Simulated Leaching of Foliar Applied Copper Bactericides on the Soil Microbiome Utilizing Various Beta Diversity Resemblance Measurements.
bacteria
diversity measurements
high-throughput sequencing analysis
nanomaterials
soil microbiology
Journal
Microbiology spectrum
ISSN: 2165-0497
Titre abrégé: Microbiol Spectr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101634614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 06 2022
29 06 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
11
5
2022
medline:
2
7
2022
entrez:
10
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Copper bactericides are routinely used to control Xanthomonas perforans (XP), causal agent of bacterial spot of tomato. Given the widespread tolerance to copper in XP strains in FL, USA, nanotechnology-based elemental composites have gained interest for their potential applications in agriculture in part due to their enhanced antimicrobial properties and toxicity to copper-tolerant strains. However, little is known about the potential impact of conventional copper bactericides as well as nano-based elemental composites on soil microbial communities, as determined by high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rDNA. We compared the effects of 2 and 200 μg/mL of core-shell (CS), a metallic copper composite, and a conventional copper bactericide + mancozeb (Cu+Man) on the soil microbiome. These treatments were compared to three controls, the microbial profile of the soil prior to application of copper products, a water application, and spiking the soil with a soilborne phytobacterium, Ralstonia solanacearum (RS). The RS treatment was included to determine if downstream analysis could detect the artificial inoculation. Utilizing multiple β diversity measurements, each emphasizing various tenets of ecology, provided a greater perspective of the effects the treatments had on the microbiome. Analysis of HTS data revealed that the two treatments containing field applied rates of metallic copper, CS 200 and Cu+Man, had the largest impact on the soil microbiome at seven-days posttreatment compared to water. However, we simulated field applied rates of CS 200 entering the soil by treating soil with CS 2 and determined this concentration had a negligible effect on the soil microbiome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35536029
doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01481-21
pmc: PMC9241806
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Soil
0
Water
059QF0KO0R
Copper
789U1901C5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0148121Références
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Sep;79(17):5112-20
pubmed: 23793624
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Jun;77(12):4089-96
pubmed: 21515725
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2011;213:1-26
pubmed: 21541846
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Aug;67(8):3557-63
pubmed: 11472932
Front Microbiol. 2019 Aug 23;10:1944
pubmed: 31507559
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6
pubmed: 23193283
Nat Methods. 2010 Oct;7(10):813-9
pubmed: 20818378
ACS Nano. 2011 Sep 27;5(9):7214-25
pubmed: 21812479
Phytopathology. 2012 Oct;102(10):924-36
pubmed: 22957819
Curr Med Chem. 2005;12(18):2163-75
pubmed: 16101497
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):20124
pubmed: 31882706
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Dec;71(12):8228-35
pubmed: 16332807
Phytopathology. 2018 Feb;108(2):196-205
pubmed: 28990482
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Nov 4;48(21):12561-8
pubmed: 25295836
Environ Pollut. 2009 May;157(5):1619-25
pubmed: 19185963
Plant Dis. 2016 Jul;100(7):1460-1465
pubmed: 30686188
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200
pubmed: 21700674
Ecol Lett. 2016 Aug;19(8):937-47
pubmed: 27335203
Nature. 2014 Jan 23;505(7484):543-5
pubmed: 24402225
Nanotechnology. 2005 Oct;16(10):2346-53
pubmed: 20818017
Oecologia. 2001 Oct;129(2):271-280
pubmed: 28547606
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;75(23):7537-41
pubmed: 19801464
Front Microbiol. 2019 Apr 05;10:648
pubmed: 31024471
Phytopathology. 2019 Jan;109(1):52-62
pubmed: 30070617
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Aug 07;7:371
pubmed: 16893466
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7
pubmed: 17586664
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Dec 19;66(50):13056-13064
pubmed: 30511854
J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2005 Feb;5(2):244-9
pubmed: 15853142
Ecol Lett. 2011 Jan;14(1):19-28
pubmed: 21070562
J Phys Chem B. 2006 Aug 24;110(33):16248-53
pubmed: 16913750
Phytopathology. 2013 Mar;103(3):228-36
pubmed: 23190116
J Agric Food Chem. 2014 Jul 2;62(26):6043-52
pubmed: 24911959
J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2012 Aug;8(4):558-66
pubmed: 22852465