Declining prevalence of current HCV infection and increased treatment uptake among people who inject drugs: The ETHOS Engage study.
Direct-acting antiviral era
Hepatitis C virus elimination
Hepatitis C virus infection
Hepatitis C virus treatment
People who inject drugs
Journal
The International journal on drug policy
ISSN: 1873-4758
Titre abrégé: Int J Drug Policy
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9014759
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
received:
02
11
2021
revised:
05
04
2022
accepted:
13
04
2022
pubmed:
10
5
2022
medline:
29
6
2022
entrez:
9
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Evaluating trends in HCV treatment and prevalence is crucial for monitoring elimination. We evaluated the change in current infection and treatment among people who inject drugs (PWID) between 2018-2019 and 2019-2021. ETHOS Engage is an observational cohort study of PWID attending drug treatment clinics and needle and syringe programs in Australia. Participant enrolment occurred over two periods, Wave 1 (May 2018-September 2019, 25 sites) and Wave 2 (November 2019-June 2021, 21 sites), with baseline questionnaire completion and point-of-care HCV RNA testing (Xpert® HCV Viral Load Fingerstick). Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with current HCV infection and historic HCV treatment. 2,395 individuals were enrolled across the two recruitment waves (66% male, median age 43, 72% current opioid agonist therapy, and 65% injecting in the previous month). HCV prevalence decreased from 24% to 17% between 2018-2019 and 2019-2021, respectively (p=0.003). HCV treatment increased from 66% to 74% between 2018-2019 and 2019-2021, respectively (p<0.001). After adjusting, there was a reduction in current HCV infection in 2019-2021 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50, 0.77) compared to 2018-2019. Other factors associated with current infection included homelessness (aOR, 1.70; 1.26, 2.30), incarceration (vs. never; historic: aOR 1.69; 95%CI 1.31, 2.19; recent: aOR 1.85; 95%CI, 1.35, 2.54), and recently injecting drugs (vs. >12 months ago; previous month <daily: aOR 2.03; 95%CI, 1.37, 3.02; ≥daily: aOR 2.90; 95%CI, 1.94, 4.32). The increase in HCV treatment and decrease in prevalence among PWID provides evidence of further progress towards HCV elimination; however, sub-populations may require additional support to enhance elimination. PWID are a priority population to facilitate HCV elimination and temporal data are crucial to understand trends in HCV infection and treatment in this group. Among a cohort of PWID recruited during two different waves and in an era of unrestricted DAA therapy, prevalence of HCV infection decreased and the proportion who had received HCV treatment increased. Sub-populations of PWID-including people who are homeless, people who have been incarcerated, people who frequently inject drugs, younger people, women, and people not engaged in OAT-may require additional support to enhance HCV elimination efforts.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Evaluating trends in HCV treatment and prevalence is crucial for monitoring elimination. We evaluated the change in current infection and treatment among people who inject drugs (PWID) between 2018-2019 and 2019-2021.
METHODS
ETHOS Engage is an observational cohort study of PWID attending drug treatment clinics and needle and syringe programs in Australia. Participant enrolment occurred over two periods, Wave 1 (May 2018-September 2019, 25 sites) and Wave 2 (November 2019-June 2021, 21 sites), with baseline questionnaire completion and point-of-care HCV RNA testing (Xpert® HCV Viral Load Fingerstick). Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with current HCV infection and historic HCV treatment.
RESULTS
2,395 individuals were enrolled across the two recruitment waves (66% male, median age 43, 72% current opioid agonist therapy, and 65% injecting in the previous month). HCV prevalence decreased from 24% to 17% between 2018-2019 and 2019-2021, respectively (p=0.003). HCV treatment increased from 66% to 74% between 2018-2019 and 2019-2021, respectively (p<0.001). After adjusting, there was a reduction in current HCV infection in 2019-2021 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50, 0.77) compared to 2018-2019. Other factors associated with current infection included homelessness (aOR, 1.70; 1.26, 2.30), incarceration (vs. never; historic: aOR 1.69; 95%CI 1.31, 2.19; recent: aOR 1.85; 95%CI, 1.35, 2.54), and recently injecting drugs (vs. >12 months ago; previous month <daily: aOR 2.03; 95%CI, 1.37, 3.02; ≥daily: aOR 2.90; 95%CI, 1.94, 4.32).
CONCLUSION
The increase in HCV treatment and decrease in prevalence among PWID provides evidence of further progress towards HCV elimination; however, sub-populations may require additional support to enhance elimination.
LAY SUMMARY
PWID are a priority population to facilitate HCV elimination and temporal data are crucial to understand trends in HCV infection and treatment in this group. Among a cohort of PWID recruited during two different waves and in an era of unrestricted DAA therapy, prevalence of HCV infection decreased and the proportion who had received HCV treatment increased. Sub-populations of PWID-including people who are homeless, people who have been incarcerated, people who frequently inject drugs, younger people, women, and people not engaged in OAT-may require additional support to enhance HCV elimination efforts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35533635
pii: S0955-3959(22)00125-6
doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103706
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antiviral Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103706Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declarations of Interest JG reports grants from Camurus, grants from Cepheid, grants from Hologic, grants from Indivior, grants from Merck, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Abbvie, grants and personal fees from Gilead Sciences, grants and personal fees from Merck, grants and personal fees from Cepheid, outside the submitted work. GD reports grants from Gilead, Abbvie, and Merck. LD has received investigator-initiated untied educational grants for studies of opioid medications in Australia from Indivior, Mundipharma and Seqirus. All remaining authors have no potential conflicts to declare.