O-Arm Navigated Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Lower Cervical Fracture-Dislocation.
Blood Loss, Surgical
Cervical Vertebrae
/ injuries
Fracture Dislocation
/ surgery
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
/ methods
Joint Dislocations
/ surgery
Pedicle Screws
Retrospective Studies
Spinal Fractures
/ surgery
Spinal Fusion
/ methods
Surgery, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
Cervical pedicle screw
Navigation
O-arm
Journal
Orthopaedic surgery
ISSN: 1757-7861
Titre abrégé: Orthop Surg
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101501666
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
revised:
12
01
2022
received:
07
06
2020
accepted:
19
01
2022
pubmed:
8
5
2022
medline:
7
6
2022
entrez:
7
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement with O-arm navigation in the treatment of lower cervical fracture-dislocation. A retrospective clinical study was performed involving 42 consecutive patients with lower cervical spine fracture-dislocation who underwent CPS fixation surgery with O-arm navigation (CPS group) or received conventional lateral mass screw (LMS) fixation surgery (LMS group) between August 2015 and August 2019. Accuracy of CPS position was evaluated by postoperative CT. The clinical parameters including preoperative and final follow-up Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale, preoperative Sub-axial Injury Classification (SLIC) score, number of fixation segments, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, injury mechanism, injury location, surgical complications were also assessed between the two groups. In LMS group, the preoperative SLIC score was 7.5 ± 0.9, ASIA score improvement was 0.8 ± 0.5, JOA score improvement was 3.0 ± 1.8, mean operation time was 204 ± 89 min, intraoperative blood loss was 311 ± 127 ml. In CPS group, the preoperative SLIC score was 7.3 ± 1.2, ASIA score improvement was 0.9 ± 0.5, JOA score improvement was 3.2 ± 2.4, mean operation time is 241 ± 85 min, intraoperative blood loss is about 327 ± 120 ml. There was no significant difference in terms of above clinical parameters between the two groups (P > 0.05), the fixation segments in CPS group (3.5 ± 1.1) were less than that in LMS group (4.2 ± 0.7) (P = 0.037). The accuracy of CPS insertion was evaluated based on postoperative CT. Of all the 118 CPSs, 83 (70.3%) were defined as Grade 0; 27 (22.9%) as Grade 1; eight (6.8%) as Grade 2; and none as Grade 3. CPS malposition rate in this study was 6.8%. In this study, there was no direct intraoperative or postoperative complication caused by CPS or LMS insertion. All the operations were successfully completed in two groups. One of the patients in LMS group presented cerebrospinal fluid leak caused by bone fragment broken of the dural sac, which led to delayed incision healing. CPS group and LMS group both had two patients who suffered pulmonary infection after surgery. A total of 78.6% of the patients showed evidence of neurologic recovery. Satisfactory reduction was achieved in all cases and maintained throughout the follow-up duration. In the treatment of lower cervical spine fracture-dislocation, cervical pedicle screw insertion with O-arm navigation is a safe and effective method for posterior fixation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35524652
doi: 10.1111/os.13227
pmc: PMC9163967
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1135-1142Subventions
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of the Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province
ID : 16KJD320004
Organisme : Jiangsu Provincial Special Program of Medical Science
ID : BL2012004
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Nov;19(5):614-23
pubmed: 24033303
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Feb;(431):111-9
pubmed: 15685063
Eur Spine J. 2011 Mar;20(3):387-94
pubmed: 20936307
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jun;25(6):1690-7
pubmed: 26984875
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Feb 14;18(1):81
pubmed: 28196468
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Apr 15;25(8):962-9
pubmed: 10767809
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2004;71(6):366-72
pubmed: 15686638
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Apr;27(2):80-5
pubmed: 22373932
Neurosurgery. 2013 Mar;72 Suppl 2:73-83
pubmed: 23417180
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Feb;28(1):E1-8
pubmed: 24335725
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Nov 15;19(22):2529-39
pubmed: 7855677
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Feb 15;28(4):402-13
pubmed: 12590219
Asian Spine J. 2013 Jun;7(2):111-4
pubmed: 23741548
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Nov;15(5):472-8
pubmed: 21761967
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Jul;92(5):406-10
pubmed: 20487593
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Mar;16(3):238-47
pubmed: 22176430
Spine J. 2018 Mar;18(3):387-398
pubmed: 28739474
J Neurosurg. 2003 Oct;99(3 Suppl):257-63
pubmed: 14563142
Eur Spine J. 2012 Feb;21(2):282-8
pubmed: 21830078
Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23(10):2189-95
pubmed: 25095759
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Dec 1;37(25):E1580-7
pubmed: 23196967
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 May 1;22(9):977-82
pubmed: 9152447
Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23(10):2166-74
pubmed: 25047653
Eur Spine J. 2006 Mar;15(3):327-34
pubmed: 15912352
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Sep 15;40(18):1397-406
pubmed: 26426710
Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2729-2736
pubmed: 29651593
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Jun;28(5):E298-303
pubmed: 23511642
Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):667-72
pubmed: 17088197
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Mar 1;37(5):E349-56
pubmed: 22020588
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Oct 15;30(20):2280-7
pubmed: 16227890
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Dec 15;30(24):2800-5
pubmed: 16371908
J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Dec;5(6):488-93
pubmed: 17176011
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jul 1;25(13):1655-67
pubmed: 10870141