Comparative efficacy of BG-Sentinel 2 and CDC-like mosquito traps for monitoring potential malaria vectors in Europe.
Anopheles daciae
Anopheles maculipennis sensu stricto
Anopheles messeae
BG-Sentinel trap
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention light trap
Italy
Journal
Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 May 2022
07 May 2022
Historique:
received:
12
01
2022
accepted:
11
04
2022
entrez:
7
5
2022
pubmed:
8
5
2022
medline:
11
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Different trapping devices and attractants are used in the mosquito surveillance programs currently running in Europe. Most of these devices target vector species belonging to the genera Culex or Aedes, and no studies have yet evaluated the effectiveness of different trapping devices for the specific targeting of Anopheles mosquito species, which are potential vectors of malaria in Europe. This study aims to fill this gap in knowledge by comparing the performance of trapping methods that are commonly used in European mosquito surveillance programs for Culex and Aedes for the specific collection of adults of species of the Anopheles maculipennis complex. The following combinations of traps and attractants were used: (i) BG-Sentinel 2 (BG trap) baited with a BG-Lure cartridge (BG + lure), (ii) BG trap baited with a BG-Lure cartridge and CO Forty-eight collections were performed on 12 different trapping days at each site, and a total of 1721 An. maculipennis complex specimens were captured. The molecular analysis of a sub-sample comprising 254 specimens identified both Anopheles messeae/Anopheles daciae (n = 103) and Anopheles maculipennis sensu stricto (n = 8) at site 1, while at site 2 only An. messeae/An. daciae (n = 143) was found. The four trapping devices differed with respect to the number of An. messeae/An. daciae captured. More mosquitoes were caught by the BG trap when it was used with additional lures (i.e. BG + lure + CO Our results show that both the BG-Sentinel and CDC trap can be used to effectively sample An. messeae/An. daciae, but that the combination of the BG-Sentinel trap with the BG-Lure and CO
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Different trapping devices and attractants are used in the mosquito surveillance programs currently running in Europe. Most of these devices target vector species belonging to the genera Culex or Aedes, and no studies have yet evaluated the effectiveness of different trapping devices for the specific targeting of Anopheles mosquito species, which are potential vectors of malaria in Europe. This study aims to fill this gap in knowledge by comparing the performance of trapping methods that are commonly used in European mosquito surveillance programs for Culex and Aedes for the specific collection of adults of species of the Anopheles maculipennis complex.
METHODS
METHODS
The following combinations of traps and attractants were used: (i) BG-Sentinel 2 (BG trap) baited with a BG-Lure cartridge (BG + lure), (ii) BG trap baited with a BG-Lure cartridge and CO
RESULTS
RESULTS
Forty-eight collections were performed on 12 different trapping days at each site, and a total of 1721 An. maculipennis complex specimens were captured. The molecular analysis of a sub-sample comprising 254 specimens identified both Anopheles messeae/Anopheles daciae (n = 103) and Anopheles maculipennis sensu stricto (n = 8) at site 1, while at site 2 only An. messeae/An. daciae (n = 143) was found. The four trapping devices differed with respect to the number of An. messeae/An. daciae captured. More mosquitoes were caught by the BG trap when it was used with additional lures (i.e. BG + lure + CO
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our results show that both the BG-Sentinel and CDC trap can be used to effectively sample An. messeae/An. daciae, but that the combination of the BG-Sentinel trap with the BG-Lure and CO
Identifiants
pubmed: 35526068
doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05285-9
pii: 10.1186/s13071-022-05285-9
pmc: PMC9077833
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carbon Dioxide
142M471B3J
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
160Subventions
Organisme : Regione del Veneto
ID : 184440
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2009 Dec;9(6):703-11
pubmed: 19485768
Bull Entomol Res. 2004 Dec;94(6):525-35
pubmed: 15541192
Malar J. 2012 Mar 30;11:98
pubmed: 22463387
Parasit Vectors. 2019 Jan 8;12(1):18
pubmed: 30621785
Genes (Basel). 2020 Feb 05;11(2):
pubmed: 32033356
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Apr;86(4):642-8
pubmed: 22492149
J Vector Ecol. 2012 Dec;37(2):269-75
pubmed: 23181848
J Med Entomol. 2002 Jul;39(4):621-30
pubmed: 12144293
Malar J. 2010 Aug 12;9:231
pubmed: 20704707
J Vector Ecol. 2012 Jun;37(1):117-23
pubmed: 22548545
Malar J. 2019 Dec 2;18(1):386
pubmed: 31791336
Insects. 2021 Jul 31;12(8):
pubmed: 34442258
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 18;12(10):e0186696
pubmed: 29045484
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2017 Mar;33(1):71-74
pubmed: 28388325
Methods Mol Biol. 2019;2013:233-285
pubmed: 31267506
Malar J. 2015 Dec 15;14:502
pubmed: 26670881
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Aug 7;10(1):378
pubmed: 28784149
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):857
pubmed: 32503526
Parassitologia. 1998 Dec;40(4):431-7
pubmed: 10645555
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 6;9(1):11412
pubmed: 31388090
Med Vet Entomol. 2016 Jun;30(2):144-54
pubmed: 26787387
Parasit Vectors. 2010 Dec 03;3:117
pubmed: 21129198
J Chem Ecol. 2015 Jun;41(6):567-73
pubmed: 26026743
Malar J. 2019 Sep 2;18(1):299
pubmed: 31477123
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2016 Dec;32(4):282-291
pubmed: 28206863
Parasit Vectors. 2022 Mar 15;15(1):88
pubmed: 35292106
Environ Res. 2020 Dec;191:110038
pubmed: 32810503
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2015 Sep;31(3):248-57
pubmed: 26375906
Malar J. 2015 Apr 15;14:161
pubmed: 25888896
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2013 Sep;108(6):763-71
pubmed: 24037199
Parasit Vectors. 2020 May 29;13(1):271
pubmed: 32471479
Med Vet Entomol. 1995 Oct;9(4):377-80
pubmed: 8541587
Parasit Vectors. 2014 Dec 11;7:580
pubmed: 25499569
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2006 Jun;22(2):229-38
pubmed: 17019768
Malar J. 2014 Mar 21;13:111
pubmed: 24656206
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2006 Sep;22(3):490-6
pubmed: 17067051
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014 Aug;109(5):685-705
pubmed: 25185008
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 19;11(1):6421
pubmed: 33742019
Euro Surveill. 2011 Oct 20;16(42):
pubmed: 22027375
Parasit Vectors. 2014 Jun 12;7:268
pubmed: 24924481