Development and impact of an endoscopic non-technical skills (ENTS) behavioural marker system.
assessment
behavioural marker system
endoscopy
non-technical skills
training
Journal
BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning
ISSN: 2056-6697
Titre abrégé: BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101684779
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
accepted:
19
02
2020
entrez:
6
5
2022
pubmed:
6
3
2020
medline:
6
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Non-technical skills (NTS) are crucial to effective team working in endoscopy. Training in NTS has been shown to improve team performance and patient outcomes. As such, NTS training and assessment are now considered essential components of the endoscopy quality assurance process. Across the literature, other specialties have achieved this through development of behavioural marker systems (BMS). BMS provide a framework for assessing, training and measuring the NTS relevant to healthcare individuals and team. This article describes the development and impact of a novel BMS for endoscopy: the endoscopic non-technical skills (ENTS) system. The initial NTS taxonomy for endoscopy was created through a combination of literature review, staff focus groups and semi-structured interviews, incorporating the critical decision method. Framework analysis was conducted with three individual coders and generated a skills list which formed the preliminary taxonomy. Video observation of Bowel Cancer Screening endoscopists was used to identify exemplar behaviours which were mapped to relevant skills in the NTS taxonomy. Behavioural descriptors, derived from video data, were added to form the basis of the ENTS system. A taxonomy of 33 skills in 14 separate categories were identified through framework analysis. Following video analysis and behaviour mapping, 4 overarching categories and 13 behavioural elements were identified which formed the ENTS framework. The endoscopy (directly observed procedural skills) 4-point rating scale was added to create the final ENTS system. Since its development in 2010, the ENTS system has been validated in the assessment of endoscopy for trainees nationally. ENTS informs a number of training initiatives, including a national strategy to improve NTS for all endoscopists. The ENTS system is a clinically relevant tool, validated for use in trainee assessment. The use of ENTS will be important to the future of training and quality assurance in endoscopy.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Non-technical skills (NTS) are crucial to effective team working in endoscopy. Training in NTS has been shown to improve team performance and patient outcomes. As such, NTS training and assessment are now considered essential components of the endoscopy quality assurance process. Across the literature, other specialties have achieved this through development of behavioural marker systems (BMS). BMS provide a framework for assessing, training and measuring the NTS relevant to healthcare individuals and team. This article describes the development and impact of a novel BMS for endoscopy: the endoscopic non-technical skills (ENTS) system.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
The initial NTS taxonomy for endoscopy was created through a combination of literature review, staff focus groups and semi-structured interviews, incorporating the critical decision method. Framework analysis was conducted with three individual coders and generated a skills list which formed the preliminary taxonomy. Video observation of Bowel Cancer Screening endoscopists was used to identify exemplar behaviours which were mapped to relevant skills in the NTS taxonomy. Behavioural descriptors, derived from video data, were added to form the basis of the ENTS system.
Results
UNASSIGNED
A taxonomy of 33 skills in 14 separate categories were identified through framework analysis. Following video analysis and behaviour mapping, 4 overarching categories and 13 behavioural elements were identified which formed the ENTS framework. The endoscopy (directly observed procedural skills) 4-point rating scale was added to create the final ENTS system. Since its development in 2010, the ENTS system has been validated in the assessment of endoscopy for trainees nationally. ENTS informs a number of training initiatives, including a national strategy to improve NTS for all endoscopists.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
The ENTS system is a clinically relevant tool, validated for use in trainee assessment. The use of ENTS will be important to the future of training and quality assurance in endoscopy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35521085
doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000526
pii: bmjstel-2019-000526
pmc: PMC8936727
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
17-25Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: KW reports grants from National Institute for Health Research, non-financial support and other from Royal Colleges of Physicians (UK), other from Health Education England, grants and other from General Medical Council, outside the submitted work. ST-G reports educational grants from Norgine, Aquilant and Olympus.
Références
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Feb;212(2):234-243.e1-5
pubmed: 21276535
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015 May 13;32(2):Doc19
pubmed: 26038684
Med Educ. 2006 Nov;40(11):1098-104
pubmed: 17054619
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Dec;23(12):1031-9
pubmed: 25157188
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018 Dec;67(6):e111-e116
pubmed: 30216204
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jul;22(7):596-605
pubmed: 23513239
World J Surg. 2006 Oct;30(10):1774-83
pubmed: 16983480
Br J Anaesth. 2003 May;90(5):580-8
pubmed: 12697584
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1:i57-64
pubmed: 15465957
J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Apr;19(2):317-23
pubmed: 22502593
World J Surg. 2008 Apr;32(4):548-56
pubmed: 18259809
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Apr;110(4):529-44
pubmed: 23454826
World J Surg. 2007 Jul;31(7):1373-81
pubmed: 17487527
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;25(2):215-27
pubmed: 21550546
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Mar;20(3):216-22
pubmed: 21209142
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Apr;18(2):104-8
pubmed: 19342523
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 14;20(46):17507-15
pubmed: 25516665
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Oct;20(5):582-8
pubmed: 24798683
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011 Jul;12(4):406-14
pubmed: 20935588
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1:i80-4
pubmed: 15465960
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;10(2):160-166
pubmed: 31205657
ANZ J Surg. 2009 Mar;79(3):154-60
pubmed: 19317781
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2012 Apr;3(2):86-89
pubmed: 28839641
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 04;9(3):e90320
pubmed: 24594911
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Sep;33(9):549-58
pubmed: 17915529
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr;9(2):129-134
pubmed: 29588841