Implementation of maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) in humanitarian settings: insights and experiences of humanitarian health practitioners and global technical expert meeting attendees.
Humanitarian
Maternal
Mortality
Perinatal
Response
Review
Surveillance
Journal
Conflict and health
ISSN: 1752-1505
Titre abrégé: Confl Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101286573
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 May 2022
07 May 2022
Historique:
received:
01
09
2021
accepted:
03
02
2022
entrez:
7
5
2022
pubmed:
8
5
2022
medline:
8
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) is a system of identifying, analysing and learning lessons from such deaths in order to respond and prevent future deaths, and has been recommended by WHO and implemented in many low-and-middle income settings in recent years. However, there is limited documentation of experience with MPDSR in humanitarian settings. A meeting on MPDSR in humanitarian settings was convened by WHO, UNICEF, CDC and Save the Children, UNFPA and UNHCR on 17th-18th October 2019, informed by semi-structured interviews with a range of professionals, including expert attendees. Interviewees revealed significant obstacles to full implementation of the MPDSR process in humanitarian settings. Many obstacles were familiar to low resource settings in general but were amplified in the context of a humanitarian crisis, such as overburdened services, disincentives to reporting, accountability gaps, a blame approach, and politicisation of mortality. Factors more unique to humanitarian contexts included concerns about health worker security and moral distress. There are varying levels of institutionalisation and implementation capacity for MPDSR within humanitarian organisations. It is suggested that if poorly implemented, particularly with a punitive or blame approach, MPDSR may be counterproductive. Nevertheless, successes in MPDSR were described whereby the process led to concrete actions to prevent deaths, and where death reviews have led to improved understanding of complex and rectifiable contextual factors leading to deaths in humanitarian settings. Despite the challenges, examples exist where the lessons learnt from MPDSR processes have led to improved access and quality of care in humanitarian contexts, including successful advocacy. An adapted approach is required to ensure feasibility, with varying implementation being possible in different phases of crises. There is a need for guidance on MPDSR in humanitarian contexts, and for greater documentation and learning from experiences.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) is a system of identifying, analysing and learning lessons from such deaths in order to respond and prevent future deaths, and has been recommended by WHO and implemented in many low-and-middle income settings in recent years. However, there is limited documentation of experience with MPDSR in humanitarian settings. A meeting on MPDSR in humanitarian settings was convened by WHO, UNICEF, CDC and Save the Children, UNFPA and UNHCR on 17th-18th October 2019, informed by semi-structured interviews with a range of professionals, including expert attendees.
CONSULTATION FINDINGS
UNASSIGNED
Interviewees revealed significant obstacles to full implementation of the MPDSR process in humanitarian settings. Many obstacles were familiar to low resource settings in general but were amplified in the context of a humanitarian crisis, such as overburdened services, disincentives to reporting, accountability gaps, a blame approach, and politicisation of mortality. Factors more unique to humanitarian contexts included concerns about health worker security and moral distress. There are varying levels of institutionalisation and implementation capacity for MPDSR within humanitarian organisations. It is suggested that if poorly implemented, particularly with a punitive or blame approach, MPDSR may be counterproductive. Nevertheless, successes in MPDSR were described whereby the process led to concrete actions to prevent deaths, and where death reviews have led to improved understanding of complex and rectifiable contextual factors leading to deaths in humanitarian settings.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the challenges, examples exist where the lessons learnt from MPDSR processes have led to improved access and quality of care in humanitarian contexts, including successful advocacy. An adapted approach is required to ensure feasibility, with varying implementation being possible in different phases of crises. There is a need for guidance on MPDSR in humanitarian contexts, and for greater documentation and learning from experiences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35526012
doi: 10.1186/s13031-022-00440-6
pii: 10.1186/s13031-022-00440-6
pmc: PMC9077967
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
23Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : T32 HD098057
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Apr;105(1):82-5
pubmed: 19232603
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 May;5(5):
pubmed: 32371572
Lancet. 2017 Nov 18;390(10109):2287-2296
pubmed: 28602563
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Feb 1;94(2):86-91
pubmed: 26908958
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Jun 1;93(6):424-8
pubmed: 26240464
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Oct;107 Suppl 1:S113-21, S121-2
pubmed: 19815206
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 17;17(1):233
pubmed: 28716124
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jun 24;4(Suppl 4):e001300
pubmed: 31297253
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 May;5(5):e545-e555
pubmed: 28395847
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15 Suppl 2:S9
pubmed: 26391558
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017 Sep 28;5(3):333-337
pubmed: 28963168
Lancet. 2013 Jul 13;382(9887):146-57
pubmed: 23721752
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Dec;38(4):205-13
pubmed: 23318170
J Trop Pediatr. 2017 Jun 1;63(3):189-195
pubmed: 27789662
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 May 16;17(1):145
pubmed: 28511722
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019 May;27(2):1610275
pubmed: 31533592
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;239:112526
pubmed: 31520880
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Sep 29;16(1):291
pubmed: 27687243
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1993;36(4):239-43
pubmed: 8300010
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Dec 16;11:102
pubmed: 22171988
Public Health Action. 2017 Jun 21;7(2):168-174
pubmed: 28695092
Confl Health. 2009 Sep 10;3:8
pubmed: 19744319
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 May 03;3(3):e000640
pubmed: 29736275
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 19;14(9):e0222583
pubmed: 31536573
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 25;3:CD012982
pubmed: 32212268
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Aug;126(2):111-4
pubmed: 24834852
East Mediterr Health J. 2015 Feb 02;20(12):789-95
pubmed: 25664517
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 22;21(1):390
pubmed: 33618684
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Feb 1;35(1):78-90
pubmed: 31697378
Confl Health. 2014 May 20;8:8
pubmed: 24959198
PLoS Med. 2008 Jul 1;5(7):e146
pubmed: 18597552
Lancet Planet Health. 2020 Oct;4(10):e483-e495
pubmed: 33038321
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Nov 1;32(suppl_3):iii32-iii39
pubmed: 29149310
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Dec 1;33(10):1107-1117
pubmed: 30534942