Aortic valve leaflet and root dimensions in normal tricuspid aortic valves: A computed tomography study.
3D modelling
aortic valve anatomy
aortic valve repair
computed tomography
Journal
Journal of cardiac surgery
ISSN: 1540-8191
Titre abrégé: J Card Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8908809
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
revised:
06
03
2022
received:
30
01
2022
accepted:
06
04
2022
pubmed:
9
5
2022
medline:
6
7
2022
entrez:
8
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to use coronary computed tomography in patients with normal tricuspid aortic valves to perform detailed aortic root and aortic valve geometric analysis with a focus on the asymmetry of the three leaflets. Retrospective analysis of anonymized coronary computed tomography angiograms was performed using dedicated software, where manual aortic root segmentation and marking of several points of interest were followed by automated measurements of aortic root and leaflets. Asymmetry of the three leaflets in individual patients was assessed by calculating absolute and relative differences between the largest and the smallest of the three leaflets. We analyzed 70 aortic valves, the mean patient age was 53 ± 11 years, and 50% (n = 35) of patients were female. All aortic valves were tricuspid, without calcifications and aortic roots were of normal dimensions. Some degree of asymmetry was present in all analyzed valves. Absolute and relative differences for free margin length were 3.2 ± 1.4 mm and 9.3 ± 3.8%, respectively. The largest relative difference was noted in the coaptation area (36.5 ± 16.5%) and the smallest in leaflet effective height (6.1 ± 4.8%). Using predefined cutoff criteria for absolute differences in leaflet dimensions, 86% of the valves were classified as asymmetric. Most normal tricuspid aortic valves show some degree of asymmetry. Equal free margin length of the three leaflets is not needed for normal tricuspid aortic valve function. Leaflet effective height showed the least amount of asymmetry confirming its importance in keeping the aortic valve competent.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY
The aim of this study was to use coronary computed tomography in patients with normal tricuspid aortic valves to perform detailed aortic root and aortic valve geometric analysis with a focus on the asymmetry of the three leaflets.
METHODS
Retrospective analysis of anonymized coronary computed tomography angiograms was performed using dedicated software, where manual aortic root segmentation and marking of several points of interest were followed by automated measurements of aortic root and leaflets. Asymmetry of the three leaflets in individual patients was assessed by calculating absolute and relative differences between the largest and the smallest of the three leaflets.
RESULTS
We analyzed 70 aortic valves, the mean patient age was 53 ± 11 years, and 50% (n = 35) of patients were female. All aortic valves were tricuspid, without calcifications and aortic roots were of normal dimensions. Some degree of asymmetry was present in all analyzed valves. Absolute and relative differences for free margin length were 3.2 ± 1.4 mm and 9.3 ± 3.8%, respectively. The largest relative difference was noted in the coaptation area (36.5 ± 16.5%) and the smallest in leaflet effective height (6.1 ± 4.8%). Using predefined cutoff criteria for absolute differences in leaflet dimensions, 86% of the valves were classified as asymmetric.
CONCLUSIONS
Most normal tricuspid aortic valves show some degree of asymmetry. Equal free margin length of the three leaflets is not needed for normal tricuspid aortic valve function. Leaflet effective height showed the least amount of asymmetry confirming its importance in keeping the aortic valve competent.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2350-2357Subventions
Organisme : University Medical Center Ljubljana
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Cardiac Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Takahashi D, Shiiya N, Washiyama N, Yamashita K. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement for a prolapsing asymmetric valve. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017;24(3):464-465.
Kunihara T, Aicher D, Rodionycheva S, et al. Preoperative aortic root geometry and postoperative cusp configuration primarily determine long-term outcome after valve-preserving aortic root repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(6):1389-1395.
Schafers HJ, Bierbach B, Aicher D. A new approach to the assessment of aortic cusp geometry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132(2):436-438.
Tretter JT, Mori S. Two-dimensional imaging of a complex three-dimensional structure: measurements of aortic root dimensions. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019;32(6):792-794.
Swanson M, Clark RE. Dimensions and geometric relationships of the human aortic valve as a function of pressure. Circ Res. 1974;35(6):871-882.
De Kerchove L, Momeni M, Aphram G, et al. Free margin length and coaptation surface area in normal tricuspid aortic valve: an anatomical study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53(5):1040-1048.
Schafers HJ, Schmied W, Marom G, Aicher D. Cusp height in aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146(2):269-274.
Izawa Y, Mori S, Tretter JT, et al. Normative aortic valvar measurements in adults using cardiac computed tomography-a potential guide to further sophisticate aortic valve-sparing surgery. Circ J. 2021;85(7):1059-1067.
Komiya T, Shimamoto T, Nonaka M, Matsuo T. Is small cusp size a limitation for aortic valve repair? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;56(3):497-502.
Tamer S, Mastrobuoni S, van Dyck M, et al. Free margin length and geometric height in aortic root dilatation and leaflet prolapse: implications for aortic valve repair surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;57(1):124-132.
Vollebergh FE, Becker AE. Minor congenital variations of cusp size in tricuspid aortic valves. Possible link with isolated aortic stenosis. Br Heart J. 1977;39(9):1006-1011.
Yang DH, Kim DH, Handschumacher MD, et al. In vivo assessment of aortic root geometry in normal controls using 3D analysis of computed tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(7):780-786.
Pisani G, Scaffa R, Ieropoli O, et al. Role of the sinuses of Valsalva on the opening of the aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(4):999-1003.
Kvitting JP, Ebbers T, Wigstrom L, Engvall J, Olin CL, Bolger AF. Flow patterns in the aortic root and the aorta studied with time-resolved, 3-dimensional, phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: implications for aortic valve-sparing surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127(6):1602-1607.
Thubrikar MJ, Nolan SP, Aouad J, Deck JD. Stress sharing between the sinus and leaflets of canine aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 1986;42(4):434-440.
Youssefi P, Zacek P, Debauchez M, Lansac E. Isolated tricuspid aortic valve repair with double annuloplasty: how I teach it. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;108(4):987-994.
Youssefi P, Zacek P, Debauchez M, Lansac E. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement using the remodeling technique with aortic annuloplasty: tricuspid valves with repair of specific lesion sets: how I teach it. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107(6):1592-1599.