The true costs of cesarean delivery for patients in rural Rwanda: Accounting for post-discharge expenses in estimated health expenditures.
Catastrophic health expenditure
Cesarean
Cost of post-operative care
Follow-up care
Health insurance
Healthcare access
Healthcare cost
Poverty
Rural
c-section
Journal
International journal for equity in health
ISSN: 1475-9276
Titre abrégé: Int J Equity Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147692
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 05 2022
08 05 2022
Historique:
received:
30
09
2021
accepted:
17
04
2022
entrez:
8
5
2022
pubmed:
9
5
2022
medline:
11
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
While it is recognized that there are costs associated with postoperative patient follow-up, risk assessments of catastrophic health expenditures (CHEs) due to surgery in sub-Saharan Africa rarely include expenses after discharge. We describe patient-level costs for cesarean section (c-section) and follow-up care up to postoperative day (POD) 30 and evaluate the contribution of follow-up to CHEs in rural Rwanda. We interviewed women who delivered via c-section at Kirehe District Hospital between September 2019 and February 2020. Expenditure details were captured on an adapted surgical indicator financial survey tool and extracted from the hospital billing system. CHE was defined as health expenditure of ≥ 10% of annual household expenditure. We report the cost of c-section up to 30 days after discharge, the rate of CHE among c-section patients stratified by in-hospital costs and post-discharge follow-up costs, and the main contributors to c-section follow-up costs. We performed a multivariate logistic regression using a backward stepwise process to determine independent predictors of CHE at POD30 at α ≤ 0.05. Of the 479 participants in this study, 90% were classified as impoverished before surgery and an additional 6.4% were impoverished by the c-section. The median out-of-pocket costs up to POD30 was US$122.16 (IQR: $102.94, $148.11); 63% of these expenditures were attributed to post-discharge expenses or lost opportunity costs (US$77.50; IQR: $67.70, $95.60). To afford c-section care, 64.4% borrowed money and 18.4% sold possessions. The CHE rate was 27% when only considering direct and indirect costs up to the time of discharge and 77% when including the reported expenses up to POD30. Transportation and lost household wages were the largest contributors to post-discharge costs. Further, CHE at POD30 was independently predicted by membership in community-based health insurance (aOR = 3.40, 95% CI: 1.21,9.60), being a farmer (aOR = 2.25, 95% CI:1.00,3.03), primary school education (aOR = 2.35, 95% CI:1.91,4.66), and small household sizes had 0.22 lower odds of experiencing CHE compared to large households (aOR = 0.78, 95% CI:0.66,0.91). Costs associated with surgical follow-up are often neglected in financial risk calculations but contribute significantly to the risk of CHE in rural Rwanda. Insurance coverage for direct medical costs is insufficient to protect against CHE. Innovative follow-up solutions to reduce costs of patient transport and compensate for household lost wages need to be considered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35527274
doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01664-x
pii: 10.1186/s12939-022-01664-x
pmc: PMC9080175
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
62Subventions
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R21TW011229.
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Lancet. 2015 Apr 27;385 Suppl 2:S50
pubmed: 26313100
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2011 May;29(5):303-8
pubmed: 21709933
J Environ Public Health. 2018 Dec 18;2018:2624591
pubmed: 30662470
Br J Surg. 2012 Mar;99(3):436-43
pubmed: 22237597
Arch Public Health. 2012 Jan 03;70(1):3
pubmed: 22958578
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jan 08;14:87-95
pubmed: 33447112
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 15;19(1):948
pubmed: 31307419
Afr J Emerg Med. 2020;10(Suppl 1):S2-S6
pubmed: 33318894
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2016 Jul 08;2:6
pubmed: 27398224
Disasters. 2013 Jul;37 Suppl 1:S105-20
pubmed: 23905763
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Oct;34(4):e1510-e1519
pubmed: 31270861
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 11;19(1):930
pubmed: 31296207
BMJ Open. 2018 May 8;8(5):e022214
pubmed: 29739786
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Mar 1;91(3):207-16
pubmed: 23476093
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Feb;6(2):e169-e179
pubmed: 29248367
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Apr;40(3):342-348
pubmed: 31353990
World J Surg. 2018 Jun;42(6):1603-1609
pubmed: 29143091
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;131(1):30-4
pubmed: 26115791
BMJ. 2018 Jan 24;360:k55
pubmed: 29367432
Int Health. 2021 Dec 1;13(6):598-605
pubmed: 32175562
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Nov 22;11:683-690
pubmed: 30538489
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Sep 14;37:55
pubmed: 33209182
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Apr 27;3 Suppl 2:S21-7
pubmed: 25926317
World J Surg. 2017 Jun;41(6):1401-1413
pubmed: 28105528
Matern Child Health J. 2019 May;23(5):613-622
pubmed: 30600515
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 29;14(8):e0221778
pubmed: 31465505
Lancet. 2003 Jul 12;362(9378):111-7
pubmed: 12867110
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Aug;19(8):1734-43
pubmed: 25874875