Healthc. 2016 Aug;11(4):238-48
pubmed: 27465839
BMC Med Educ. 2010 Mar 31;10:27
pubmed: 20353612
Qual Health Res. 1999 Jan;9(1):26-44
pubmed: 10558357
Acad Med. 2011 Jun;86(6):706-11
pubmed: 21512370
Med Teach. 2011;33(12):e663-9
pubmed: 22225448
Nurse Educ. 2009 Jan-Feb;34(1):12-6
pubmed: 19104339
Med Teach. 2009 Jun;31(6):477-86
pubmed: 19811162
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 25;19(1):231
pubmed: 31238920
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Nov 29;14:253
pubmed: 25471306
Simul Healthc. 2018 Jun;13(3):181-187
pubmed: 29346226
Phys Ther. 2016 Sep;96(9):1342-53
pubmed: 26939603
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Feb 15;8:163-165
pubmed: 28243160
Med Educ. 2010 Apr;44(4):358-66
pubmed: 20444071
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Aug;84(2):261-4
pubmed: 20719464
Adv Simul (Lond). 2016 Jan 11;1:4
pubmed: 29449973

Auteurs

Shane A Pritchard (SA)

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.

Narelle Dalwood (N)

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.

Jennifer L Keating (JL)

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.

Debra Nestel (D)

Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.

Maxine Te (M)

School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia.

Felicity Blackstock (F)

School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia.

Classifications MeSH