Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the "My Personal Breast Screening" (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial.


Journal

BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 May 2022
Historique:
received: 17 02 2022
accepted: 02 04 2022
entrez: 6 5 2022
pubmed: 7 5 2022
medline: 11 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The MyPeBS study is an ongoing randomised controlled trial testing whether a risk-stratified breast cancer screening strategy is non-inferior, or eventually superior, to standard age-based screening at reducing incidence of stage 2 or more cancers. This large European Commission-funded initiative aims to include 85,000 women aged 40 to 70 years, without prior breast cancer and not previously identified at high risk in six countries (Belgium, France, Italy, Israel, Spain, UK). A specific work package within MyPeBS examines psychological, socio-economic and ethical aspects of this new screening strategy. It compares women's reported data and outcomes in both trial arms on the following issues: general anxiety, cancer-related worry, understanding of breast cancer screening strategy and information-seeking behaviour, socio-demographic and economic characteristics, quality of life, risk perception, intention to change health-related behaviours, satisfaction with the trial. At inclusion, 3-months, 1-year and 4-years, each woman participating in MyPeBS is asked to fill online questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, subgroup comparisons and analysis of variations over time will be performed with appropriate tests to assess differences between arms. Multivariate regression models will allow modelling of different patient reported data and outcomes such as comprehension of the information provided, general anxiety or cancer worry, and information seeking behaviour. In addition, a qualitative study (48 semi-structured interviews conducted in France and in the UK with women randomised in the risk-stratified arm), will help further understand participants' acceptability and comprehension of the trial, and their experience of risk assessment. Beyond the scientific and medical objectives of this clinical study, it is critical to acknowledge the consequences of such a paradigm shift for women. Indeed, introducing a risk-based screening relying on individual biological differences also implies addressing non-biological differences (e.g. social status or health literacy) from an ethical perspective, to ensure equal access to healthcare. The results of the present study will facilitate making recommendations on implementation at the end of the trial to accompany any potential change in screening strategy. Study sponsor: UNICANCER. My personalised breast screening (MyPeBS). gov (2018) available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03672331 Contact: Cécile VISSAC SABATIER, PhD, + 33 (0)1 73 79 77 58 ext + 330,142,114,293, contact@mypebs.eu.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The MyPeBS study is an ongoing randomised controlled trial testing whether a risk-stratified breast cancer screening strategy is non-inferior, or eventually superior, to standard age-based screening at reducing incidence of stage 2 or more cancers. This large European Commission-funded initiative aims to include 85,000 women aged 40 to 70 years, without prior breast cancer and not previously identified at high risk in six countries (Belgium, France, Italy, Israel, Spain, UK). A specific work package within MyPeBS examines psychological, socio-economic and ethical aspects of this new screening strategy. It compares women's reported data and outcomes in both trial arms on the following issues: general anxiety, cancer-related worry, understanding of breast cancer screening strategy and information-seeking behaviour, socio-demographic and economic characteristics, quality of life, risk perception, intention to change health-related behaviours, satisfaction with the trial.
METHODS METHODS
At inclusion, 3-months, 1-year and 4-years, each woman participating in MyPeBS is asked to fill online questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, subgroup comparisons and analysis of variations over time will be performed with appropriate tests to assess differences between arms. Multivariate regression models will allow modelling of different patient reported data and outcomes such as comprehension of the information provided, general anxiety or cancer worry, and information seeking behaviour. In addition, a qualitative study (48 semi-structured interviews conducted in France and in the UK with women randomised in the risk-stratified arm), will help further understand participants' acceptability and comprehension of the trial, and their experience of risk assessment.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
Beyond the scientific and medical objectives of this clinical study, it is critical to acknowledge the consequences of such a paradigm shift for women. Indeed, introducing a risk-based screening relying on individual biological differences also implies addressing non-biological differences (e.g. social status or health literacy) from an ethical perspective, to ensure equal access to healthcare. The results of the present study will facilitate making recommendations on implementation at the end of the trial to accompany any potential change in screening strategy.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
Study sponsor: UNICANCER. My personalised breast screening (MyPeBS).
CLINICALTRIALS RESULTS
gov (2018) available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03672331 Contact: Cécile VISSAC SABATIER, PhD, + 33 (0)1 73 79 77 58 ext + 330,142,114,293, contact@mypebs.eu.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35524202
doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09484-6
pii: 10.1186/s12885-022-09484-6
pmc: PMC9073478
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03672331']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Protocol Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

507

Subventions

Organisme : H2020 European Research Council
ID : 755394

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Br J Cancer. 2004 Jul 5;91(1):69-76
pubmed: 15199386
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun;174(6):954-61
pubmed: 24756610
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Apr;64(4):318-24
pubmed: 19740776
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
Epidemiology. 2012 Jan;23(1):119-28
pubmed: 21989136
Br J Clin Psychol. 1992 Sep;31(3):301-6
pubmed: 1393159
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 May;64(5):402-6
pubmed: 23741561
J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 04;11(6):
pubmed: 34199804
Breast. 2018 Jun;39:24-32
pubmed: 29529454
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Aug 16;15:64
pubmed: 25127662
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Mar;17(13):1-170, v-vi
pubmed: 23540978
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2001 Jun;49(3):299-313
pubmed: 11427832
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Med Decis Making. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):362-75
pubmed: 21865607
Oncotarget. 2016 Mar 15;7(11):12885-92
pubmed: 26883201
Health Psychol. 1991;10(4):259-67
pubmed: 1915212
J Public Health (Oxf). 2014 Jun;36(2):285-91
pubmed: 23986542
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Feb;94(2):149-57
pubmed: 24207115
Br J Cancer. 2022 Mar;126(4):673-688
pubmed: 34837076
Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Apr;86(4):317-9
pubmed: 18438522
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Jan 3;104(1):21-34
pubmed: 30554720
Health Expect. 2003 Jun;6(2):128-39
pubmed: 12752741
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258
pubmed: 25791983
Br J Cancer. 2004 Nov 29;91(11):1887-92
pubmed: 15534608
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):215-25
pubmed: 26756606
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 18;13(16):
pubmed: 34439302
Lancet. 2015 Apr 25;385(9978):1642-52
pubmed: 25701273
CMAJ. 2018 Apr 9;190(14):E422-E429
pubmed: 29632037
Breast. 2018 Feb;37:148-153
pubmed: 29161653
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Oct;189(3):593-598
pubmed: 34529196
Ann Intern Med. 2021 May;174(5):710-711
pubmed: 33556272
Int J Cancer. 2020 Apr 15;146(8):2104-2112
pubmed: 31254388
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):256-67
pubmed: 26756737
Nat Genet. 2013 Apr;45(4):349-51
pubmed: 23535723
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Aug 2;113(8):1017-1026
pubmed: 33515225
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 16;13:658
pubmed: 23855504
Br J Cancer. 2018 Jun;118(12):1648-1657
pubmed: 29736008
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov;17(11):687-705
pubmed: 32555420
J Med Screen. 2015 Dec;22(4):165-7
pubmed: 26018778
Psychooncology. 2019 Sep;28(9):1836-1844
pubmed: 31240803
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 08;14:9
pubmed: 24397342
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999;(25):15-20
pubmed: 10854451
Public Health Genomics. 2018;21(1-2):37-44
pubmed: 30223261
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2353-8
pubmed: 26039523
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 18;20(1):570
pubmed: 32552763
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Feb;94(2):230-7
pubmed: 24325874
Cancer Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;60:77-85
pubmed: 30927689
Health Policy. 2009 Jul;91(2):162-73
pubmed: 19150577
Genet Med. 2019 Feb;21(2):505-509
pubmed: 29970926

Auteurs

Alexandra Roux (A)

IRIS (UMR8156 CNRS & U997 INSERM), Paris 13 University, Aubervilliers, France.

Rachel Cholerton (R)

University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Jonathan Sicsic (J)

Université de Paris, LIRAES F-75006, Paris, France.

Nora Moumjid (N)

Université Lyon 1, P2S EA 4129, Centre Léon Bérard, F-69373, Lyon, France.

David P French (DP)

University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Paolo Giorgi Rossi (P)

AUSL - IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Corinne Balleyguier (C)

Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Michal Guindy (M)

Assuta Medical Centers, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ben Gurion University, Beersheba, Israel.

Fiona J Gilbert (FJ)

University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Jean-Benoit Burrion (JB)

Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium.

Xavier Castells (X)

IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.

David Ritchie (D)

European Cancer Leagues, Brussels, Belgium.

Debbie Keatley (D)

Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, UK.

Camille Baron (C)

Unicancer, Paris, France.

Suzette Delaloge (S)

Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Unicancer, Paris, France.

Sandrine de Montgolfier (S)

IRIS (UMR8156 CNRS & U997 INSERM), Paris 13 University, Aubervilliers, France. sandrine.demontgolfier@u-pec.fr.
Paris Est Creteil University, Créteil, France. sandrine.demontgolfier@u-pec.fr.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH