The predictive performance of surgical treatment in upper molars with combined bony defect and furcation involvement: a retrospective cohort study.
Furcation involvement
Guided tissue regeneration
Intrabony defect
Osseous resective surgery
Periodontal regeneration
Residual pocket
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 05 2022
06 05 2022
Historique:
received:
03
02
2022
accepted:
21
04
2022
entrez:
6
5
2022
pubmed:
7
5
2022
medline:
11
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate the impact of combined defects, bony destruction and furcation involvement, on disease resolution after surgery in terms of pocket elimination, absence of inflammation, furcation improvement and predictive performance. Combined bony (intrabony (+) or (-)) and furcation defects (FI degree 1 or 2) at maxillary molars in patients diagnosed as periodontitis stage III to IV, being through periodontal surgery and at least 6 months follow-up were retrospectively screened. Cumulative predictability (CR, %), failure of treatment and the change of clinical parameters from baseline at pre-operative visit to the latest maintenance care, including pocket depth (PD), horizontal and vertical furcation involvement (FI) were analyzed. Failure of treatment with low predictability was defined as residual PD > 4 mm with bleeding on probing during maintenance period. Thirty-three patients with fifty-one combined defects were included. Statistical analysis showed significant overall PD reduction and FI improvement (p < 0.001). Combined FI degree 2 with intrabony (+) defects revealed more horizontal furcation improvement compared with FI degree 2 with suprabony defect (p = 0.007). However, type of combined defects was not relevant to CR (p = 0.702) and PD reduction (p = 0.707). Among all parameters, baseline PD with proximal FI degree 2 was indicated to failure of treatment. Different types of combined defects, deep baseline pocket and proximal FI degree 2 would compromise the predictability of treatment outcomes in upper molars. Nevertheless, the combination of surgical treatment and strict maintenance care could still yield high predictability and survival rate. retrospectively registered.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the impact of combined defects, bony destruction and furcation involvement, on disease resolution after surgery in terms of pocket elimination, absence of inflammation, furcation improvement and predictive performance.
METHODS
Combined bony (intrabony (+) or (-)) and furcation defects (FI degree 1 or 2) at maxillary molars in patients diagnosed as periodontitis stage III to IV, being through periodontal surgery and at least 6 months follow-up were retrospectively screened. Cumulative predictability (CR, %), failure of treatment and the change of clinical parameters from baseline at pre-operative visit to the latest maintenance care, including pocket depth (PD), horizontal and vertical furcation involvement (FI) were analyzed. Failure of treatment with low predictability was defined as residual PD > 4 mm with bleeding on probing during maintenance period.
RESULTS
Thirty-three patients with fifty-one combined defects were included. Statistical analysis showed significant overall PD reduction and FI improvement (p < 0.001). Combined FI degree 2 with intrabony (+) defects revealed more horizontal furcation improvement compared with FI degree 2 with suprabony defect (p = 0.007). However, type of combined defects was not relevant to CR (p = 0.702) and PD reduction (p = 0.707). Among all parameters, baseline PD with proximal FI degree 2 was indicated to failure of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
Different types of combined defects, deep baseline pocket and proximal FI degree 2 would compromise the predictability of treatment outcomes in upper molars. Nevertheless, the combination of surgical treatment and strict maintenance care could still yield high predictability and survival rate.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
retrospectively registered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35524218
doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02196-0
pii: 10.1186/s12903-022-02196-0
pmc: PMC9074367
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
156Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Periodontol. 2003 Sep;74(9):1255-68
pubmed: 14584858
J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Jun;47(6):756-767
pubmed: 32145035
J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Dec;37(12):1100-9
pubmed: 20735795
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997 Dec;17(6):516-27
pubmed: 9497738
J Periodontol. 2020 Sep;91(9):1148-1158
pubmed: 32012266
Periodontol 2000. 2005;39:30-9
pubmed: 16135062
Periodontol 2000. 2000 Feb;22:8-21
pubmed: 11276518
J Periodontal Res. 1999 Aug;34(6):310-22
pubmed: 10633886
J Periodontol. 2020 Feb;91(2):165-173
pubmed: 31376157
J Periodontol. 2004 Mar;75(3):399-407
pubmed: 15088878
J Periodontol. 2021 May;92(5):662-669
pubmed: 33011996
J Periodontol. 2004 Aug;75(8):1150-60
pubmed: 15455745
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Mar;45(3):373-381
pubmed: 29219193
J Periodontol. 2015 Feb;86(2 Suppl):S77-104
pubmed: 25216204
J Periodontol. 1984 Sep;55(9):505-9
pubmed: 6592322
J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S173-S182
pubmed: 29926951
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 Sep/Oct;40(5):693-701
pubmed: 32925999
J Clin Periodontol. 1975 Apr;2(2):80-6
pubmed: 1094035
J Periodontal Res. 1978 Nov;13(6):563-72
pubmed: 153396
J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Jan;48(1):100-113
pubmed: 33025619
J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Jul;47 Suppl 22:352-374
pubmed: 31860125
J Periodontol. 1984 May;55(5):283-4
pubmed: 6588186
Periodontol 2000. 2015 Jun;68(1):282-307
pubmed: 25867990
Periodontol 2000. 2015 Jun;68(1):308-32
pubmed: 25867991
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000 Feb;20(1):19-29
pubmed: 11203545
J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Aug;35(8):685-95
pubmed: 18549447
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Feb;23(1):47-55
pubmed: 12617368
J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Nov;44(11):1140-1144
pubmed: 28771794
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Oct;42(10):943-50
pubmed: 26399690
J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Aug;44(8):813-821
pubmed: 28699678
J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Jan;44(1):58-66
pubmed: 27736011
J Clin Periodontol. 2022 Jun;49 Suppl 24:121-148
pubmed: 34761413
J Periodontol. 2001 Dec;72(12):1639-46
pubmed: 11811498
J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Mar;48(3):410-430
pubmed: 33289191
J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Jul;47 Suppl 22:303-319
pubmed: 31912516
J Periodontol. 1979 May;50(5):234-44
pubmed: 287779
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jul;46(7):699-712
pubmed: 31025366
J Clin Periodontol. 1975 Aug;2(3):126-35
pubmed: 1058213
J Periodontol. 2015 Feb;86(2 Suppl):S108-30
pubmed: 25644295
J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jul;41(7):701-7
pubmed: 24766602
J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Feb;43(2):156-66
pubmed: 26932323
J Periodontol. 2017 Jun;88(6):536-542
pubmed: 28398116
J Periodontol. 2022 Apr;93(4):548-559
pubmed: 34258767
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Oct;23(5):507-12
pubmed: 14620125
J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Jul;47 Suppl 22:4-60
pubmed: 32383274
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Nov;85(11):867-72
pubmed: 18038077
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Mar;40(3):252-9
pubmed: 23379539
J Periodontol. 1996 Jul;67(7):658-65
pubmed: 8832476
J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Jul;47 Suppl 22:61-71
pubmed: 31912527
Periodontol 2000. 2000 Feb;22:59-87
pubmed: 11276517
J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Feb;44(2):169-177
pubmed: 28028838
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46(6):650-658
pubmed: 30972774
Clin Oral Investig. 2004 Jun;8(2):70-4
pubmed: 14767696
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;33(2):e58-64
pubmed: 23484181
J Periodontol. 2009 Nov;80(11):1756-64
pubmed: 19905945