Why inconsistency arguments fail: a response to Shaw.
Embryos
abortion
inconsistency arguments
prolife
Journal
The New bioethics : a multidisciplinary journal of biotechnology and the body
ISSN: 2050-2885
Titre abrégé: New Bioeth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101627814
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
10
5
2022
medline:
26
5
2022
entrez:
9
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Opponents of abortion are commonly said to be inconsistent in their beliefs or actions, and to fail in their obligations to prevent the deaths of embryos and fetuses from causes other than induced abortion. We have argued that these 'inconsistency arguments' conform to a pattern which is susceptible to a number of objections, and that consequently they fail
Identifiants
pubmed: 35531764
doi: 10.1080/20502877.2022.2070960
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM