Illness perceptions, self-care practices, and glycemic control among type 2 diabetes patients in Chiang Mai, Thailand.
HbA1c
Self-care
Self-management
T2DM
Thailand
Journal
Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique
ISSN: 0778-7367
Titre abrégé: Arch Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9208826
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 May 2022
07 May 2022
Historique:
received:
18
08
2021
accepted:
01
05
2022
entrez:
7
5
2022
pubmed:
8
5
2022
medline:
8
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) is a fundamental aspect of diabetes care, but no standard program exists in Thailand. Understanding current patterns of illness perceptions (concerns) and self-management practices among patients with diabetes in Thailand is vital to develop culturally tailored DSME programs. This study sought to explore the association between reported self-management practices and diabetes perceptions on glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. Specifically, the study examined whether the association between illness perceptions and diabetes control was mediated by self-management. This was a cross-sectional study conducted among type 2 diabetes patients on outpatient care and follow-up in four districts hospitals in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Illness perceptions was measured by the Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (BIPQ). Self-management practices were measured by Summary Diabetes Self-Care activities (SDSCA). For illness perceptions and self-management practices, patients were classified into two groups, high level and low level based on the median values. Univariate and multivariable analyses were done to determine the association between the determinant factors: self-care practices and illness perceptions and the outcome of interest- good glycemic control (HbA1c < 7%). Of the 200 participants recruited into the study, 180 completed the questionnaire. Only 35% of participants had good glycemic control (HBA1c < 7.0). Both illness perceptions and self-management practices were independently linked to glycemic control. Among illness perceptions, a sense of personal control was strongly associated with good glycemic control (p = 0.01). For self-management, appropriate diet (p = 0.03) and medication adherence (p = 0.05) were associated with good glycemic control. After adjustments for key baseline characteristics, patients with high levels of illness perceptions were less likely to achieve glycemic control (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.14, p = 0.11) and those with high level of self-management were more likely to achieve glycemic control (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.30, p = 0.04). The effect size for illness perception attenuated when further adjusted for levels of self-management (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.96, p = 0.75) while the effect size for self-management and glycemic control did not materially change (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.06 to 5.02, p = 0.04). Illness perceptions and self-management practices are associated with glycemic control. Future culturally tailored interventions in Thailand aimed at improving glycemic should focus on personal control, improving diet and treatment adherence as these are more likely to help improve diabetes control as demonstrated in this study.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) is a fundamental aspect of diabetes care, but no standard program exists in Thailand. Understanding current patterns of illness perceptions (concerns) and self-management practices among patients with diabetes in Thailand is vital to develop culturally tailored DSME programs. This study sought to explore the association between reported self-management practices and diabetes perceptions on glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. Specifically, the study examined whether the association between illness perceptions and diabetes control was mediated by self-management.
METHODS
METHODS
This was a cross-sectional study conducted among type 2 diabetes patients on outpatient care and follow-up in four districts hospitals in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Illness perceptions was measured by the Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (BIPQ). Self-management practices were measured by Summary Diabetes Self-Care activities (SDSCA). For illness perceptions and self-management practices, patients were classified into two groups, high level and low level based on the median values. Univariate and multivariable analyses were done to determine the association between the determinant factors: self-care practices and illness perceptions and the outcome of interest- good glycemic control (HbA1c < 7%).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of the 200 participants recruited into the study, 180 completed the questionnaire. Only 35% of participants had good glycemic control (HBA1c < 7.0). Both illness perceptions and self-management practices were independently linked to glycemic control. Among illness perceptions, a sense of personal control was strongly associated with good glycemic control (p = 0.01). For self-management, appropriate diet (p = 0.03) and medication adherence (p = 0.05) were associated with good glycemic control. After adjustments for key baseline characteristics, patients with high levels of illness perceptions were less likely to achieve glycemic control (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.14, p = 0.11) and those with high level of self-management were more likely to achieve glycemic control (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.30, p = 0.04). The effect size for illness perception attenuated when further adjusted for levels of self-management (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.96, p = 0.75) while the effect size for self-management and glycemic control did not materially change (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.06 to 5.02, p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Illness perceptions and self-management practices are associated with glycemic control. Future culturally tailored interventions in Thailand aimed at improving glycemic should focus on personal control, improving diet and treatment adherence as these are more likely to help improve diabetes control as demonstrated in this study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35524335
doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00888-1
pii: 10.1186/s13690-022-00888-1
pmc: PMC9078014
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
134Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R020876/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Thailand Research Fund
ID : DBG6180007
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
BMC Endocr Disord. 2019 Aug 29;19(1):91
pubmed: 31464602
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Aug 21;21(1):173
pubmed: 32825811
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2017 Jul 12;12(1):34
pubmed: 28701196
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):e020677
pubmed: 30121593
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Jan;123:37-48
pubmed: 27918976
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Mar 29;12:83
pubmed: 22458767
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 5;9(3):e023401
pubmed: 30842107
Crit Care. 2002 Feb;6(1):66-71
pubmed: 11940268
Int J Clin Pract. 2005 Nov;59(11):1345-55
pubmed: 16236091
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S55-S64
pubmed: 29222377
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 13;6(12):e014102
pubmed: 27974373
Nurs Health Sci. 2007 Jun;9(2):135-41
pubmed: 17470188
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Aug;76(2):213-9
pubmed: 19181476
WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2016 Apr;5(1):27-33
pubmed: 28604394
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 5;10(10):e036963
pubmed: 33020090
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 9;11(12):e056141
pubmed: 34887283
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2007;19(1):43-9
pubmed: 17784659
Psychol Health. 2015;30(11):1361-85
pubmed: 26181764
Public Health. 2014 Oct;128(10):886-95
pubmed: 25369353
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Jun;17(6):533-540
pubmed: 25678212
Diabetes Care. 2000 Jul;23(7):943-50
pubmed: 10895844
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
PLoS One. 2018 May 2;13(5):e0196719
pubmed: 29718952
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Jul 4;12(1):380
pubmed: 31272496
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019 May 16;12:717-727
pubmed: 31190931
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 12;11(1):14260
pubmed: 34253809
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jun;99(6):926-43
pubmed: 26658704
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0226286
pubmed: 31940366
Lancet. 2011 Jul 9;378(9786):99
pubmed: 21742159
Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Nov 16;7(2):254-62
pubmed: 25716379
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82
pubmed: 3806354
J Psychosom Res. 2006 Jun;60(6):631-7
pubmed: 16731240
Endocrine. 2017 Mar;55(3):712-731
pubmed: 27837440
Diabetes Manag (Lond). 2015;5(6):499-510
pubmed: 30100925
Diabet Med. 2011 Nov;28(11):1300-10
pubmed: 21418098
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jan 26;11:53
pubmed: 21266087
JAMA. 2015 Jun 16;313(23):2319-20
pubmed: 25996138
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Aug 10;10(1):381
pubmed: 28797280
Behav Sci (Basel). 2017 Apr 14;7(2):
pubmed: 28420098
Clin Diabetes. 2017 Dec;35(5):281-285
pubmed: 29263570
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;20(2):163-7
pubmed: 17278916
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009 Jun;84(3):245-51
pubmed: 19285741
Clin Diabetes. 2016 Apr;34(2):70-80
pubmed: 27092016
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 14;8(12):e024262
pubmed: 30552277