Delirium Item Bank: Utilization to Evaluate and Create Delirium Instruments.
Delirium
Item bank
Item response theory
Measurement
Psychometrics
Journal
Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders
ISSN: 1421-9824
Titre abrégé: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9705200
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
12
10
2021
accepted:
07
02
2022
pubmed:
10
5
2022
medline:
7
6
2022
entrez:
9
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The large number of heterogeneous instruments in active use for identification of delirium prevents direct comparison of studies and the ability to combine results. In a recent systematic review we performed, we recommended four commonly used and well-validated instruments and subsequently harmonized them using advanced psychometric methods to develop an item bank, the Delirium Item Bank (DEL-IB). The goal of the present study was to find optimal cut-points on four existing instruments and to demonstrate use of the DEL-IB to create new instruments. We used a secondary analysis and simulation study based on data from three previous studies of hospitalized older adults (age 65+ years) in the USA, Ireland, and Belgium. The combined dataset included 600 participants, contributing 1,623 delirium assessments, and an overall incidence of delirium of about 22%. The measurements included the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition diagnostic criteria for delirium, Confusion Assessment Method (long form and short form), Delirium Observation Screening Scale, Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (total and severity scores), and Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS). We identified different cut-points for each existing instrument to optimize sensitivity or specificity, and compared instrument performance at each cut-point to the author-defined cut-point. For instance, the cut-point on the MDAS that maximizes both sensitivity and specificity was at a sum score of 6 yielding 89% sensitivity and 79% specificity. We then created four new example instruments (two short forms and two long forms) and evaluated their performance characteristics. In the first example short form instrument, the cut-point that maximizes sensitivity and specificity was at a sum score of 3 yielding 90% sensitivity, 81% specificity, 30% positive predictive value, and 99% negative predictive value. We used the DEL-IB to better understand the psychometric performance of widely used delirium identification instruments and scorings, and also demonstrated its use to create new instruments. Ultimately, we hope that the DEL-IB might be used to create optimized delirium identification instruments and to spur the development of a unified approach to identify delirium.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35533663
pii: 000522522
doi: 10.1159/000522522
pmc: PMC9518700
mid: NIHMS1837672
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
110-119Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG044518
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R36 AG070184
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R24 AG054259
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P01 AG031720
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM107000
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R33 AG071744
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Références
Ann Intern Med. 1990 Dec 15;113(12):941-8
pubmed: 2240918
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;22(12):1513-21
pubmed: 24745562
JAMA. 2010 Jul 28;304(4):443-51
pubmed: 20664045
Palliat Med. 2014 Jan;28(1):79-86
pubmed: 23744840
Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):419-30
pubmed: 18435502
JAMA. 2017 Sep 26;318(12):1161-1174
pubmed: 28973626
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;30(3):284-294
pubmed: 34417086
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 Jun;27(6):883-9
pubmed: 25601222
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2020;49(1):77-90
pubmed: 32554974
J Gerontol Nurs. 2018 Dec 1;44(12):35-43
pubmed: 30484846
Gerontology. 2019;65(1):20-29
pubmed: 30032141
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001 Spring;13(2):229-42
pubmed: 11449030
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997 Mar;13(3):128-37
pubmed: 9114631
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Feb;69(2):547-555
pubmed: 33135780
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 12;377(15):1456-1466
pubmed: 29020579
N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 4;340(9):669-76
pubmed: 10053175
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2003 Fall;17(3):207-24
pubmed: 14655974
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Oct;52(10):1744-9
pubmed: 15450055
Malays J Med Sci. 2000 Jan;7(1):10-5
pubmed: 22844209
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2003 Spring;17(1):31-50
pubmed: 12751884
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S3-S11
pubmed: 17443116
J Math Psychol. 2017 Dec;81:80-97
pubmed: 29200501
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Oct;92(10 Suppl):S20-7
pubmed: 21958919