Benefit-cost analysis of electronic claims processing under Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme.
health economics
health policy
quality in health care
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 05 2022
09 05 2022
Historique:
entrez:
9
5
2022
pubmed:
10
5
2022
medline:
12
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit-cost of E-claims. A benefit-cost analysis was used to evaluate the efficiency of E-claims from the perspective of the providers and the purchaser. A benefit-cost analysis approach was taken for this economic evaluation. Furthermore, we estimated the incremental benefit-cost ratio (IBCR) of the intervention under assessment. Purchasers and healthcare providers of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) of Ghana were the study population. The analysis was stratified according to providers and purchaser. Cost incurred in processing claims electronically and manually were estimated by assessing the resource use and their corresponding costs. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the robustness of the results to variations in discount rate and proportions of claims processed under E-claims compared with paper claims. The combined sample of providers and purchaser made incremental gains from processing claims electronically. The IBCR was -19.75, 25.56 and 5.10 for all (sample) providers, purchaser and both providers and purchaser, respectively. When projected for the 330 facilities submitting claims to the NHIS claims processing centre (CPC) as at December 2014, the IBCR were -35.20, 25.56 and 90.06 for all providers, purchaser and both providers and purchaser. The results were sensitive to the discount rate used and proportions of E-claims compared with paper claims. Electronic processing of claims is more efficient compared with manual processing, hence provide an economic case for scaling it up to cover many more healthcare facilities and NHIS CPCs in the Ghana.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35534071
pii: bmjopen-2021-054757
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054757
pmc: PMC9086605
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e054757Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: JN received consultancy fees to undertake the study. ATS and WH are both employees of the funder.
Références
Ghana Med J. 2012 Dec;46(4):189-99
pubmed: 23661837
PLoS Med. 2009 Jan 6;6(1):e1000007
pubmed: 19127975
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):921-928
pubmed: 27987641
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 26;14(8):e0221195
pubmed: 31449530
Health Policy Plan. 2014 May;29(3):271-9
pubmed: 23543198
Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50
pubmed: 23538175
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):e0165151
pubmed: 27832082
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2009 Aug 28;9:20
pubmed: 19715583
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Aug 05;12:35
pubmed: 25096303
Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Nov;86(11):871-6
pubmed: 19030693
JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316(10):1093-103
pubmed: 27623463
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 6;17(1):115
pubmed: 28166773
Ghana Med J. 2012 Dec;46(4):200-10
pubmed: 23661838
Health Policy Plan. 2008 Mar;23(2):150-60
pubmed: 18245803