Determinants of neonatal near miss among neonates admitted to public hospitals in Southern Ethiopia, 2021: A case-control study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
14
09
2021
accepted:
15
04
2022
entrez:
6
5
2022
pubmed:
7
5
2022
medline:
11
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Neonatal near-miss (NNM) cases refer to situations in which babies are on the verge of dying between the ages of 0 and 28 days due to severe morbidity that occurs during pregnancy, delivery, or extra-uterine life, but survive either by luck or due to high-quality health care. Identifying NNM cases and addressing their determinants is crucial for devising comprehensive and relevant interventions to tackle neonatal morbidity and mortality. Hence, this study aimed at finding out the determinants of NNM in neonates admitted to public hospitals in Hadiya zone, southern Ethiopia. A hospital-based unmatched case-control study was conducted in three selected hospitals in southern Ethiopia from May 1 to June 30, 2021. A total of 484 participants took part in the study (121 cases and 363 controls). Controls were chosen using systematic sampling approaches, whereas cases were recruited consecutively at the time of discharge. Cases were selected based on the Latin American Centre for Perinatology (CLAP) criteria of an NNM. A structured interviewer-administered questionnaire and a data extraction checklist were used for data collection. The Data were entered into Epi-Data version 3.1 and exported to SPSS version 23 for analysis. A multivariable logistic regression analysis with a p-value of <0.05 was used to determine the determinants of NNM. Ninety-seven (80.1%) and 56 (46.2%) near-miss cases encountered at least one pragmatic and management criteria, respectively. The most common pragmatic and management criteria were gestational age less than 33 weeks (44.6%) and intravenous antibiotic usage up to 7 days and before 28 days of life (27.3%), respectively. A short birth interval [AOR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.29, 3.57], lack of ANC [AOR = 3.37; 95%CI: 1.35, 6.39], Caesarean mode of delivery [AOR = 2.24; 95%CI: 1.20, 4.16], the occurrence of a third maternal delay [AOR = 3.47; 95% CI: 2.11, 5.75], and poor birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR) plan[AOR = 2.50; 95% CI: 1.49,4.13] were identified as a significant determinants of NNM. The provision of adequate ANC should be a priority for health care providers at service delivery points. To avoid serious neonatal problems, mothers who deliver by Cesarean section should receive more attention from their families and health care providers. Health care providers in the ANC unit should encourage pregnant women to implement the WHO-recommended elements of the BPCR plan. To achieve optimal birth spacing, healthcare providers should focus on the contraceptive provision. Unnecessary delays in health facilities during childbirth should be avoided at all costs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Neonatal near-miss (NNM) cases refer to situations in which babies are on the verge of dying between the ages of 0 and 28 days due to severe morbidity that occurs during pregnancy, delivery, or extra-uterine life, but survive either by luck or due to high-quality health care. Identifying NNM cases and addressing their determinants is crucial for devising comprehensive and relevant interventions to tackle neonatal morbidity and mortality. Hence, this study aimed at finding out the determinants of NNM in neonates admitted to public hospitals in Hadiya zone, southern Ethiopia.
METHODS
A hospital-based unmatched case-control study was conducted in three selected hospitals in southern Ethiopia from May 1 to June 30, 2021. A total of 484 participants took part in the study (121 cases and 363 controls). Controls were chosen using systematic sampling approaches, whereas cases were recruited consecutively at the time of discharge. Cases were selected based on the Latin American Centre for Perinatology (CLAP) criteria of an NNM. A structured interviewer-administered questionnaire and a data extraction checklist were used for data collection. The Data were entered into Epi-Data version 3.1 and exported to SPSS version 23 for analysis. A multivariable logistic regression analysis with a p-value of <0.05 was used to determine the determinants of NNM.
RESULTS
Ninety-seven (80.1%) and 56 (46.2%) near-miss cases encountered at least one pragmatic and management criteria, respectively. The most common pragmatic and management criteria were gestational age less than 33 weeks (44.6%) and intravenous antibiotic usage up to 7 days and before 28 days of life (27.3%), respectively. A short birth interval [AOR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.29, 3.57], lack of ANC [AOR = 3.37; 95%CI: 1.35, 6.39], Caesarean mode of delivery [AOR = 2.24; 95%CI: 1.20, 4.16], the occurrence of a third maternal delay [AOR = 3.47; 95% CI: 2.11, 5.75], and poor birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR) plan[AOR = 2.50; 95% CI: 1.49,4.13] were identified as a significant determinants of NNM.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
The provision of adequate ANC should be a priority for health care providers at service delivery points. To avoid serious neonatal problems, mothers who deliver by Cesarean section should receive more attention from their families and health care providers. Health care providers in the ANC unit should encourage pregnant women to implement the WHO-recommended elements of the BPCR plan. To achieve optimal birth spacing, healthcare providers should focus on the contraceptive provision. Unnecessary delays in health facilities during childbirth should be avoided at all costs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35522663
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268041
pii: PONE-D-21-29699
pmc: PMC9075625
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0268041Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2013 May-Jun;89(3):269-77
pubmed: 23680300
J Urban Health. 2011 Jun;88 Suppl 2:S356-69
pubmed: 20700769
BJOG. 2014 Mar;121 Suppl 1:110-8
pubmed: 24641541
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 3;16(2):e0246243
pubmed: 33534844
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 04;8(6):e65160
pubmed: 23750240
Cad Saude Publica. 2017 May 18;33(4):e00179115
pubmed: 28538795
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Dec 7;11(1):872
pubmed: 30526644
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Feb 12;21(1):125
pubmed: 33579215
PLoS One. 2021 May 17;16(5):e0251826
pubmed: 33999941
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 17;359(3):262-73
pubmed: 18635431
J Perinatol. 2002 Sep;22(6):484-95
pubmed: 12168128
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jul 29;20(1):437
pubmed: 32727418
Lancet. 2005 Mar 5-11;365(9462):891-900
pubmed: 15752534
Arch Public Health. 2018 Feb 08;76:9
pubmed: 29445455
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 21;19(1):516
pubmed: 31864322
Public Health Rev. 2018 Dec 17;39:33
pubmed: 30574407
Sao Paulo Med J. 2001 Jan 4;119(1):33-42
pubmed: 11175624
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 Dec;70(12):820-6
pubmed: 26735223
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jun;7(6):e710-e720
pubmed: 31097275
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Feb 28;19(1):83
pubmed: 30819143
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Apr;89 Suppl 1:S7-24
pubmed: 15820369
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Oct 12;18(1):401
pubmed: 30314456
Int J Pediatr. 2020 Sep 07;2020:1092479
pubmed: 33014076
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Aug;29(5):542-59
pubmed: 23783832
Rev Saude Publica. 2018 Nov 29;52:95
pubmed: 30517522
J Perinatol. 2016 May;36 Suppl 1:S1-S11
pubmed: 27109087
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Jun;23(3):369-74
pubmed: 19201262
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2010 Jan-Feb;86(1):1-2
pubmed: 20151097
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 22;9(2):e024392
pubmed: 30798311
JAMA. 2006 Apr 19;295(15):1809-23
pubmed: 16622143
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Dec 01;15:320
pubmed: 26625905
Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):189-205
pubmed: 24853593
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Dec 04;51:111
pubmed: 29211204
Afr Health Sci. 2019 Mar;19(1):1554-1562
pubmed: 31148983
Cad Saude Publica. 2014 Aug;30 Suppl 1:S1-10
pubmed: 25167178
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019 Feb;69(1):50-55
pubmed: 30814810
Cad Saude Publica. 2014 Aug;30 Suppl 1:S1-15
pubmed: 25167179
BMC Pediatr. 2015 Apr 17;15:44
pubmed: 25928880