Understanding Design Features of Music and Language: The Choric/Dialogic Distinction.
animal communication
choric
dialogic
information theory
language
music
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
30
09
2021
accepted:
22
02
2022
entrez:
9
5
2022
pubmed:
10
5
2022
medline:
10
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Music and spoken language share certain characteristics: both consist of sequences of acoustic elements that are combinatorically combined, and these elements partition the same continuous acoustic dimensions (frequency, formant space and duration). However, the resulting categories differ sharply: scale tones and note durations of small integer ratios appear in music, while speech uses phonemes, lexical tone, and non-isochronous durations. Why did music and language diverge into the two systems we have today, differing in these specific features? We propose a framework based on information theory and a reverse-engineering perspective, suggesting that design features of music and language are a response to their differential deployment along three different continuous dimensions. These include the familiar propositional-aesthetic ('goal') and repetitive-novel ('novelty') dimensions, and a dialogic-choric ('interactivity') dimension that is our focus here. Specifically, we hypothesize that music exhibits specializations enhancing coherent production by several individuals concurrently-the 'choric' context. In contrast, language is specialized for exchange in tightly coordinated turn-taking-'dialogic' contexts. We examine the evidence for our framework, both from humans and non-human animals, and conclude that many proposed design features of music and language follow naturally from their use in distinct dialogic and choric communicative contexts. Furthermore, the hybrid nature of intermediate systems like poetry, chant, or solo lament follows from their deployment in the less typical interactive context.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35529579
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.786899
pmc: PMC9075586
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
786899Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Haiduk and Fitch.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 12;6:284
pubmed: 25814976
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Apr 05;11:168
pubmed: 28424603
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 26;116(9):3793-3798
pubmed: 30670642
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Aug;23(8):639-652
pubmed: 31235320
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 12;6:731
pubmed: 26124727
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Mar;91(3):1707-17
pubmed: 1564206
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jun 13;285(1880):
pubmed: 29875303
Mem Cognit. 2012 May;40(4):567-78
pubmed: 22271265
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019 Oct;1453(1):12-21
pubmed: 31515817
Cognition. 2006 May;100(1):173-215
pubmed: 16412411
Cognition. 2018 Jun;175:77-95
pubmed: 29477750
Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 10;5:1118
pubmed: 25346705
Brain Cogn. 2017 Mar;112:3-12
pubmed: 26905647
Eur J Neurosci. 2015 Mar;41(5):641-64
pubmed: 25728182
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 19;370(1664):20140097
pubmed: 25646520
Cognition. 2012 Mar;122(3):280-91
pubmed: 22192697
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2022 Jul 8;45:295-316
pubmed: 35316612
Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Oct;4(4):625-52
pubmed: 22847872
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;1(2):353-67
pubmed: 25164938
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;23(1):63-77
pubmed: 30471869
Anim Behav. 1999 Oct;58(4):825-830
pubmed: 10512656
Science. 1961 May 26;133(3465):1689-93
pubmed: 13762154
Cortex. 2011 Oct;47(9):1091-8
pubmed: 21621766
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(1):32-59
pubmed: 27135040
Dev Psychol. 2020 May;56(5):861-868
pubmed: 32162936
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Mar 15;:
pubmed: 29542134
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 Feb;77(1):57-76
pubmed: 11911374
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 06;11:593671
pubmed: 33240183
J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Mar;11(2):194-205
pubmed: 10198134
Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Aug 26;44:e60
pubmed: 32843107
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 1;108(9):3526-9
pubmed: 21278332
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Jan;20(1):6-14
pubmed: 26651245
J Laryngol Otol. 1998 May;112(5):451-4
pubmed: 9747473
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 15;116(42):20813-20814
pubmed: 31537748
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1900-1908
pubmed: 28887798
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1169:256-65
pubmed: 19673789
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 19;370(1664):20140096
pubmed: 25646519
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2016 Mar;18(1):23-32
pubmed: 27069377
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Feb;11(2):127-38
pubmed: 20068583
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jul 21;112(29):8987-92
pubmed: 26124105
Curr Biol. 2019 Dec 2;29(23):4084-4092.e4
pubmed: 31708393
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):583-590
pubmed: 30238294
Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Aug 20;44:e59
pubmed: 32814608
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 14;118(37):
pubmed: 34504001
Infancy. 2005 Jan;7(1):53-71
pubmed: 33430544
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Oct;22(10):896-910
pubmed: 30266149
Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):313-8
pubmed: 23116925
Science. 1971 Aug 13;173(3997):585-97
pubmed: 17833100
Curr Biol. 2019 Oct 7;29(19):3229-3243.e12
pubmed: 31543451
Front Neuroinform. 2021 Jun 15;15:596443
pubmed: 34211385
Cerebrum. 2018 Nov 01;2018:
pubmed: 30746026
Curr Biol. 2018 Feb 5;28(3):356-368.e5
pubmed: 29395919
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Dec 19;369(1658):20130394
pubmed: 25385772
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 29;8(11):e80402
pubmed: 24312214
Curr Biol. 2017 May 22;27(10):R369-R371
pubmed: 28535383
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Nov 15;10:591
pubmed: 27895573
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Oct;19(10):555-557
pubmed: 26346993
Science. 2002 Mar 1;295(5560):1664-9
pubmed: 11872830
J Comp Neurol. 2011 Dec 15;519(18):3599-639
pubmed: 21800319
Lang Speech. 2004;47(Pt 1):31-56
pubmed: 15298329
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Dec;13(12):532-40
pubmed: 19828357
Psychol Sci. 2021 Sep;32(9):1416-1425
pubmed: 34409898
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Feb;83(2):164-75
pubmed: 22245599
Biosemiotics. 2015;8(1):29-46
pubmed: 26316900
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 28;6:1416
pubmed: 26441787
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 23;5:1052
pubmed: 25295018
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 May;23(5):389-407
pubmed: 31006626
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Feb;16(2):129-35
pubmed: 22209601
Sci Am. 1960 Sep;203:89-96
pubmed: 14402211
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2019 Jul;10(4):e1493
pubmed: 30724476
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 19;5:13220
pubmed: 26286236
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 02;6:89
pubmed: 25699004
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022 Apr;97(2):749-765
pubmed: 34873806
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11818-23
pubmed: 11573015
Nat Neurosci. 1998 Aug;1(4):304-9
pubmed: 10195164
Curr Biol. 2018 Nov 19;28(22):3661-3666.e3
pubmed: 30416063
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Sep 19;369(1651):20130302
pubmed: 25092670
Biol Cybern. 2011 Jul;105(1):55-70
pubmed: 21792610
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 18;7:1575
pubmed: 27803682
J Neurosci. 2017 May 3;37(18):4848-4858
pubmed: 28411271
Biol Lett. 2006 Mar 22;2(1):1-4
pubmed: 17148310
Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun 17;:
pubmed: 29911318
Neuron. 2010 May 27;66(4):610-8
pubmed: 20510864
Science. 1997 Mar 14;275(5306):1593-9
pubmed: 9054347
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Feb;19(2):86-91
pubmed: 25534332
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Feb;14(2):257-62
pubmed: 21217764
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jan 31;109:295-310
pubmed: 29269305
Science. 2019 Oct 4;366(6461):50-54
pubmed: 31604300
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Jun;147(6):888-904
pubmed: 29888940
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 05;5:12881
pubmed: 26242909
Cognition. 2019 Aug;189:23-34
pubmed: 30913527
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 29;9(1):5375
pubmed: 30926840
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Apr;129(4):2245-52
pubmed: 21476679
Ethology. 2019 Aug;125(8):503-515
pubmed: 31341343
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 13;4:841
pubmed: 24312065