Cultural considerations in debriefing: a systematic review of the literature.
communication
debriefing
faculty development
simulation faculty
systematic review
Journal
BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning
ISSN: 2056-6697
Titre abrégé: BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101684779
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
24
12
2020
accepted:
10
04
2021
entrez:
6
5
2022
pubmed:
7
5
2022
medline:
7
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Conversations are influenced by cultural perceptions, beliefs and values. Debriefing is a learning conversation. Without cross-cultural engagement or culturally relevant teaching, learning may be compromised and may result in an outcome opposite of that intended. This systematic review explores cultural considerations in healthcare simulation debriefing. We sought to explore findings that could help debriefers create culturally responsive and inclusive debriefings. Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed articles in any language and focused on healthcare simulation debriefing and global cultural considerations. Research study methods included qualitative, quantitative or both. The review included any health-related profession and level of learner. Three studies met the criteria. The purposes of the three studies were significantly different and did not directly study cultural considerations in debriefing. The learner-educator relationship is at risk and learning may be negatively impacted without addressing cultural awareness. More studies are needed to fully describe the effect of culture on successful debriefing.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Conversations are influenced by cultural perceptions, beliefs and values. Debriefing is a learning conversation. Without cross-cultural engagement or culturally relevant teaching, learning may be compromised and may result in an outcome opposite of that intended.
Objective
UNASSIGNED
This systematic review explores cultural considerations in healthcare simulation debriefing. We sought to explore findings that could help debriefers create culturally responsive and inclusive debriefings.
Study selection
UNASSIGNED
Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed articles in any language and focused on healthcare simulation debriefing and global cultural considerations. Research study methods included qualitative, quantitative or both. The review included any health-related profession and level of learner.
Findings
UNASSIGNED
Three studies met the criteria. The purposes of the three studies were significantly different and did not directly study cultural considerations in debriefing.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
The learner-educator relationship is at risk and learning may be negatively impacted without addressing cultural awareness. More studies are needed to fully describe the effect of culture on successful debriefing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35520973
doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000857
pii: bmjstel-2020-000857
pmc: PMC8936728
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
605-610Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Med Educ. 2014 Jul;48(7):657-66
pubmed: 24909527
Med Educ. 2008 Mar;42(3):266-70
pubmed: 18275413
Simul Healthc. 2006 Spring;1(1):49-55
pubmed: 19088574
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 May;17(2):269-78
pubmed: 21161680
Qual Health Res. 2010 Dec;20(12):1736-43
pubmed: 20671302
Nurse Educ. 2021 Sep-Oct 01;46(5):268-270
pubmed: 33290303
Simul Healthc. 2017 Jun;12(3):135-138
pubmed: 28151774
Glob Health Action. 2014 Feb 13;7:23611
pubmed: 24560265
Simul Healthc. 2018 Aug;13(4):239-246
pubmed: 29672469
Med Teach. 2016;38(3):255-62
pubmed: 25776229
Simul Healthc. 2021 Dec 1;16(6):407-413
pubmed: 34009910
Simul Healthc. 2020 Oct;15(5):326-334
pubmed: 33003188
Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):10-28
pubmed: 16147767
Simul Healthc. 2007 Summer;2(2):115-25
pubmed: 19088616
Simul Healthc. 2016 Aug;11(4):238-48
pubmed: 27465839
Simul Healthc. 2016 Jun;11(3):209-17
pubmed: 27254527
J Stud Int Educ. 2017 Jul;21(3):278-290
pubmed: 29046607
Simul Healthc. 2018 Oct;13(5):363-370
pubmed: 30216273
J Transcult Nurs. 2016 May;27(3):210-7
pubmed: 26122618
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Jun;34(6):e58-63
pubmed: 24169444
Simul Healthc. 2013 Jun;8(3):166-70
pubmed: 23702587