Factors associated with the quality of work life among working breast cancer survivors.
Cancer survivors
Distress
Quality of work life
Return to work
Spiritual well-being
Journal
Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing
ISSN: 2347-5625
Titre abrégé: Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101673157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
12
07
2021
accepted:
28
11
2021
entrez:
9
5
2022
pubmed:
10
5
2022
medline:
10
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In South Korea, the incidence and survival rate of breast cancer are high, and the return-to-work rate of breast cancer survivors continues to increase. However, there are various obstacles after returning to work, which can negatively affect long-term quality of life management. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify factors associated with the quality of work life, which is a priority factor in managing the quality of life. Data were collected from 169 female breast cancer survivors and participants were selected from three different hospitals in the metropolitan city and snowball sampling was used in conjunction. The participants filled out questionnaires about a variety of factors that may associated with quality of work life (QWL); the data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, All participants were women with an average age of 48.9 years after diagnosis of cancer, with 65.7% married. 46.2% of them were in Cancer stage 1, 65.7% had work experience over six years, and most of them were educated managerial workers, fixed duty. Multiple regression analysis indicated perceived health status, social support of superior and colleagues and spiritual well-being were positive predictors and cancer fatigue and distress were negative predictors of QWL, explaining 49.5% (adjusted For increasing the QWL of working breast cancer survivors, decreasing cancer fatigue and distress and increasing perceived health status, social support, and spiritual wellbeing can be considered. The findings can contribute for developing effective and systematic interventions that consider the identified predictors to enhance the QWL and successful returning to work and job retaining.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35529416
doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2021.11.005
pii: S2347-5625(21)00007-X
pmc: PMC9072182
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
97-104Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Author.
Références
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2021 Feb;15(1):37-46
pubmed: 33253927
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997 Feb;13(2):63-74
pubmed: 9095563
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2014 Feb;44(1):108-17
pubmed: 24637291
Psychosomatics. 2001 Mar-Apr;42(2):117-23
pubmed: 11239124
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2015 Dec;45(6):879-89
pubmed: 26805500
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Mar 15;34(11):e98
pubmed: 30914908
Oncologist. 2000;5(5):353-60
pubmed: 11040270
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Nov;27(6):e12919
pubmed: 30253019
Psychooncology. 2008 Feb;17(2):161-9
pubmed: 17506077
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 19;17(17):
pubmed: 32824940
J Gerontol. 1982 Jan;37(1):91-9
pubmed: 7053405
Support Care Cancer. 2017 May;25(5):1475-1484
pubmed: 28019005
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Dec 21;56(12):
pubmed: 33371370
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 10;18(1):66
pubmed: 29321006
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Sep;20(9):2149-56
pubmed: 22086407
Oncology (Williston Park). 1998 Nov;12(11A):369-77
pubmed: 10028520
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10;26(8):1302-9
pubmed: 18323554
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Jan;88(1):79-90
pubmed: 15631576
Cancer. 2006 Feb 15;106(4):751-8
pubmed: 16400678
Sleep Med Clin. 2008 Mar;3(1):61-71
pubmed: 18769530