Efficacy and Safety of Ultrahigh-Dose Methylcobalamin in Early-Stage Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Journal
JAMA neurology
ISSN: 2168-6157
Titre abrégé: JAMA Neurol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2022
01 06 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
10
5
2022
medline:
16
6
2022
entrez:
9
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The effectiveness of currently approved drugs for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is restricted; there is a need to develop further treatments. Initial studies have shown ultrahigh-dose methylcobalamin to be a promising agent. To validate the efficacy and safety of ultrahigh-dose methylcobalamin for patients with ALS enrolled within 1 year of onset. This was a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized phase 3 clinical trial with a 12-week observation and 16-week randomized period, conducted from October 17, 2017, to September 30, 2019. Patients were recruited from 25 neurology centers in Japan; those with ALS diagnosed within 1 year of onset by the updated Awaji criteria were initially enrolled. Of those, patients fulfilling the following criteria after 12-week observation were eligible for randomization: 1- or 2-point decrease in the Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) total score, a percent forced vital capacity greater than 60%, no history of noninvasive respiratory support and tracheostomy, and being ambulatory. The target participant number was 64 in both the methylcobalamin and placebo groups. Patients were randomly assigned through an electronic web-response system to methylcobalamin or placebo. Intramuscular injection of methylcobalamin (50-mg dose) or placebo twice weekly for 16 weeks. The primary end point was change in ALSFRS-R total score from baseline to week 16 in the full analysis set. A total of 130 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.0 [11.7] years; 74 men [56.9%]) were randomly assigned to methylcobalamin or placebo (65 each). A total of 129 patients were eligible for the full analysis set, and 126 completed the double-blind stage. Of these, 124 patients proceeded to the open-label extended period. The least square means difference in ALSFRS-R total score at week 16 of the randomized period was 1.97 points greater with methylcobalamin than placebo (-2.66 vs -4.63; 95% CI, 0.44-3.50; P = .01). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the 2 groups. Results of this randomized clinical trial showed that ultrahigh-dose methylcobalamin was efficacious in slowing functional decline in patients with early-stage ALS and with moderate progression rate and was safe to use during the 16-week treatment period. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03548311.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35532908
pii: 2792228
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0901
pmc: PMC9086935
doi:
Substances chimiques
mecobalamin
BR1SN1JS2W
Vitamin B 12
P6YC3EG204
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03548311']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
575-583Investigateurs
Yusuke Osaki
(Y)
Hiroki Yamazaki
(H)
Shotaro Haji
(S)
Yumi Ishida
(Y)
Akari Futami
(A)
Toshiko Miyamoto
(T)
Akiyo Akaishi
(A)
Kenshi Takechi
(K)
Kazuki Maeda
(K)
Shoko Kurisu
(S)
Mari Yoshizawa
(M)
Nozomu Matsuda
(N)
Tomoko Nakazato
(T)
Ryoichi Nakamura
(R)
Naoki Hayashi
(N)
Akihiro Kawata
(A)
Hideki Kimura
(H)
Kota Bokuda
(K)
Akiko Tamura
(A)
Chiho Ishida
(C)
Michi Kawamoto
(M)
Hyo Kim
(H)
Jun Kawamata
(J)
Shin Hisahara
(S)
Yuichi Kimura
(Y)
Toru Yamashita
(T)
Yasuyuki Ohta
(Y)
Kimihito Arai
(K)
Takahiro Takeda
(T)
Tomoo Ogawa
(T)
Shingo Ikari
(S)
Yasunori Ono
(Y)
Yukio Fujino
(Y)
Références
Neurology. 2017 Mar 21;88(12):1137-1143
pubmed: 28228570
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;87(8):851-8
pubmed: 26746183
Muscle Nerve. 1998 Dec;21(12):1775-8
pubmed: 9843082
J Neurol Sci. 1994 Apr;122(2):140-3
pubmed: 8021696
Kardiologiia. 2006;46(5):70
pubmed: 16858361
Front Neurosci. 2019 Dec 06;13:1310
pubmed: 31866818
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016 May;1862(5):1008-17
pubmed: 26689889
Biochemistry. 1991 Aug 13;30(32):8045-51
pubmed: 1868079
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jul;127(7):2684-91
pubmed: 27212114
FEBS Lett. 2006 May 29;580(13):2994-3005
pubmed: 16697371
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Jul;16(7):505-512
pubmed: 28522181
J Neurol Sci. 2015 Jul 15;354(1-2):70-4
pubmed: 25982504
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011 Mar 15;251(3):217-25
pubmed: 21237187
Eur J Neurol. 2010 Jan;17(1):84-9
pubmed: 19659753
Lancet Neurol. 2018 May;17(5):416-422
pubmed: 29525492
Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2010;11(1-2):140-7
pubmed: 19551535
Eur J Pharmacol. 1993 Sep 7;241(1):1-6
pubmed: 7901032
Neurology. 2015 Jun 2;84(22):2247-57
pubmed: 25934855
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2003 Sep;4(3):191-206
pubmed: 13129806
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;27(6):592-600
pubmed: 21780182
Eur J Pediatr. 1998 Apr;157 Suppl 2:S40-4
pubmed: 9587024
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;90(4):451-457
pubmed: 30636701
Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2010;11(1-2):178-80
pubmed: 19634063
Exp Neurol. 2010 Apr;222(2):191-203
pubmed: 20045411
Neuroreport. 2017 Jan 18;28(2):101-107
pubmed: 27922548
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Dec 21;7(12):e12046
pubmed: 30578206
Nature. 2019 Aug;572(7770):474-480
pubmed: 31330533
Neurology. 2008 Jan 15;70(3):222-5
pubmed: 18195267
J Am Chem Soc. 2009 Oct 28;131(42):15078-9
pubmed: 19799418
Nat Rev Neurol. 2011 Oct 11;7(11):639-49
pubmed: 21989247
Nat Rev Neurol. 2021 Feb;17(2):104-118
pubmed: 33340024
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015 Nov;86(11):1172-9
pubmed: 25935892
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;84(4):467-72
pubmed: 23117489
Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2009 Oct-Dec;10(5-6):310-23
pubmed: 19922118
Free Radic Biol Med. 2009 Jul 15;47(2):184-8
pubmed: 19409980
J Intern Med. 2021 Oct;290(4):758-788
pubmed: 34080741