Key questions: research priorities for student mental health.
Student mental health
prevention
priority setting
qualitative research
Journal
BJPsych open
ISSN: 2056-4724
Titre abrégé: BJPsych Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101667931
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 May 2022
10 May 2022
Historique:
entrez:
10
5
2022
pubmed:
11
5
2022
medline:
11
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The high prevalence of mental distress among university students is gaining academic, policy and public attention. As the volume of research into student mental health increases, it is important to involve students to ensure that the evidence produced can translate into meaningful improvements. For the first time, we consult UK students about their research priorities on student mental health. This priority setting exercise involved current UK university students who were asked to submit three research questions relating to student mental health. Responses were aggregated into themes through content analysis and considered in the context of existing research. Students were involved throughout the project, including inception, design, recruitment, analysis and dissemination. UK university students (N = 385) submitted 991 questions, categorised into seven themes: epidemiology, causes and risk factors, academic factors and work-life balance, sense of belonging, intervention and services, mental health literacy and consequences. Across themes, respondents highlighted the importance of understanding the experience of minority groups. Students are interested in understanding the causes and consequences of poor mental health at university, across academic and social domains. They would like to improve staff and students' knowledge about mental health, and have access to evidence-based support. Future research should take a broad lens to evaluate interventions; considering how services are designed and delivered, and investigating institutional and behavioural barriers to accessibility, including how this varies across different groups within the student population.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The high prevalence of mental distress among university students is gaining academic, policy and public attention. As the volume of research into student mental health increases, it is important to involve students to ensure that the evidence produced can translate into meaningful improvements.
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
For the first time, we consult UK students about their research priorities on student mental health.
METHOD
METHODS
This priority setting exercise involved current UK university students who were asked to submit three research questions relating to student mental health. Responses were aggregated into themes through content analysis and considered in the context of existing research. Students were involved throughout the project, including inception, design, recruitment, analysis and dissemination.
RESULTS
RESULTS
UK university students (N = 385) submitted 991 questions, categorised into seven themes: epidemiology, causes and risk factors, academic factors and work-life balance, sense of belonging, intervention and services, mental health literacy and consequences. Across themes, respondents highlighted the importance of understanding the experience of minority groups.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Students are interested in understanding the causes and consequences of poor mental health at university, across academic and social domains. They would like to improve staff and students' knowledge about mental health, and have access to evidence-based support. Future research should take a broad lens to evaluate interventions; considering how services are designed and delivered, and investigating institutional and behavioural barriers to accessibility, including how this varies across different groups within the student population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35535504
doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.61
pii: S2056472422000618
pmc: PMC9169497
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e90Subventions
Organisme : Economic and Social Research Council
Références
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):156-65
pubmed: 24411644
J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Oct;127(7):623-638
pubmed: 30211576
Med Educ. 2009 Mar;43(3):274-82
pubmed: 19250355
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 May;56(5):879-882
pubmed: 33590312
Br J Psychol. 2004 Nov;95(Pt 4):509-21
pubmed: 15527535
Health Care Women Int. 1992 Jul-Sep;13(3):313-21
pubmed: 1399871
Behav Sleep Med. 2020 May-Jun;18(3):309-320
pubmed: 30821507
Med J Aust. 1997 Feb 17;166(4):182-6
pubmed: 9066546
Psychol Sci. 2019 May;30(5):765-775
pubmed: 30955415
Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12
pubmed: 14769454
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 23;21(1):573
pubmed: 33757482
Am Psychol. 2012 Apr;67(3):231-43
pubmed: 22040221
Int J Public Health. 2016 Sep;61(7):797-807
pubmed: 27364779
J Ment Health. 2018 Jun;27(3):240-246
pubmed: 29451411
J Ment Health. 2018 Jun;27(3):230-239
pubmed: 29436883
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 09;11:1226
pubmed: 32581976
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Jan;201(1):60-7
pubmed: 23274298
Stress Health. 2018 Feb;34(1):36-45
pubmed: 28509376
J Ment Health. 2021 May 19;:1-8
pubmed: 34008464
Ann Behav Med. 2010 Oct;40(2):218-27
pubmed: 20652462
Acad Med. 2014 Apr;89(4):573-7
pubmed: 24556765
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 28;12(6):e0178142
pubmed: 28658300
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Jul;75(7):1539-1548
pubmed: 30835889