An evaluation of newborn hearing screening brochures and parental understanding of screening result terminology.


Journal

International journal of audiology
ISSN: 1708-8186
Titre abrégé: Int J Audiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101140017

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2023
Historique:
medline: 2 6 2023
pubmed: 7 5 2022
entrez: 6 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To assess the suitability of newborn hearing screening brochures by evaluating current state-level brochures and pregnant people's understanding of screening result terminology. In Study 1, state-level brochures were evaluated based on readability, design, picture appropriateness, and use of the word "refer." In Study 2, pregnant people completed a questionnaire that queried their understanding of and expected anxiety about three newborn hearing screening outcomes ("refer," "did not pass," and "pass"). In Study 1, 59 newborn hearing screening brochures were analysed. In Study 2, 43 pregnant people completed surveys during a prenatal appointment. Most of the brochures were found deficient on at least one element. Thirty percent of brochures used the word "refer" to indicate a hearing screening failure; yet, fewer than half of participants understood its meaning. Ratings of expected anxiety were highest in response to the term "did not pass." Based on four study criteria of brochure suitability, 88% of available state-level newborn hearing screening brochures should be modified to make them readily understandable by a broad educational demographic. Discretion in use of the term "refer" should be made when indicating screening results, because the term is not readily understood.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35522833
doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2068082
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

541-551

Auteurs

Erin M Picou (EM)

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Sarah N McAlexander (SN)

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Brittany C Day (BC)

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Karina J Jirik (KJ)

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Alison Kemph Morrison (AK)

Department of Communication Sciences and Special Education, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

Anne Marie Tharpe (AM)

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH