Demystifying the Black Box: The Importance of Interpretability of Predictive Models in Neurocritical Care.
Algorithms
Artificial intelligence
Clinical decision-making
Critical care
Machine learning
Journal
Neurocritical care
ISSN: 1556-0961
Titre abrégé: Neurocrit Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101156086
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
received:
30
11
2021
accepted:
29
03
2022
pubmed:
7
5
2022
medline:
4
8
2022
entrez:
6
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Neurocritical care patients are a complex patient population, and to aid clinical decision-making, many models and scoring systems have previously been developed. More recently, techniques from the field of machine learning have been applied to neurocritical care patient data to develop models with high levels of predictive accuracy. However, although these recent models appear clinically promising, their interpretability has often not been considered and they tend to be black box models, making it extremely difficult to understand how the model came to its conclusion. Interpretable machine learning methods have the potential to provide the means to overcome some of these issues but are largely unexplored within the neurocritical care domain. This article examines existing models used in neurocritical care from the perspective of interpretability. Further, the use of interpretable machine learning will be explored, in particular the potential benefits and drawbacks that the techniques may have when applied to neurocritical care data. Finding a solution to the lack of model explanation, transparency, and accountability is important because these issues have the potential to contribute to model trust and clinical acceptance, and, increasingly, regulation is stipulating a right to explanation for decisions made by models and algorithms. To ensure that the prospective gains from sophisticated predictive models to neurocritical care provision can be realized, it is imperative that interpretability of these models is fully considered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35523917
doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01504-4
pii: 10.1007/s12028-022-01504-4
pmc: PMC9343258
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
185-191Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
BMJ. 2008 Feb 23;336(7641):425-9
pubmed: 18270239
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e179-e191
pubmed: 33328078
Nat Mach Intell. 2019 May;1(5):206-215
pubmed: 35603010
Nat Methods. 2018 Apr;15(4):233-234
pubmed: 30100822
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Apr 1;27(4):592-600
pubmed: 32106285
BMJ. 2021 Oct 20;375:n2281
pubmed: 34670780
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;110:12-22
pubmed: 30763612
PLoS Med. 2008 Aug 5;5(8):e165; discussion e165
pubmed: 18684008
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 15;378(11):981-983
pubmed: 29539284
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 May 7;4(1):78
pubmed: 33963275
Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1979;28(1):13-6
pubmed: 290137
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2012;114:75-9
pubmed: 22327667
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 Feb 10;2016:371-380
pubmed: 28269832
J Biomed Inform. 2008 Jun;41(3):413-31
pubmed: 18343731
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Oct;98:103269
pubmed: 31430550
Crit Care. 2019 Aug 22;23(1):284
pubmed: 31439010
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997 Dec;63(6):721-31
pubmed: 9416805
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 12;9(1):1879
pubmed: 30755689
Front Neurol. 2020 Oct 09;11:554633
pubmed: 33162926
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD003843
pubmed: 17943802
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Dec 25;23(1):
pubmed: 33375658
Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29
pubmed: 3928249
J Intensive Care. 2019 Aug 16;7:44
pubmed: 31428430
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Nov;3(11):e745-e750
pubmed: 34711379
Physiol Meas. 1998 Aug;19(3):305-38
pubmed: 9735883
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;120(6):1451-7
pubmed: 24745709
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Apr 1;37(7):1011-1019
pubmed: 31744382
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 27;9(1):17672
pubmed: 31776366
Anesth Analg. 2003 Dec;97(6):1667-1674
pubmed: 14633540
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Sep 10;3(9):e0529
pubmed: 34589713
Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;40(8):2456-63
pubmed: 22622398