Key measurement concepts and appropriate clinical outcome assessments in pediatric achondroplasia clinical trials.
Achondroplasia
Clinical outcome assessment
Functioning
Patient-reported outcome
Pediatric
Qualitative
Journal
Orphanet journal of rare diseases
ISSN: 1750-1172
Titre abrégé: Orphanet J Rare Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101266602
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 05 2022
07 05 2022
Historique:
received:
23
07
2021
accepted:
26
04
2022
entrez:
7
5
2022
pubmed:
8
5
2022
medline:
11
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to identify fit-for-purpose clinical outcome assessments (COAs) to evaluate physical function, as well as social and emotional well-being in clinical trials enrolling a pediatric population with achondroplasia. Qualitative interviews lasting up to 90 min were conducted in the US with children/adolescents with achondroplasia and/or their caregivers. Interviews utilized concept elicitation methodology to explore experiences and priorities for treatment outcomes. Cognitive debriefing methodology explored relevance and understanding of selected COAs. Interviews (N = 36) were conducted with caregivers of children age 0-2 years (n = 8) and 3-7 years (n = 7) and child/caregiver dyads with children age 8-11 years (n = 15) and 12-17 years (n = 6). Children/caregivers identified pain, short stature, impacts on physical functioning, and impacts on well-being (e.g. negative attention/comments) as key bothersome aspects of achondroplasia. Caregivers considered an increase in height (n = 9/14, 64%) and an improvement in limb proportion (n = 11/14, 71%) as successful treatment outcomes. The Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth (QoLISSY-Brief) were cognitively debriefed. CHAQ items evaluating activities, reaching, and hygiene were most relevant. QoLISSY-Brief items evaluating reaching, height bother, being treated differently, and height preventing doing things others could were most relevant. The CHAQ and QoLISSY-Brief instructions, item wording, response scales/options and recall period were well understood by caregivers and adolescents age 12-17. Some children aged 8-11 had difficulty reading, understanding, or required caregiver input. Feedback informed minor amendments to the CHAQ and the addition of a 7-day recall period to the QoLISSY-Brief. These amendments were subsequently reviewed and confirmed in N = 12 interviews with caregivers of children age 0-11 (n = 9) and adolescents age 12-17 (n = 3). Achondroplasia impacts physical functioning and emotional/social well-being. An increase in height and improvement in limb proportion are considered to be important treatment outcomes, but children/adolescents and their caregivers expect that a successful treatment should also improve important functional outcomes such as reach. The CHAQ (adapted for achondroplasia) and QoLISSY-Brief are relevant and appropriate measures of physical function and emotional/social well-being for pediatric achondroplasia trials; patient-report is recommended for age 12-17 years and caregiver-report is recommended for age 0-11 years.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to identify fit-for-purpose clinical outcome assessments (COAs) to evaluate physical function, as well as social and emotional well-being in clinical trials enrolling a pediatric population with achondroplasia. Qualitative interviews lasting up to 90 min were conducted in the US with children/adolescents with achondroplasia and/or their caregivers. Interviews utilized concept elicitation methodology to explore experiences and priorities for treatment outcomes. Cognitive debriefing methodology explored relevance and understanding of selected COAs.
RESULTS
Interviews (N = 36) were conducted with caregivers of children age 0-2 years (n = 8) and 3-7 years (n = 7) and child/caregiver dyads with children age 8-11 years (n = 15) and 12-17 years (n = 6). Children/caregivers identified pain, short stature, impacts on physical functioning, and impacts on well-being (e.g. negative attention/comments) as key bothersome aspects of achondroplasia. Caregivers considered an increase in height (n = 9/14, 64%) and an improvement in limb proportion (n = 11/14, 71%) as successful treatment outcomes. The Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth (QoLISSY-Brief) were cognitively debriefed. CHAQ items evaluating activities, reaching, and hygiene were most relevant. QoLISSY-Brief items evaluating reaching, height bother, being treated differently, and height preventing doing things others could were most relevant. The CHAQ and QoLISSY-Brief instructions, item wording, response scales/options and recall period were well understood by caregivers and adolescents age 12-17. Some children aged 8-11 had difficulty reading, understanding, or required caregiver input. Feedback informed minor amendments to the CHAQ and the addition of a 7-day recall period to the QoLISSY-Brief. These amendments were subsequently reviewed and confirmed in N = 12 interviews with caregivers of children age 0-11 (n = 9) and adolescents age 12-17 (n = 3).
CONCLUSIONS
Achondroplasia impacts physical functioning and emotional/social well-being. An increase in height and improvement in limb proportion are considered to be important treatment outcomes, but children/adolescents and their caregivers expect that a successful treatment should also improve important functional outcomes such as reach. The CHAQ (adapted for achondroplasia) and QoLISSY-Brief are relevant and appropriate measures of physical function and emotional/social well-being for pediatric achondroplasia trials; patient-report is recommended for age 12-17 years and caregiver-report is recommended for age 0-11 years.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35525989
doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02333-6
pii: 10.1186/s13023-022-02333-6
pmc: PMC9077640
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
182Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Dec;37(12):1761-9
pubmed: 7986222
Trials. 2016 Sep 13;17(1):449
pubmed: 27618914
Bone. 2021 May;146:115872
pubmed: 33545406
Am J Med Genet A. 2017 Apr;173(4):868-878
pubmed: 28239978
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2005 Jul;14(4):245-9
pubmed: 15931026
Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2017 Nov;15(Suppl 1):109-118
pubmed: 29292874
Dev Dyn. 2017 Apr;246(4):291-309
pubmed: 27987249
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Jan 3;14(1):1
pubmed: 30606190
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S371-82
pubmed: 22588758
Qual Life Res. 2019 Sep;28(9):2553-2563
pubmed: 31093848
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Mar;133(3):237-44
pubmed: 17372080
Br J Health Psychol. 2005 Feb;10(Pt 1):101-14
pubmed: 15826337
Lancet. 2007 Jul 14;370(9582):162-172
pubmed: 17630040
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jul;41(15):1815-1825
pubmed: 29516753
J Neurosurg. 2006 Mar;104(3 Suppl):166-72
pubmed: 16572633
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Dec;39(24):2499-2503
pubmed: 27636099
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012 Jun;54(6):532-7
pubmed: 22409389
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):978-88
pubmed: 22152166
Qual Life Res. 1998 Jul;7(5):447-55
pubmed: 9691724
J Med Genet. 1998 Sep;35(9):705-12
pubmed: 9733026
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011 Oct;53(10):944-50
pubmed: 21838822
Am J Med Genet A. 2018 Apr;176(4):896-906
pubmed: 29424094
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(12):982-7
pubmed: 22112021
Patient. 2013;6(3):143-59
pubmed: 23912695