Anatomy and Topography of Coronary Sinus and Mitral Valve Annulus in Functional Mitral Regurgitation.

CT-angiography coronary sinus functional mitral valve regurgitation indirect mitral valve annuloplasty mitral valve annulus

Journal

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
ISSN: 2297-055X
Titre abrégé: Front Cardiovasc Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101653388

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 02 02 2022
accepted: 14 03 2022
entrez: 9 5 2022
pubmed: 10 5 2022
medline: 10 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We aimed to investigate the anatomical relationship of the coronary sinus (CS) and the mitral valve annulus (MVA) in patients with or without functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) using a multislice CT (MSCT) software to determine (a) the distance and angle of both CS and MVA plane and (b) the mitral annulus geometry. A total of 215 patients with MSCT and CS to MVA topography evaluation were enrolled in this retrospective study. This patient cohort included 145 patients without FMR (67.4%, FMR ≤ 1+) and 70 patients (32.6%) with clinically relevant FMR (FMR ≥ 2+). Distance and angulation of CS to MVA planes were highly variable. In all groups, no significant correlation was documented between the distance or angle of CS to MVA planes and left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, or left atrial volume. A significant increase in total CS length could be found in patients with FMR ≥ 2+ compared to the FMR ≤ 1+ group. MVA diameter, area, and perimeter were significantly increased in FMR ≥ 2+ compared to FMR ≤ 1+. In the FMR ≥ 2+ cohort 61% showed a distance of CS to MVA plane <7.8 mm and 58% revealed an angle of CS to MVA plane <14.2°. Distance and angulation of CS to MVA topography using an MSCT approach are similar between patients with or without FMR, while CS length, MVA area, MVA perimeter, anterior-posterior diameter, and intercommissural diameter are significantly increased in all FMR subgroups. However, ~60% of FMR ≥ 2+ patients showed favorable CS to MVA topography for indirect mitral annuloplasty.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
We aimed to investigate the anatomical relationship of the coronary sinus (CS) and the mitral valve annulus (MVA) in patients with or without functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) using a multislice CT (MSCT) software to determine (a) the distance and angle of both CS and MVA plane and (b) the mitral annulus geometry.
Methods UNASSIGNED
A total of 215 patients with MSCT and CS to MVA topography evaluation were enrolled in this retrospective study.
Results UNASSIGNED
This patient cohort included 145 patients without FMR (67.4%, FMR ≤ 1+) and 70 patients (32.6%) with clinically relevant FMR (FMR ≥ 2+). Distance and angulation of CS to MVA planes were highly variable. In all groups, no significant correlation was documented between the distance or angle of CS to MVA planes and left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, or left atrial volume. A significant increase in total CS length could be found in patients with FMR ≥ 2+ compared to the FMR ≤ 1+ group. MVA diameter, area, and perimeter were significantly increased in FMR ≥ 2+ compared to FMR ≤ 1+. In the FMR ≥ 2+ cohort 61% showed a distance of CS to MVA plane <7.8 mm and 58% revealed an angle of CS to MVA plane <14.2°.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Distance and angulation of CS to MVA topography using an MSCT approach are similar between patients with or without FMR, while CS length, MVA area, MVA perimeter, anterior-posterior diameter, and intercommissural diameter are significantly increased in all FMR subgroups. However, ~60% of FMR ≥ 2+ patients showed favorable CS to MVA topography for indirect mitral annuloplasty.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35528836
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.868562
pmc: PMC9072628
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

868562

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Rottländer, Saal, Ögütcü, Degen and Haude.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

HD is a consultant for Biotronik and Cardiac Dimensions. MH is a consultant for Biotronik, Orbus Neich, Robocath and Cardiac Dimensions. He received institutional grants and lecture fees from Biotronik, Cardiac Dimensions, Orbus Neich, SMT and Philips. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

EuroIntervention. 2019 Nov 20;15(10):923-926
pubmed: 31270035
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Nov 21;48(10):1938-45
pubmed: 17112981
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 15;97(3):495-502
pubmed: 32602976
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003 Jul;16(7):777-802
pubmed: 12835667
Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Aug;14(8):931-8
pubmed: 22613584
Am Heart J. 1998 Jan;135(1):93-8
pubmed: 9453527
Circulation. 2007 Mar 20;115(11):1426-32
pubmed: 17353434
Circulation. 2009 Jul 28;120(4):326-33
pubmed: 19597051
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010 May;11(4):307-32
pubmed: 20435783
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Nov - Dec;10(6):435-449
pubmed: 27780758
Open Heart. 2016 Jul 08;3(2):e000411
pubmed: 27493761
EuroIntervention. 2021 Jan 20;16(13):1106-1113
pubmed: 32718911
Circulation. 2006 Aug 1;114(5):377-80
pubmed: 16864726
Europace. 2005 Sep;7(5):475-81
pubmed: 16087113
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Mar;9(3):269-80
pubmed: 26897676
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Nov;7(11):945-955
pubmed: 31521683

Auteurs

Dennis Rottländer (D)

Department of Cardiology, Rheinlandklinikum Neuss, Neuss, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Krankenhaus Porz am Rhein, Cologne, Germany.

Martin Saal (M)

Department of Cardiology, Rheinlandklinikum Neuss, Neuss, Germany.

Alev Ögütcü (A)

Department of Cardiology, Rheinlandklinikum Neuss, Neuss, Germany.

Hubertus Degen (H)

Department of Cardiology, Rheinlandklinikum Neuss, Neuss, Germany.

Michael Haude (M)

Department of Cardiology, Rheinlandklinikum Neuss, Neuss, Germany.

Classifications MeSH