Rebuilding child health in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC): evaluating the Asili social enterprise program.
Armed conflict
Child health
Democratic Republic of Congo
Market segmentation
Social enterprise
Journal
Conflict and health
ISSN: 1752-1505
Titre abrégé: Confl Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101286573
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 May 2022
07 May 2022
Historique:
received:
22
06
2021
accepted:
20
04
2022
entrez:
7
5
2022
pubmed:
8
5
2022
medline:
8
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has a long history of conflict and ongoing local instability; the eastern provinces, including South Kivu, have been especially affected. Health systems and livelihoods have been undermined, contributing to massive inequities in access to health services and high rates of internal displacement. Asili, an innovative social enterprise program, aimed to provide essential community services and improve the health of under-five children in two South Kivu communities, Mudaka and Panzi, via provision of small-format, franchisable health clinics and clean water services. We evaluated utilization and acceptance of Asili services in two study sites, Mudaka and Panzi. Data collected included questions on housing conditions, food security, and at follow up, Asili membership and use, satisfaction with services, and recommendations for improvement. Structured pre- and post-interviews with primary caregivers of families with under-five children were the primary source of data with additional community input collected through focus group discussions. At baseline, we enrolled 843 households in Mudaka and 890 in Panzi. Market segmentation analysis illuminated service usage patterns, showing Asili services were well received overall in both Mudaka and Panzi. Families reporting higher levels of proxy measures of socioeconomic status (SES), such as electricity, land ownership, and education, were more likely to use Asili services, findings that were further supported by focus group discussions among community members. Rebuilding health infrastructure in post-conflict settings, especially those that continue to be conflict-affected and very low SES, is a challenging prospect. Focus group results for this study highlighted the positive community response to Asili, while also underscoring challenges related to cost of services. Programs may need, in particular, to have different levels of costs for different SES groups. Additionally, longer follow-up periods and increased stability may be needed to assess the potential of social enterprise interventions such as Asili to improve health outcomes, especially in children. Institutional Review Board approval for this study was obtained at Stanford University (IRB 35216) and the University of Kinshasa, DRC. Further, this study has been registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (record NCT03536286), retrospectively registered as of 4/23/2018.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has a long history of conflict and ongoing local instability; the eastern provinces, including South Kivu, have been especially affected. Health systems and livelihoods have been undermined, contributing to massive inequities in access to health services and high rates of internal displacement. Asili, an innovative social enterprise program, aimed to provide essential community services and improve the health of under-five children in two South Kivu communities, Mudaka and Panzi, via provision of small-format, franchisable health clinics and clean water services.
METHODS
METHODS
We evaluated utilization and acceptance of Asili services in two study sites, Mudaka and Panzi. Data collected included questions on housing conditions, food security, and at follow up, Asili membership and use, satisfaction with services, and recommendations for improvement. Structured pre- and post-interviews with primary caregivers of families with under-five children were the primary source of data with additional community input collected through focus group discussions.
RESULTS
RESULTS
At baseline, we enrolled 843 households in Mudaka and 890 in Panzi. Market segmentation analysis illuminated service usage patterns, showing Asili services were well received overall in both Mudaka and Panzi. Families reporting higher levels of proxy measures of socioeconomic status (SES), such as electricity, land ownership, and education, were more likely to use Asili services, findings that were further supported by focus group discussions among community members.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Rebuilding health infrastructure in post-conflict settings, especially those that continue to be conflict-affected and very low SES, is a challenging prospect. Focus group results for this study highlighted the positive community response to Asili, while also underscoring challenges related to cost of services. Programs may need, in particular, to have different levels of costs for different SES groups. Additionally, longer follow-up periods and increased stability may be needed to assess the potential of social enterprise interventions such as Asili to improve health outcomes, especially in children.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Institutional Review Board approval for this study was obtained at Stanford University (IRB 35216) and the University of Kinshasa, DRC. Further, this study has been registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (record NCT03536286), retrospectively registered as of 4/23/2018.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35526031
doi: 10.1186/s13031-022-00454-0
pii: 10.1186/s13031-022-00454-0
pmc: PMC9077969
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03536286']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
21Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Mar;200:211-217
pubmed: 29421468
J Health Popul Nutr. 2013 Mar;31(1):118-29
pubmed: 23617212
BMJ Open. 2012 Jul 10;2(4):
pubmed: 22786948
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Feb 14;13(1):e17
pubmed: 21320854
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Mar 27;14:32
pubmed: 25889973
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(8):2242-54
pubmed: 16790308
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208
pubmed: 31078660
Soc Sci Med. 1996 Apr;42(7):1095-108
pubmed: 8730915
Disasters. 2011 Oct;35(4):639-60
pubmed: 21913929
Health Educ Q. 1988 Fall;15(3):299-315
pubmed: 3056876
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Mt Sinai J Med. 2011 May-Jun;78(3):419-35
pubmed: 21598268
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Feb;61(3):244-60
pubmed: 18197860
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jan;70(1):89-97
pubmed: 19850390
J Biosoc Sci. 2012 Nov;44(6):733-47
pubmed: 22377424
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Dec;123:182-93
pubmed: 25037852
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2007 Oct-Dec;22(4):319-36
pubmed: 17624880
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Oct;64:98-104
pubmed: 28011094
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Apr;106:35-42
pubmed: 24530615