Comparison of disk diffusion, MIC test strip and broth microdilution methods for cefiderocol susceptibility testing on carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales.
Carbapenemase
Gram negatives
KPC
NDM
OXA-48
Susceptibility testing
VIM
Journal
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
ISSN: 1469-0691
Titre abrégé: Clin Microbiol Infect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9516420
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
09
12
2021
revised:
07
04
2022
accepted:
16
04
2022
pubmed:
10
5
2022
medline:
27
7
2022
entrez:
9
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cefiderocol is a catechol-substituted cephalosporin dedicated to the treatment of infections caused by multidrug resistant gram-negative rods. Cefiderocol susceptibility testing might be complex. We compared cefiderocol susceptibility testing methods on a relevant collection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. CE-IVD (European CE marking required for all in vitro diagnostic (IVD)) broth microdilution (BMD) plate (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) using regular Mueller-Hinton broth, MIC test strip (Liofilchem, Teramo, Italy), and disk diffusion (Liofilchem) were compared to a frozen BMD plate prepared with iron depleted Mueller-Hinton broth. First, a collection of 100 entirely sequenced carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales was used to compare these methods. Then, a prospective comparison of disk diffusion and CE-IVD BMD was performed on 827 consecutive carbapenem non-susceptible Enterobacterales including 634 carbapenemase-producers. Compared to reference method, CE-IVD BMD plate gave 95.0% (95% CI, 88.8-97.9) categorisation agreement (CA), 2.8% (95% CI, 0.4-14.2) very major errors (VME), and 1.6% (95% CI, 0.3-8.7) major errors (ME) with high reproducibility. MIC strip gave only 63% (95% CI, 53.2-71.8) of CA and 94.9% (95% CI, 83.1-98.6) of VME due to critical underestimation of the MICs. Disk diffusion gave 77% (95% CI, 67.9-84.2) CA with additional 8% of the isolates within the area of technical uncertainty of 18-22 mm. Prospectively, disk diffusion gave 81.7% (95% CI, 79.0-84.2) CA, 23.3% (95% CI, 15.1-34.2%)VME, and 4.9% (95% CI, 3.6-6.7) ME. Additionally, 21.3% (95% CI, 18.6-24.2) of CRE were within the area of technical uncertainty. Commercial CE-IVD BMD (ThermoFisher) is accurate for cefiderocol MIC determination in difficult-to-treat Enterobacterales whereas MIC test strip (Liofilchem), that was formulated for Pseudomonas aeruginosa only, should be avoided. Disk diffusion might be useful for screening, but many of these CRE have to be re-tested using BMD to assess definitive categorization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35533970
pii: S1198-743X(22)00221-X
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.04.013
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Carbapenems
0
Cephalosporins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1156.e1-1156.e5Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.